considering F7P's area of interest, i don't see how this question is relevant to an entire thread.
Poll
Which CPU?
| Celeron D 330 (2,66GHz, 256kB L2, 533MHz FSB) | 5% | 5% - 2 | ||||
| Athlon 64 3200+ (2,2GHz, 512kB L2, 800MHz HT) | 73% | 73% - 28 | ||||
| Athlon XP 2500+ (2,4GHz(OC), 512kB L2, 300-ish MHz FSB) | 21% | 21% - 8 | ||||
| Total: 38 | ||||||
There at least used to be a glitch in PDF reader that if kept scrolling the CPU core load was at 100%.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
You probably have a slightly faster computer, too. The old CPU did about 1GFlops. A Celeron E3200 - a 30€ CPU of today - does 8.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
OK, I've never seen a PDF cause such high CPU overhead.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP