1680x1050 dump

2010-02-24 07:10:55

#1

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5780|Catherine Black

https://thumbnails26.imagebam.com/6948/8f0b4f69472377.gif

https://thumbnails26.imagebam.com/6948/f7c9da69472379.gif

https://thumbnails27.imagebam.com/6948/91f2a269472382.gif

https://thumbnails7.imagebam.com/6948/46cdea69472383.gif

https://thumbnails24.imagebam.com/6948/f47a6569472385.gif

https://thumbnails3.imagebam.com/6948/c22e7769472386.gif

https://thumbnails26.imagebam.com/6948/e7eb5469472388.gif

https://thumbnails6.imagebam.com/6948/a2fb3369472389.gif

https://thumbnails20.imagebam.com/6948/46806469472391.gif

https://thumbnails24.imagebam.com/6948/65a1ac69472393.gif

https://thumbnails22.imagebam.com/6948/c102eb69472395.gif

https://thumbnails20.imagebam.com/6948/c3c21969472396.gif

https://thumbnails26.imagebam.com/6948/cfe10669472397.gif

https://thumbnails8.imagebam.com/6948/0daf0d69472399.gif

https://thumbnails28.imagebam.com/6948/0af07969472400.gif

https://thumbnails26.imagebam.com/6948/3e902e69472402.gif

https://thumbnails24.imagebam.com/6948/3b3a0969472404.gif

https://thumbnails20.imagebam.com/6948/2fb83f69472406.gif

https://thumbnails3.imagebam.com/6948/aba08669472407.gif

https://thumbnails6.imagebam.com/6948/3fc87169472410.gif

https://thumbnails26.imagebam.com/6948/01016e69472413.gif

Enjoy.

Add more if you want.

2010-02-24 07:22:06

#2

FloppY_: +1,010|6278|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

No thx mate, I got google & TinyEye

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2010-02-24 14:55:48

#3

tazz.: oz.; +1,338|6166|Sydney | ♥

not big enough.

1920x1080 i need

^{everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... _{seriously. ♥}}

2010-02-24 15:14:31

#4

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5780|Catherine Black

tazz. wrote:
not big enough.

1920x1080 i need

16:9 is for fags

1920x is for fags with too much cash to spend on their GPU

but have this anyway

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/33829/turretlightpurpletl5.jpg

2010-02-24 15:16:10

#5

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|6835|Reykjavík, Iceland.

Finray wrote:
tazz. wrote:
not big enough.

1920x1080 i need
16:9 is for fags

1920x is for fags with too much cash to spend on their GPU

but have this anyway

http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/33829 … pletl5.jpg

GPU? I would be using 1920x1200 if my monitor supported it. But alas, it's 1680x1050.

2010-02-24 16:02:56

#6

rdx-fx: ...; +955|6583

Finray wrote:
tazz. wrote:
not big enough.

1920x1080 i need
16:9 is for fags

1920x is for fags with too much cash to spend on their GPU

Nah, you're just a slacker.

My laptop display is 1920x1080 (Lenovo T61p), as are both my PC displays.

Too many years of CAD work on low-res screens is hard on the eyes.

2010-02-24 16:04:37

#7

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6489

what Cad progs, rdx?

2010-02-24 17:11:28

#8

Ilocano: buuuurrrrrrppppp.......; +341|6659

rdx-fx wrote:
Finray wrote:
tazz. wrote:
not big enough.

1920x1080 i need
16:9 is for fags

1920x is for fags with too much cash to spend on their GPU
Nah, you're just a slacker.

My laptop display is 1920x1080 (Lenovo T61p), as are both my PC displays.

Too many years of CAD work on low-res screens is hard on the eyes.

Pfft. 1920x1200 on my 17" LED backlit LCD laptop. Awesome for photo editing on the go.

2010-02-24 23:31:43

#9

rdx-fx: ...; +955|6583

burnzz wrote:
what Cad progs, rdx?

Autocad (from r9.. damn, I'm feeling old), Solidworks, Pro/E

2010-02-25 06:50:13

#10

TimmmmaaaaH: Damn, I... had something for this; +725|6431|Brisbane, Australia

Finray wrote:
tazz. wrote:
not big enough.

1920x1080 i need
16:9 is for fags

1920x is for fags with too much cash to spend on their GPU

but have this anyway

http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/33829 … pletl5.jpg

I have a 16:9 1920 screen and a 1920 16:10 screen, do I win some kind of fag prize?

https://bf3s.com/sigs/5e6a35c97adb20771c7b713312c0307c23a7a36a.png

2010-02-25 06:55:23

#11

Jenspm: penis; +1,716|6724|St. Andrews / Oslo

I thought this was gonna be a 1680x1050 picture of poop.

