presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6237|Places 'n such

Kmar wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

Feynman>anyone I can think of. Including Sagan.
No not really. Sagan did much more to bring Science to the masses. Books, movies, the most watched Science series of all time. The cosmos was about much more than one area of Science (astronomy). It went over the entire history of Science.
Suppose I'm a bit biased, Feynman has to be one of my favourite figures ever. Plus the lectures on physics saved me with thermodynamics.
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6951|Canberra, AUS
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14680570

Looks increasingly like supersymmetry and its derivatives are on shaky ground. Interesting times ahead as the most elegant theories go out the window... Occam's razor looking a little blunt at the moment.

Last edited by Spark (2011-08-27 07:06:16)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6951|Canberra, AUS
interesting to say the least

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-31/m … er/2862632

Ecstasy could be modified to treat leukaemia, lymphoma and myeloma, according to chemists at the University of Western Australia.

Associate Professor Matthew Piggott and his team have published papers showing compounds similar to the drug MDMA - also known as ecstasy - have been shown to kill cell lines derived from blood cancers.

The team has previously modified MDMA to try and find a treatment for Parkinson's disease.

But Professor Piggott stresses the drug as it exists now should be avoided as a cure for anything, as the dose required to have an effect is itself deadly.

"To be honest, if we could use ecstasy to treat cancer, I think we should do it. The side-effects of MDMA are minimal compared to curing someone of cancer," he said.

"But I reiterate that MDMA cannot cure someone of cancer."

Professor Piggott says his team has made a number of key modifications to ecstasy as a precursor to developing a treatment.

For a start, its psychoactivity has been removed, while its potency against cancer cells has been boosted 100-fold.

"For a cancer treatment, I guess if there are some psychoactive effects, I mean, if it cures you, who cares?" he said.

"But for other types of treatments like Parkinson's disease people don't want to be high all the time."

He says while his compounds look like ecstasy, they are structurally different.

"It's kind of like buying a Corolla from a car sales yard, and then you start modifying it, you put on a spoiler and you put on some mag wheels and you change the engine," he said.

"You've got something different from what you start off with."

But Professor Piggott says though his trials have been promising, it would be a long time before modified ecstasy is a treatment option.

"Before you even look at human trials, it would be at least five years, maybe five to 10," he said.

The research from the University of Western Australia, in collaboration with the University of Birmingham, was published in the journals Investigational New Drugs and MedChemComm.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6992

Spark wrote:

interesting to say the least

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-31/m … er/2862632

Ecstasy could be modified to treat leukaemia, lymphoma and myeloma, according to chemists at the University of Western Australia.

Associate Professor Matthew Piggott and his team have published papers showing compounds similar to the drug MDMA - also known as ecstasy - have been shown to kill cell lines derived from blood cancers.

The team has previously modified MDMA to try and find a treatment for Parkinson's disease.

But Professor Piggott stresses the drug as it exists now should be avoided as a cure for anything, as the dose required to have an effect is itself deadly.

"To be honest, if we could use ecstasy to treat cancer, I think we should do it. The side-effects of MDMA are minimal compared to curing someone of cancer," he said.

"But I reiterate that MDMA cannot cure someone of cancer."

Professor Piggott says his team has made a number of key modifications to ecstasy as a precursor to developing a treatment.

For a start, its psychoactivity has been removed, while its potency against cancer cells has been boosted 100-fold.

"For a cancer treatment, I guess if there are some psychoactive effects, I mean, if it cures you, who cares?" he said.

"But for other types of treatments like Parkinson's disease people don't want to be high all the time."

He says while his compounds look like ecstasy, they are structurally different.

"It's kind of like buying a Corolla from a car sales yard, and then you start modifying it, you put on a spoiler and you put on some mag wheels and you change the engine," he said.

"You've got something different from what you start off with."

But Professor Piggott says though his trials have been promising, it would be a long time before modified ecstasy is a treatment option.

"Before you even look at human trials, it would be at least five years, maybe five to 10," he said.

The research from the University of Western Australia, in collaboration with the University of Birmingham, was published in the journals Investigational New Drugs and MedChemComm.
I thought ze germans figured that out?
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6877|132 and Bush

NASA: Space station may need to be evacuated by late November if Russian rockets remain grounded http://wapo.st/nhQz1j

.and here we go.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7051|Moscow, Russia
what, you'd rather have more people toasted alive in another challenger or columbia?
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6877|132 and Bush

Shahter wrote:

what, you'd rather have more people toasted alive in another challenger or columbia?
Yes. I absolutely would. Actually no. I'd prefer something like te Soyuz 11, or maybe even Soyuz 1. Those analogies would be much more appropriate.

