oh christ.Varegg wrote:
I don't believe Dilbert have ever stated that he thinks the US is all evil so who is ignoring or making up facts?lowing wrote:
Yes he does, but in order to justify your attitude that the US is all evil, you must ignore certain facts.CC-Marley wrote:
You don't see an AK and a RPG?
yeah okVaregg wrote:
I don't believe Dilbert have ever stated that he thinks the US is all evil so who is ignoring or making up facts?lowing wrote:
Yes he does, but in order to justify your attitude that the US is all evil, you must ignore certain facts.CC-Marley wrote:
You don't see an AK and a RPG?
Even though some of us are sceptical about alot when it comes to US policy and politics doesn't mean we hate the US and/or its citizens ...
you say this, and yet refuse to acknowledge the armed insurgents that they were firing upon. You only choose to focus on the journalists, who were among the insurgents who got killed. You refuse to accept that these soldiers did not fire recklessly, they described the situation and got permission to fire.
You also are not even questioning why these journalists were fraternizing with the enemy, you only want to focus on the journalists but not to the point of questioning the roll they played in their own deaths.
yer right, got no idea how I could assume such things about a member of this forum.
Last edited by lowing (2010-04-07 04:53:55)
no kidding. dont piss on my leg and tell me its raining.
The guy is blatantly ignoring the fact there were weapons and it made them a target. So he's whining about how the civilians are innocent victims who were murdered by the Americans.Varegg wrote:
I don't believe Dilbert have ever stated that he thinks the US is all evil so who is ignoring or making up facts?lowing wrote:
Yes he does, but in order to justify your attitude that the US is all evil, you must ignore certain facts.CC-Marley wrote:
You don't see an AK and a RPG?
Even though some of us are sceptical about alot when it comes to US policy and politics doesn't mean we hate the US and/or its citizens ...
Thread closed.
Seriously why is anybody still talking about this?
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Could anyone see grenades or machine guns in the video?
you mean other than the RPG's no sure couldn'tAussieReaper wrote:
Could anyone see grenades or machine guns in the video?
great...here comes another one.
The report released by the Pentagon mentions machine guns and grenades found near the bodies of those killed. I can see how you'd mistake the camera for an RPG. But I don't see any other weapons. Or AK's.
The best thing the military can do at this point is release everything and be transparent. Remove the doubt most people have about the incident.
As DB says, wikileaks is biased, I also think the report is biased. We need more evidence, either way.
The second choppers footage would be ideal, for example.
The best thing the military can do at this point is release everything and be transparent. Remove the doubt most people have about the incident.
As DB says, wikileaks is biased, I also think the report is biased. We need more evidence, either way.
The second choppers footage would be ideal, for example.
Last edited by AussieReaper (2010-04-07 04:39:18)
from 2007? good luck. tell us who killed kennedy also.
Aussie, there was a guy carrying an RPG CLEARLY in that video. Might wanna look again.AussieReaper wrote:
The report released by the Pentagon mentions machine guns and grenades found near the bodies of those killed. I can see how you'd mistake the camera for an RPG. But I don't see any other weapons. Or AK's.
The best thing the military can do at this point is release everything and be transparent. Remove the doubt most people have about the incident.
As DB says, wikileaks is biased, I also think the report is biased. We need more evidence, either way.
The second choppers footage would be ideal, for example.
The CIA did. GWB was the triggerman!11 Bravo wrote:
from 2007? good luck. tell us who killed kennedy also.
Last edited by Flecco (2010-04-07 04:44:02)
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
There is clearly in plain sight, an AK and a RPG.AussieReaper wrote:
The report released by the Pentagon mentions machine guns and grenades found near the bodies of those killed. I can see how you'd mistake the camera for an RPG. But I don't see any other weapons. Or AK's.
The best thing the military can do at this point is release everything and be transparent. Remove the doubt most people have about the incident.
As DB says, wikileaks is biased, I also think the report is biased. We need more evidence, either way.
The second choppers footage would be ideal, for example.
What is funny is, even after he watches it and sees the weapons, his opinion will not change.Vilham wrote:
There is clearly in plain sight, an AK and a RPG.AussieReaper wrote:
The report released by the Pentagon mentions machine guns and grenades found near the bodies of those killed. I can see how you'd mistake the camera for an RPG. But I don't see any other weapons. Or AK's.
The best thing the military can do at this point is release everything and be transparent. Remove the doubt most people have about the incident.
As DB says, wikileaks is biased, I also think the report is biased. We need more evidence, either way.
The second choppers footage would be ideal, for example.
Kerry posted the gif a few pages back. Go have a look.
Was that targeted at Dilbert or me lowing? ... if at me I suggest you reread my posts in this particular thread ...lowing wrote:
yeah okVaregg wrote:
I don't believe Dilbert have ever stated that he thinks the US is all evil so who is ignoring or making up facts?lowing wrote:
Yes he does, but in order to justify your attitude that the US is all evil, you must ignore certain facts.
Even though some of us are sceptical about alot when it comes to US policy and politics doesn't mean we hate the US and/or its citizens ...
you say this, and yet refuse to acknowledge the armed insurgents that they were firing upon. You only choose to focus on the journalists, who were among the insurgents who got killed. You refuse to accept that these soldiers did not fire recklessly, they described the situation and got permission to fire.