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png

2010-02-25 08:45:14

#12

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5780|Catherine Black

TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
Finray wrote:
tazz. wrote:
not big enough.

1920x1080 i need
16:9 is for fags

1920x is for fags with too much cash to spend on their GPU

but have this anyway

http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/33829 … pletl5.jpg
I have a 16:9 1920 screen and a 1920 16:10 screen, do I win some kind of fag prize?

Well having a 16:9 1920x1080 scores you two fag points. Having a 16:10 scores you -1 fag point, but since it's 1920 gives you another.

You have a net gain of 2 Fag rating.

Compared to mine (-2) you're quite a fag.

2010-02-25 08:53:59

#13

Ilocano: buuuurrrrrrppppp.......; +341|6659

Smokers in the house?....

2010-02-25 13:29:56

#14

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6734|FUCK UBISOFT

Finray wrote:
TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
Finray wrote:

16:9 is for fags

1920x is for fags with too much cash to spend on their GPU

but have this anyway

http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/33829 … pletl5.jpg
I have a 16:9 1920 screen and a 1920 16:10 screen, do I win some kind of fag prize?
Well having a 16:9 1920x1080 scores you two fag points. Having a 16:10 scores you -1 fag point, but since it's 1920 gives you another.

You have a net gain of 2 Fag rating.

Compared to mine (-2) you're quite a fag.

well you have those 2 1280x1024s, so you're pure fag.

2010-02-25 13:55:44

#15

CammRobb: Banned; +1,510|6122|Carnoustie MASSIF

Ilocano wrote:
Smokers in the house?....

?

2010-02-25 13:57:49

#16

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5780|Catherine Black

1280x1024 is leet.

2010-02-25 13:59:00

#17

FloppY_: +1,010|6278|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Finray wrote:
1280x1024 is leet.

Meh, since I got my 1680x1050 I've wondered how I got by on my 1280x1024, shits' nearly square dude...

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2010-02-25 14:04:56

#18

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5780|Catherine Black

I've got my 1280x1024 sitting as a secondary monitor, and yes it is square

2010-02-25 14:08:34

#19

FloppY_: +1,010|6278|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Finray wrote:
I've got my 1280x1024 sitting as a secondary monitor, and yes it is square

I've done the same with mine,,, we have the same setup except my 1680x1050 is a 20"

I stopped using my old monitor though, 512mb of ATi choked in games when running duals

Now it's connected to my print server, which means I never use it...

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2010-02-25 14:08:48

#20

CammRobb: Banned; +1,510|6122|Carnoustie MASSIF

Finray wrote:
I've got my 1280x1024 sitting as a secondary monitor, and yes it is square

fuck y'all, I have a 1600x1200 primary and a 1280x1024 secondary

2010-02-25 14:09:46

#21

FloppY_: +1,010|6278|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

CammRobb wrote:
Finray wrote:
I've got my 1280x1024 sitting as a secondary monitor, and yes it is square
fuck y'all, I have a 1600x1200 primary and a 1280x1024 secondary

We got 1680x1050 & 1280x1024...

which you'd know if you'd kept up with the thread...

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2010-02-25 14:11:23

#22

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5780|Catherine Black

1600x1200 is a lot less square though. Look at this image, turned the other way.

https://www.koalafish.com/pics/pigeon_sunset_1200x1600.jpg

2010-02-25 14:20:02

#23

FloppY_: +1,010|6278|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Finray wrote:
1600x1200 is a lot less square though. Look at this image, turned the other way.

http://www.koalafish.com/pics/pigeon_su … 0x1600.jpg

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/9b/Vector_Video_Standards2.png

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2010-02-25 14:23:20

#24

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5780|Catherine Black

Thanks for that not-really-related-to-my-point picture, Floppz.

2010-02-25 14:28:01

#25

FloppY_: +1,010|6278|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Finray wrote:
Thanks for that not-really-related-to-my-point picture, Floppz.

Meh it's 23:27 and I'm ~8 hours of sleep short this week in total...

What I meant so state with above picture... is that it doesn't get much more square than 5:4

except for my 320x320 Smartphone, but that hardly counts :p

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

BF2S Forums 1680x1050 dump

tazz. wrote:

Finray wrote:

tazz. wrote:

Finray wrote:

tazz. wrote:

rdx-fx wrote:

Finray wrote:

tazz. wrote:

burnzz wrote:

Finray wrote:

tazz. wrote:

TimmmmaaaaH wrote:

Finray wrote:

tazz. wrote:

Finray wrote:

TimmmmaaaaH wrote:

Finray wrote:

Ilocano wrote:

Finray wrote:

Finray wrote:

Finray wrote:

CammRobb wrote:

Finray wrote:

Finray wrote:

Finray wrote:

Board footer