Wtf are u on about?
I'm just saying there's only one real method now and it sucks.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7051|Moscow, Russia

Kmar wrote:

Shahter wrote:

what, you'd rather have more people toasted alive in another challenger or columbia?
Yes. I absolutely would. Actually no. I'd prefer something like te Soyuz 11, or maybe even Soyuz 1. Those analogies would be much more appropriate.
you wish.

Wtf are u on about?
I'm just saying there's only one real method now and it sucks.
yes, it does. you know, maybe you should spend less on bombing poor bastards on the other side of the globe and more on developing something as reliable as soyuz for yourself.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6992
mega derail? how does a space station issue go on about how america is evil.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7051|Moscow, Russia

Cybargs wrote:

mega derail? how does a space station issue go on about how america is evil.
find the word "evil" in my post above then we'll talk.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6877|132 and Bush

Shahter wrote:

Kmar wrote:

Shahter wrote:

what, you'd rather have more people toasted alive in another challenger or columbia?
Yes. I absolutely would. Actually no. I'd prefer something like te Soyuz 11, or maybe even Soyuz 1. Those analogies would be much more appropriate.
you wish.
Sarcasm.. derp

Shahter wrote:

Wtf are u on about?
I'm just saying there's only one real method now and it sucks.
yes, it does. you know, maybe you should spend less on bombing poor bastards on the other side of the globe and more on developing something as reliable as soyuz for yourself.
Reliable?  you mean like the Buran? Please. The shuttle program alone has produced more manned spaceflights then the entire history of Soviet/Russian space exploration.

Maybe you should change the record, or stick to the subject? We are working on a new heavy launch system as a matter of fact.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6992

Shahter wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

mega derail? how does a space station issue go on about how america is evil.
find the word "evil" in my post above then we'll talk.
how about how glorious mother russia is and how terrible the west is.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7051|Moscow, Russia

Kmar wrote:

Maybe you should change the record, or stick to the subject? We are working on a new heavy launch system as a matter of fact.
maybe you should have closed your glorious shuttle program after you developed that new system? you know, maybe even divert some resources spent on that madness you have going in middle east towards keeping an actual worthwhile program going until you had something to switch to, huh? now you are stuck with "evil ruskies" and you've nobody but yourself to blame.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7051|Moscow, Russia

Cybargs wrote:

Shahter wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

mega derail? how does a space station issue go on about how america is evil.
find the word "evil" in my post above then we'll talk.
how about how glorious mother russia is and how terrible the west is.
why would i discuss something like that with you, kiddo? you don't know shit about any of that.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6877|132 and Bush

Shahter wrote:

Kmar wrote:

Maybe you should change the record, or stick to the subject? We are working on a new heavy launch system as a matter of fact.
maybe you should have closed your glorious shuttle program after you developed that new system? you know, maybe even divert some resources spent on that madness you have going in middle east towards keeping an actual worthwhile program going until you had something to switch to, huh?
You're right. NASA is a victim of politics, the economy. Surely anyone who has some familiarty with the russian space program can relate. So yea, I guess counting on Russia for a reliable ride might have been a big mistake.

I also never blamed anyone else for this. You just butted in with an apparent knee jerk Russian defense, while unnecessarily bringing up earlier tragedies. Your implication was silly, and not needed.

also

Shahter wrote:

now you are stuck with "evil ruskies" and you've nobody but yourself to blame.

Shahter wrote:

find the word "evil" in my post above then we'll talk.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7051|Moscow, Russia

Kmar wrote:

Shahter wrote:

Kmar wrote:

Maybe you should change the record, or stick to the subject? We are working on a new heavy launch system as a matter of fact.
maybe you should have closed your glorious shuttle program after you developed that new system? you know, maybe even divert some resources spent on that madness you have going in middle east towards keeping an actual worthwhile program going until you had something to switch to, huh?
You're right. NASA is a victim of politics, the economy. Surely anyone who has some familiarty with the russian space program can relate. So yea, I guess counting on Russia for a reliable ride might have been a big mistake.
russian are very reliable "rides", and you know it. the mistake was allowing them to become your only rides.

I also never blamed anyone else for this. You just butted in with an apparent knee jerk Russian defense, while unnecessarily bringing up earlier tragedies. Your implication was silly, and not needed.
thanks for you opinion on what's needed.

also

Shahter wrote:

now you are stuck with "evil ruskies" and you've nobody but yourself to blame.

