Seems a bit like an easy way out to say: I like fat women because of my culture. No, YOU just like fat women.
no need. Back when I was single, all it took was going to the UCLA food court while I was taking extensions courses.Uzique wrote:
or just come to my parties, broIlocano wrote:
Easy, really. Be a professional photographer.Uzique wrote:
well i don't know about literal 'supermodels'... how many 'supermodels' are there on the planet? what is a supermodel? but sure, a girl that's pretty enough to make a decent amount of money/opportunity modelling on the side... or has a modelling portfolio. quite a lot of girls in the 17-25 bracket fulfill those criteria if you look in the right places / hang out in the right circles.
lol at the replies because someone pointed out the chubby girl is chubby
♥
it's like a rush of internet white knights, ostensibly defending the girl but really defending their wounded wank-egos
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Only reason i got in here was because there was a discussion on whether a girl was fat or not.
I'm tired of this and I'm going to bed. But who am i, not to leave you with one final message before i depart?
She's fat. Deal with it
She's fat. Deal with it
Last edited by Kampframmer (2011-02-22 16:15:14)
Uzique wrote:
is that a polite way of saying 'americans don't mind fat sweaty bitches that are out of shape'?
i think it is.
All I'm saying is 'fat' is an exaggeration.Uzique wrote:
it's like a rush of internet white knights, ostensibly defending the girl but really defending their wounded wank-egos
===
Kampframmer wrote:
Only reason i got in here was because there was a discussion on whether a girl was fat or not.
yeah that girl really isn't fat. you could call her chubby, but 'fat' looks completely different (and much more gross)
She's still so annoying I want to punch her repeatedly in the face.
I'd handcuff her.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
She's still so annoying I want to punch her repeatedly in the face.
to the bumper of a car? you bastard!AussieReaper wrote:
I'd handcuff her.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
She's still so annoying I want to punch her repeatedly in the face.
More convenient that way.burnzz wrote:
to the bumper of a car? you bastard!AussieReaper wrote:
I'd handcuff her.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
She's still so annoying I want to punch her repeatedly in the face.
You ever drag a body from your basement into the boot of your car?
It's a pain in the ass.
why no, never bring it home. unless you plan to eat it later . . .AussieReaper wrote:
More convenient that way.burnzz wrote:
to the bumper of a car? you bastard!AussieReaper wrote:
I'd handcuff her.
You ever drag a body from your basement into the boot of your car?
It's a pain in the ass.
I watched the videos with the sound muted. I can't see what all the fuss is about her weight. Gf material? Doubtful. Shaggable? Absolutely. She's cute, young, has giant tits and is probably fun in the sack. What's not to like?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Really. It's that simple. Nothing more. Damn youth and their need for long term relationships...JohnG@lt wrote:
I watched the videos with the sound muted. I can't see what all the fuss is about her weight. Gf material? Doubtful. Shaggable? Absolutely. She's cute, young, has giant tits and is probably fun in the sack. What's not to like?
Wimp. You aren't a man if you can't carry a limp female body...AussieReaper wrote:
More convenient that way.burnzz wrote:
to the bumper of a car? you bastard!AussieReaper wrote:
I'd handcuff her.
You ever drag a body from your basement into the boot of your car?
It's a pain in the ass.
I guess it takes a bit of experience to understand that not every lay requires love and or thoughts of long term commitment.Ilocano wrote:
Really. It's that simple. Nothing more. Damn youth and their need for long term relationships...JohnG@lt wrote:
I watched the videos with the sound muted. I can't see what all the fuss is about her weight. Gf material? Doubtful. Shaggable? Absolutely. She's cute, young, has giant tits and is probably fun in the sack. What's not to like?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
But she's pretty fat.Ilocano wrote:
Really. It's that simple. Nothing more. Damn youth and their need for long term relationships...JohnG@lt wrote:
I watched the videos with the sound muted. I can't see what all the fuss is about her weight. Gf material? Doubtful. Shaggable? Absolutely. She's cute, young, has giant tits and is probably fun in the sack. What's not to like?Wimp. You aren't a man if you can't carry a limp female body...AussieReaper wrote:
More convenient that way.burnzz wrote:
to the bumper of a car? you bastard!
You ever drag a body from your basement into the boot of your car?
It's a pain in the ass.
how many more times is finray going to bump this thread just so everyone can say how horrible the girl is
i bet 2
i bet 2
But short.AussieReaper wrote:
But she's pretty fat.
That only helps if you're rolling her downhill or off a cliff.Ilocano wrote:
But short.AussieReaper wrote:
But she's pretty fat.
hahahaha, rightJohnG@lt wrote:
I guess it takes a bit of experience to understand that not every lay requires love and or thoughts of long term commitment.Ilocano wrote:
Really. It's that simple. Nothing more. Damn youth and their need for long term relationships...JohnG@lt wrote:
I watched the videos with the sound muted. I can't see what all the fuss is about her weight. Gf material? Doubtful. Shaggable? Absolutely. She's cute, young, has giant tits and is probably fun in the sack. What's not to like?
so the implication now is that us 'young ones' don't have any one-night stands or meaningless sexual encounters under our belts?
just because we don't find mrs. mcpork over here attractive?
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
notice the at the end? It was in jest.Uzique wrote:
hahahaha, rightJohnG@lt wrote:
I guess it takes a bit of experience to understand that not every lay requires love and or thoughts of long term commitment.Ilocano wrote:
Really. It's that simple. Nothing more. Damn youth and their need for long term relationships...
so the implication now is that us 'young ones' don't have any one-night stands or meaningless sexual encounters under our belts?
just because we don't find mrs. mcpork over here attractive?
How is she fat at all?Uzique wrote:
hahahaha, rightJohnG@lt wrote:
I guess it takes a bit of experience to understand that not every lay requires love and or thoughts of long term commitment.Ilocano wrote:
Really. It's that simple. Nothing more. Damn youth and their need for long term relationships...
so the implication now is that us 'young ones' don't have any one-night stands or meaningless sexual encounters under our belts?
just because we don't find mrs. mcpork over here attractive?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
European standards.
higher standards than you
she's chubby
she's chubby
♥