SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6387|North Tonawanda, NY

Spark wrote:

That's the sun... you see the tell-tale eddies on the surface?
And the sunspots, lol
UnkleRukus
That Guy
+236|5293|Massachusetts, USA
Never seen a picture of the sun like that. thats all.
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5614|London, England
So getting back to wanting to live forever... imagine the scientific progress one could make!
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5842

Imagine the amount of sex one could have \o/
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5614|London, England

Macbeth wrote:

Imagine the amount of sex one could have \o/
Meh, one vagina feels like any other.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|6256|...
I wonder if there's a limit to the amount of stuff your brain can keep track of, living forever won't you hit some sort of a natural ceiling before either memory fades or functions start to deteriorate?

Last edited by dayarath (2011-03-09 16:01:05)

inane little opines
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6667|'Murka

JohnG@lt wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Imagine the amount of sex one could have \o/
Meh, one vagina feels like any other.
Oh, I beg to differ. But probably not a proper topic of discussion here...

dayarath wrote:

I wonder if there's a limit to the amount of stuff your brain can keep track of, living forever won't you hit some sort of a natural ceiling before either memory fades or functions start to deteriorate?
I call the day that happens "Thursday".
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6362|eXtreme to the maX

FEOS wrote:

I call the day that happens "Thursday".
I call it three o'clock.
Fuck Israel
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6727

dayarath wrote:

I wonder if there's a limit to the amount of stuff your brain can keep track of, living forever won't you hit some sort of a natural ceiling before either memory fades or functions start to deteriorate?
of course there's a limit to the intellect
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|6256|...
yer it was a bit of a dumb question, but we have no idea of the limit to our brain's power/capacity.

Anyway, I suppose that if you were to be able to live eternally they probably tackled that problem as well - bit of a pointless discussion.
inane little opines
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5614|London, England

Uzique wrote:

dayarath wrote:

I wonder if there's a limit to the amount of stuff your brain can keep track of, living forever won't you hit some sort of a natural ceiling before either memory fades or functions start to deteriorate?
of course there's a limit to the intellect
Proof?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6727

JohnG@lt wrote:

Uzique wrote:

dayarath wrote:

I wonder if there's a limit to the amount of stuff your brain can keep track of, living forever won't you hit some sort of a natural ceiling before either memory fades or functions start to deteriorate?
of course there's a limit to the intellect
Proof?
proof? basic neuroscience. our brains have a limited number of braincells and neurons. knowledge is potentially infinite. our biology isn't. if you want 'evidence' of this basic proof: look back into your own memory. why can't you remember every single thing that has happened to you since birth, like one big photo-series? why has your memory not retained all this information, if our ability to attain and retain knowledge is 'infinite'? you must exercise the intellect regularly to keep these 'connections' active and alive, and even then there are a limited number of these connections in any one individual's brain.

Last edited by Uzique (2011-03-10 07:39:36)

libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5614|London, England

Uzique wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Uzique wrote:


of course there's a limit to the intellect
Proof?
proof? basic neuroscience. our brains have a limited number of braincells and neurons. knowledge is potentially infinite. our biology isn't.
And we use what percent of those neurons? And we know what about how they store info?

Right.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6727
what does it matter how much we know about the intricacies of the brain? it is more than apparent that we can not retain infinite knowledge.

the reason 'why' has little to do with the 'what' of the matter
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6727
i mean why is the onus on me to prove that our brain's AREN'T infinite. you're a great living example of my argument, for starters.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5614|London, England

Uzique wrote:

what does it matter how much we know about the intricacies of the brain? it is more than apparent that we can not retain infinite knowledge.

the reason 'why' has little to do with the 'what' of the matter
You are saying that it's impossible. We're talking about living forever, you don't think in that time frame that someone won't figure out a way to remap our brains or find a way to download it to a disk drive or something? If anything, it will be like the Matrix where you plug your brain into a computer and suddenly you know Kung Fu. We're in the realm of sci fi here zique.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5614|London, England

Uzique wrote:

i mean why is the onus on me to prove that our brain's AREN'T infinite. you're a great living example of my argument, for starters.
You made a statement, I told you to prove it, and now you're telling me that it's my job to disprove you? That's funny shit right there.