Shahter wrote:

find the word "evil" in my post above then we'll talk.
oh, crap, you got me... wait, it wasn't above, man. try again.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6687|'Murka

Cybargs wrote:

Spark wrote:

interesting to say the least

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-31/m … er/2862632

Ecstasy could be modified to treat leukaemia, lymphoma and myeloma, according to chemists at the University of Western Australia.

Associate Professor Matthew Piggott and his team have published papers showing compounds similar to the drug MDMA - also known as ecstasy - have been shown to kill cell lines derived from blood cancers.

The team has previously modified MDMA to try and find a treatment for Parkinson's disease.

But Professor Piggott stresses the drug as it exists now should be avoided as a cure for anything, as the dose required to have an effect is itself deadly.

"To be honest, if we could use ecstasy to treat cancer, I think we should do it. The side-effects of MDMA are minimal compared to curing someone of cancer," he said.

"But I reiterate that MDMA cannot cure someone of cancer."

Professor Piggott says his team has made a number of key modifications to ecstasy as a precursor to developing a treatment.

For a start, its psychoactivity has been removed, while its potency against cancer cells has been boosted 100-fold.

"For a cancer treatment, I guess if there are some psychoactive effects, I mean, if it cures you, who cares?" he said.

"But for other types of treatments like Parkinson's disease people don't want to be high all the time."

He says while his compounds look like ecstasy, they are structurally different.

"It's kind of like buying a Corolla from a car sales yard, and then you start modifying it, you put on a spoiler and you put on some mag wheels and you change the engine," he said.

"You've got something different from what you start off with."

But Professor Piggott says though his trials have been promising, it would be a long time before modified ecstasy is a treatment option.

"Before you even look at human trials, it would be at least five years, maybe five to 10," he said.

The research from the University of Western Australia, in collaboration with the University of Birmingham, was published in the journals Investigational New Drugs and MedChemComm.
I thought ze germans figured that out?
Where's Uzi to tell us he was right all along?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6429|what

https://i.imgur.com/KwxtB.jpg

Earth and the Moon, as seen by Juno. Which was 6 million miles away at the time.

http://news.discovery.com/space/juno-lo … 10830.html
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6877|132 and Bush

Rocket motor tested as NASA plots next phase of program
"Given the great success we've had on these three tests, I think we're close to calling the design good," said Charlie Precourt, vice president and general manager of ATK space launch systems. "If we're successful at that, we could be saving quit a bit of money for the government."
GRAIL is also set to launch Saturday morning.

I <3 Delat II's
http://www.space.com/12889-rocket-glitc … urday.html
Xbone Stormsurgezz
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6687|'Murka

Kmar wrote:

Rocket motor tested as NASA plots next phase of program
"Given the great success we've had on these three tests, I think we're close to calling the design good," said Charlie Precourt, vice president and general manager of ATK space launch systems. "If we're successful at that, we could be saving quit a bit of money for the government."
GRAIL is also set to launch Saturday morning.

I <3 Delat II's
http://www.space.com/12889-rocket-glitc … urday.html
Believe that's the last Delta launch from the East coast. for you.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6877|132 and Bush

Yea, I think there is only one more scheduled to launch from Vandenburg in October.


https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3391/3333947873_272cde15a7_z.jpg?zz=1
Kepler on the end of a Delta II by Kerry Marion, on Flickr

https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3391/3335763977_6d701dc1b4_o.jpg
Kepler Booster Seperation by Kerry Marion, on Flickr
Shot from Tampa.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6877|132 and Bush

CNN wrote:

The European Southern Observatory has just announced the discovery of more than 50 new exoplanets, including 16 super-Earths and one that could be home to life if conditions are right. http://on.cnn.com/nhrqoa Do you believe there’s life in space?
http://on.cnn.com/nhrqoa  "if conditions are right" ..derp
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6951|Canberra, AUS
The list of conditions for life itself to form isn't that long, tbf. Especially if we're talking seriously primitive life (twitchy reproducing bags of chemicals)

Last edited by Spark (2011-09-13 19:25:48)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6877|132 and Bush

Those conditions are also apparently subject to change.
http://ginosblog.com/2010/12/04/redefin … ole-story/

Just saying.. what an incredibly worthless statement to say. "If conditions are right one of those planets could support life". Conversely "if conditions are not right .. it might not support life". This is journalism today, and maybe I see it for more than what it is. However, it seems to me that they are announcing the obvious in order to get people excited (as if there wasn't enough encouraging information already in the story). .. or maybe people are just dumb and they need to be reminded that with the right conditions life could be supported
Xbone Stormsurgezz
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6429|what

Even if the conditions are right, it might not support life.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard