BF2S Forums Seven arrested in FBI raids linked to Christian militia group

lowing wrote:

This quote is a famous cherry pick of those trying to dispel Jesus as anything except "righteous". In context, what he was saying was, in following him, and abandoning the traditions of the family, strife would be result within that family. He has not advocated  the destruction of family.


As far as Muhammad there is no interpretation as to what he did in action and what he taught. He WAS a murderer and there is no denying it. He advocated killing to further the cause of Islam.

That's your interpretation. I just read the whole shebang. You can draw many many interpretations. Interpretation. Thank you. His view from what I gather is that unrepentent sinners should be burned in the fires of hell. Not exactly lovey dovey shit. I love these old books - anyone can cherry pick anything.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2010-03-31 16:08:40)

eleven bravo wrote:

now that we've established lowing's knowledge of biblical text we could also further establish the fact that lowing's prior signature was calling for the death of the President of the US

lowing forgot the context I think (or never had a fucking clue about the context in the first place, probably google searched a odd bible quote justification site). Not joking here but the previous two lines, that I have here in front of me on my lap are:

"Do not suppose that I come to bring peace, but a sword."

I suppose that's a 'sword of love'?

In honesty, the context I read it in having been raised as a Christian and taught along certain lines, would be that JC wasn't interested in making the world perfect and serenely harmonious, just bringing as many people over into his army of the righteous so that upon the 'day of judgement' he would have saved as many as possible from the 'wrath of God'. But of course, that's just my interpretation.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2010-03-31 16:16:41)

CameronPoe wrote:

"Do not suppose that I come to bring peace, but a sword."

But I liked Call of Juarez too!

CameronPoe wrote:

Morpheus wrote:

also, can someone explain to me the difference between muslim and islam?

One's a human the other is a religion.

right, but I mean, isn't a muslim a follower of islam? Because it seemed to me that a certain user with a slightly-off sense of context made them into two entirely unrelated things...

Morpheus wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Morpheus wrote:

also, can someone explain to me the difference between muslim and islam?

One's a human the other is a religion.

right, but I mean, isn't a muslim a follower of islam? Because it seemed to me that a certain user with a slightly-off sense of context made them into two entirely unrelated things...

Yup a "certain user" has. a Musli is an individual, judged individually. I do not care what anyone calls themselves, they are judged by their actions.

I am right here, you are allowed to address me by the way.

CameronPoe wrote:

eleven bravo wrote:

now that we've established lowing's knowledge of biblical text we could also further establish the fact that lowing's prior signature was calling for the death of the President of the US

lowing forgot the context I think (or never had a fucking clue about the context in the first place, probably google searched a odd bible quote justification site). Not joking here but the previous two lines, that I have here in front of me on my lap are:

"Do not suppose that I come to bring peace, but a sword."

I suppose that's a 'sword of love'?

In honesty, the context I read it in having been raised as a Christian and taught along certain lines, would be that JC wasn't interested in making the world perfect and serenely harmonious, just bringing as many people over into his army of the righteous so that upon the 'day of judgement' he would have saved as many as possible from the 'wrath of God'. But of course, that's just my interpretation.

and yet Jesus never carried a sword, or killed anyone. hmmmmmmm so much for literal "interpretations"

lowing if one of your children decided to marry a black person would you have a problem with that?

lowing wrote:

eleven bravo wrote:

lowing if one of your children decided to marry a black person would you have a problem with that?

Absolutely not.

I love my children. If my boys came home and told me they were gay. It would not matter to me. I would never turn my back on my sons unless they did something maliciously and on purpose to harm another person.

I raise my sons to respect and to accept responsibility for their actions. I will hold them to it as I do everyone else.

How about gay AND marrying a black guy?

Michigan lol.

Morpheus wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Michigan lol.

eh?

Much of Michigan sucks.

Cybargs wrote:

Morpheus wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Michigan lol.

eh?

Much of Michigan sucks.

I don't get this - are you from the U.S.?

lowing wrote:

jsnipy wrote:

lowing wrote:

Absolutely not.

I love my children. If my boys came home and told me they were gay. It would not matter to me. I would never turn my back on my sons unless they did something maliciously and on purpose to harm another person.

I raise my sons to respect and to accept responsibility for their actions. I will hold them to it as I do everyone else.

How about gay AND marrying a black guy?

White, black or purple, I will question my sons judgement on appearance, attitude, and actions. If he brought home a sagger ( white or black) or some body pierced pin head (white or black) then I would have a problem. Never because of race.

how about gay, black AND muslim

13/f/taiwan wrote:

Religion of Peace

thats just one portion plus u know Christianity is subdivided just like any other religion and there are good and bad people in every religion and to speculate that everyone is like that its just stupid...