You also are not even questioning why these journalists were fraternizing with the enemy, you only want to focus on the journalists but not to the point of questioning the roll they played in their own deaths.
yer right, got no idea how I could assume such things about a member of this forum.
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
oh christ what exactly?11 Bravo wrote:
oh christ.Varegg wrote:
I don't believe Dilbert have ever stated that he thinks the US is all evil so who is ignoring or making up facts?lowing wrote:
Yes he does, but in order to justify your attitude that the US is all evil, you must ignore certain facts.
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
targeted to the general public of this thread. most recently Aussie and Dilbert. I question your defense of such posts and such posters in this thread. By doing so, I assume you agree with them, and the only way that can happen is by ignoring everything in the video and the article KM posted.Varegg wrote:
Was that targeted at Dilbert or me lowing? ... if at me I suggest you reread my posts in this particular thread ...lowing wrote:
yeah okVaregg wrote:
I don't believe Dilbert have ever stated that he thinks the US is all evil so who is ignoring or making up facts?
Even though some of us are sceptical about alot when it comes to US policy and politics doesn't mean we hate the US and/or its citizens ...
you say this, and yet refuse to acknowledge the armed insurgents that they were firing upon. You only choose to focus on the journalists, who were among the insurgents who got killed. You refuse to accept that these soldiers did not fire recklessly, they described the situation and got permission to fire.
You also are not even questioning why these journalists were fraternizing with the enemy, you only want to focus on the journalists but not to the point of questioning the roll they played in their own deaths.
yer right, got no idea how I could assume such things about a member of this forum.
I didn't defend his view at all ... I questioned your statement about Dilbert thinking the US is all evil ... if by that you asume I share his view your capability of reasonable thinking is gravely malfunctional ...lowing wrote:
targeted to the general public of this thread. most recently Aussie and Dilbert. I question your defense of such posts and such posters in this thread. By doing so, I assume you agree with them, and the only way that can happen is by ignoring everything in the video and the article KM posted.Varegg wrote:
Was that targeted at Dilbert or me lowing? ... if at me I suggest you reread my posts in this particular thread ...lowing wrote:
yeah ok
you say this, and yet refuse to acknowledge the armed insurgents that they were firing upon. You only choose to focus on the journalists, who were among the insurgents who got killed. You refuse to accept that these soldiers did not fire recklessly, they described the situation and got permission to fire.
You also are not even questioning why these journalists were fraternizing with the enemy, you only want to focus on the journalists but not to the point of questioning the roll they played in their own deaths.
yer right, got no idea how I could assume such things about a member of this forum.
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
No you admit you are "sceptical of US policy and politics" even in the instances where it has been proven wrong. ( this OP). So forgive me if I question the motives of the forum members posting here. It isn't like there isn't a pattern.Varegg wrote:
I didn't defend his view at all ... I questioned your statement about Dilbert thinking the US is all evil ... if by that you asume I share his view your capability of reasonable thinking is gravely malfunctional ...lowing wrote:
targeted to the general public of this thread. most recently Aussie and Dilbert. I question your defense of such posts and such posters in this thread. By doing so, I assume you agree with them, and the only way that can happen is by ignoring everything in the video and the article KM posted.Varegg wrote:
Was that targeted at Dilbert or me lowing? ... if at me I suggest you reread my posts in this particular thread ...
Last edited by lowing (2010-04-07 05:30:19)
and this mr egg is the answer to my oh christ commentlowing wrote:
It isn't like there isn't a pattern.
what has been proven wrong? the policies?lowing wrote:
No you admit you are sceptical of us "policy and politics" even in the instances where it has been proven wrong. ( this OP).
I was speaking in general terms and not about the OP in particular hence why I wrote it like that ... but yes you are correct that there is a pattern of sceptisism when it comes to many non US members of this site on average but that doesn't mean all us sceptics agree on everything ... that is clearly a wrong asumption on your account lowing ...lowing wrote:
No you admit you are sceptical of us "policy and politics" even in the instances where it has been proven wrong. ( this OP). So forgive me if I question the motives of the forum members posting here. It isn't like there isn't a pattern.Varegg wrote:
I didn't defend his view at all ... I questioned your statement about Dilbert thinking the US is all evil ... if by that you asume I share his view your capability of reasonable thinking is gravely malfunctional ...lowing wrote:
targeted to the general public of this thread. most recently Aussie and Dilbert. I question your defense of such posts and such posters in this thread. By doing so, I assume you agree with them, and the only way that can happen is by ignoring everything in the video and the article KM posted.
And remember this lowing ... one can be sceptical about something that is proven true ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
the pilots adhering to the ROE's in the example of the OP. Against assertions by you and your ilk of simply gun running over innocent civilians.ruisleipa wrote:
what has been proven wrong? the policies?lowing wrote:
No you admit you are sceptical of us "policy and politics" even in the instances where it has been proven wrong. ( this OP).
Please elaborate because I still have difficulties understanding your motive writing just that ... "oh christ there is a pattern" isn't exactly explaining anything is there?11 Bravo wrote:
and this mr egg is the answer to my oh christ commentlowing wrote:
It isn't like there isn't a pattern.
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
if you dont see the pattern of certain members by now in relation to their posts regarding ANYTHING about the US, then well I dont know what to tell you.