Ok zique, I assert that the sky is purple. I provide no proof. Now disprove me.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6727

JohnG@lt wrote:

Uzique wrote:

what does it matter how much we know about the intricacies of the brain? it is more than apparent that we can not retain infinite knowledge.

the reason 'why' has little to do with the 'what' of the matter
You are saying that it's impossible. We're talking about living forever, you don't think in that time frame that someone won't figure out a way to remap our brains or find a way to download it to a disk drive or something? If anything, it will be like the Matrix where you plug your brain into a computer and suddenly you know Kung Fu. We're in the realm of sci fi here zique.
wtf does that have to do with putting off the process of ageing and death?

our brain has a limited capacity

all this sci-fi bollocks is completely tangential
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6857|132 and Bush

speaking of infinite..

Have you guys ever read or studied the topic of fractals (Geometry/Nature)? I watched this the other night. Very interesting.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|7028|PNW

MAKE THE MUSIC STOP!

e: I was sure I pasted the vid...

FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6667|'Murka

Uzique wrote:

what does it matter how much we know about the intricacies of the brain? it is more than apparent that we can not retain infinite knowledge.

the reason 'why' has little to do with the 'what' of the matter
Actually, it's been scientifically proven there are some people who remember every single event of their lives from an early age and can access them on demand. It's called hyperthymesia.

We do not know how data is stored in our brains. The theory is that it is chemically stored, but it could very well be stored in a quantum manner within our neurons. We really don't know. Thus, it's entirely possible that we can retain infinite knowledge, were we to live long enough. It's also entirely possible that there is a limit. It's unknowable at this point.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6931|Canberra, AUS
nah there is a limit. a really stupid limitt, but a limit nonetheless
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6857|132 and Bush

Poor guys, I think I'd rather land out in the middle of the ocean.

Expedition 26 Flight Engineer Oleg Skripochka, left, Flight Engineer Alexander Kaleri, center, and Commander Scott Kelly, sit in chairs outside the Soyuz Capsule just minutes after they landed near the town of Arkalyk, Kazakhstan on Wednesday, March 16, 2011. NASA Astronaut Kelly, Russian Cosmonauts Skripochka and Kaleri are returning from almost six months onboard the International Space Station where they served as members of the Expedition 25 and 26 crews. Photo Credit: (NASA/Bill Ingalls)
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7032|Moscow, Russia
actually, landing in the middle of an ocean could be a lot more discomforting. kazakhstan is very continental, meaning, even though it's probably well bellow zero there atm, it doesn't feel all that cold.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6857|132 and Bush

In a "long shot" theory, physicists propose that the world's largest atom smasher could be used as a time machine to send a special kind of matter backward in time.
The scientists outline a way to use the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a 17-mile-long particle accelerator buried underground near Geneva, to send a hypothetical particle called the Higgs singlet to the past.
There are a lot of "ifs" to the conjecture, including the major question of whether or not the Higgs singlet even exists and could be created in the machine.
"Our theory is a long shot, but it doesn't violate any laws of physics or experimental constraints," physicist Tom Weiler of Vanderbilt University said in a statement.
However, if the theory proves correct, the researchers say the method could be used to send messages to the past or the future.
More..
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42100367/ns … e-science/

Actually i thought we already had this conclusion. In fact..
Time traveler

According to several reputable sources, Sergei holds the current known record for time travel by a human being. In his over 748 days aboard Mir (cumulative across three missions) he went approximately 17,000 mph and traveled roughly 0.02 seconds (20 milliseconds) into the future,[1] which is considerably more than any other human being. A common misconception is that the Apollo astronauts hold the record—they did go faster than Avdeyev, but they were only in space for a few days.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Avdeyev
I thought the theory basically went "As you get closer to the speed of light you "lose" time. The longer you maintain that speed the more time you lose."
Xbone Stormsurgezz

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard