Either fucking way he is a really really shit actor...baggs wrote:
nah that was coming of age Anakin Skywalker.Winston_Churchill wrote:
Hayden Christiensen or something like thatjsnipy wrote:
the kid who played young Anakin and his mother. Ruined stars (more). I can't be bothered to find their names.
He was terrible too. Agree.coke wrote:
Either fucking way he is a really really shit actor...baggs wrote:
nah that was coming of age Anakin Skywalker.Winston_Churchill wrote:
Hayden Christiensen or something like that
Keanu Reaves is terrible.
Nicholas Cage in Ghost Rider was awful. Matchstick men, much better.
Quentin Tarentino. The man is an amazing director, but can't act worth a crap. Sorry Tarentino.
Bevo wrote:
He was terrible too. Agree.coke wrote:
Either fucking way he is a really really shit actor...baggs wrote:
nah that was coming of age Anakin Skywalker.
Keanu Reaves is terrible.
Nicholas Cage in Ghost Rider was awful. Matchstick men, much better.
Quentin Tarentino. The man cant act or direct worth a crap. Sorry Tarentino.
Heretic.Winston_Churchill wrote:
Quentin Tarentino. The man cant act or direct worth a crap. Sorry Tarentino.
He's a woman, don't listen to him.Bevo wrote:
Heretic.Winston_Churchill wrote:
Quentin Tarentino. The man cant act or direct worth a crap. Sorry Tarentino.
At least I like Up.Miggle wrote:
He's a woman, don't listen to him.Bevo wrote:
Heretic.Winston_Churchill wrote:
Quentin Tarentino. The man cant act or direct worth a crap. Sorry Tarentino.
And have a soul
You mean horny adolescent Anakin?baggs wrote:
nah that was coming of age Anakin Skywalker.Winston_Churchill wrote:
Hayden Christiensen or something like thatjsnipy wrote:
the kid who played young Anakin and his mother. Ruined stars (more). I can't be bothered to find their names.
They were both absolutely dreadfull in any case. I would have mentioned the little one myself, but I too don't know his name. Also:
Nathalie Portman as Amidala and Jar Jar Binks
Tom Cruise for being a fucking nut.
Yeah but Portman's hot so she has kudo's there.Lai wrote:
You mean horny adolescent Anakin?baggs wrote:
nah that was coming of age Anakin Skywalker.Winston_Churchill wrote:
Hayden Christiensen or something like that
They were both absolutely dreadfull in any case. I would have mentioned the little one myself, but I too don't know his name. Also:
Nathalie Portman as Amidala and Jar Jar Binks
Ben Affleck
Colin Farrell (except for maybe In Bruges)
Did you watch Valkyrie? I think he played that role good.Miggle wrote:
Tom Cruise
He was good in Collateral..Sup wrote:
Did you watch Valkyrie? I think he played that role good.Miggle wrote:
Tom Cruise
Nic Cage has had some good movies, but also very bad ones. The Family Man, The Rock and Con Air he was excellent in. He's also been terrible in movies as well though - The Wicker Man being the most notable.
Valkyrie was terrible, especially because of him..Sup wrote:
Did you watch Valkyrie? I think he played that role good.Miggle wrote:
Tom Cruise
THEY'RE IN MY ASS!Poseidon wrote:
Nic Cage has had some good movies, but also very bad ones. The Family Man, The Rock and Con Air he was excellent in. He's also been terrible in movies as well though - The Wicker Man being the most notable.
The Wicker Man was just a shit movie though.
Personally, a good half of the actors in the industry are shite. You'd be better off asking for good actors.
Personally, a good half of the actors in the industry are shite. You'd be better off asking for good actors.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
Have you seen the original?Flecco wrote:
The Wicker Man was just a shit movie though.
It's pretty epic.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
Nick is great in Drama's or thriller's assuming the movie itself isn't shit to begin with, but he always sells out for the action flicks because they gross more and then he becomes a sarcastic douche. Lord of War was an amazing movie.Miggle wrote:
Valkyrie was terrible, especially because of him..Sup wrote:
Did you watch Valkyrie? I think he played that role good.Miggle wrote:
Tom CruiseTHEY'RE IN MY ASS!Poseidon wrote:
Nic Cage has had some good movies, but also very bad ones. The Family Man, The Rock and Con Air he was excellent in. He's also been terrible in movies as well though - The Wicker Man being the most notable.
Mannequin Skywalker.Winston_Churchill wrote:
Hayden Christiensen or something like thatjsnipy wrote:
the kid who played young Anakin and his mother. Ruined stars (more). I can't be bothered to find their names.
Last edited by N00bkilla55404 (2009-12-05 15:02:59)
No, you see, now people are just being stupid.
Just because Tom Cruise is a cunt and a worthless wankshaft, that doesn't mean you should brand him as a shit actor. Because the fact is. He isn't.
He may not be Kevin Spacey standard, or Jack Nicholson, but he does pull off his roles just fine.
He was very very good in Collateral, and anybody who says differently is just a tool. He was good in Valkyrie, he pulled it off, and whilst another actor may have been better, he managed very well and made the movie pretty entertaining.
He was FUCKING FANTASTIC in The Last Samurai (and if you haven't seen that movie, I suggest you go watch it)
He was VERY good in A Few Good Men. He put on the role very well and really gave the movie something to watch for, other than just the plot.
He was also good in Magnolia.
Anybody who says he's a shit actor is just a douche. You are ignorant film critics. Very ignorant ones.
Just because Tom Cruise is a cunt and a worthless wankshaft, that doesn't mean you should brand him as a shit actor. Because the fact is. He isn't.
He may not be Kevin Spacey standard, or Jack Nicholson, but he does pull off his roles just fine.
He was very very good in Collateral, and anybody who says differently is just a tool. He was good in Valkyrie, he pulled it off, and whilst another actor may have been better, he managed very well and made the movie pretty entertaining.
He was FUCKING FANTASTIC in The Last Samurai (and if you haven't seen that movie, I suggest you go watch it)
He was VERY good in A Few Good Men. He put on the role very well and really gave the movie something to watch for, other than just the plot.
He was also good in Magnolia.
Anybody who says he's a shit actor is just a douche. You are ignorant film critics. Very ignorant ones.
Tom Cruise is only any good when he's doing comedy. And aside from Tropic Thunder and that Scientology recruitment video, he hasn't done much as of late.
This, the only time he's ever played a different role than usual is Tropic Thunder, and he was great in that.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Tom Cruise is only any good when he's doing comedy. And aside from Tropic Thunder and that Scientology recruitment video, he hasn't done much as of late.
I actually think Tom Cruise is decent in more serious films. Take Rain Man and Valkyrie for example.
I just think it's become fashionable to bash him.
There is no defending Keanu Reeves though, awful actor.
I just think it's become fashionable to bash him.
There is no defending Keanu Reeves though, awful actor.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
He was amazingly annoying in Rain Man.Switch wrote:
I actually think Tom Cruise is decent in more serious films. Take Rain Man and Valkyrie for example.
I just think it's become fashionable to bash him.
There is no defending Keanu Reeves though, awful actor.
I think he was good in Matrix ...... role suited him very well ..... orginally they were hoping for Will S but he backed out for Wild Wild West ...... I could not picture Will as NeoSwitch wrote:
I actually think Tom Cruise is decent in more serious films. Take Rain Man and Valkyrie for example.
I just think it's become fashionable to bash him.
There is no defending Keanu Reeves though, awful actor.
You're kidding me? King Leonidas? hello?Miggle wrote:
Gerard Butler
edit: if you ignore his scottish accent sneaking in and out and back in again of course
Last edited by I'm Jamesey (2009-12-05 15:28:22)
hello.I'm Jamesey wrote:
You're kidding me? King Leonidas? hello?Miggle wrote:
Gerard Butler
300 was a terrible movie.
300 was a terrible movie, but it wasn't because of Butler. It was because the filming was shit, the story was terrible, it was badly executed and it was the wrong choice of actors. Not Butlers fault it was miserably poor.Miggle wrote:
hello.I'm Jamesey wrote:
You're kidding me? King Leonidas? hello?Miggle wrote:
Gerard Butler
300 was a terrible movie.