among other, yes. khruschev build his whole post-stalin career on shitting on his predecessor.
uziq wrote:propaganda from whom? khrushchev?
a lot of it is.please stop making out like criticisms and denunciations of stalin are western propaganda.
no, he didn't. he was idolized by overwhelming majority of the people he ruled over, even huge smear campaign by khruschev couldn't change that.he presided over a society ruled by fear
many who didn't understand their role in ideological framework of a nation at war, yes. and many more who did understand that role fared very well under stalin - one even got a nobel prize for literature.and many artists rightfully feared for their lives.
yep. fucking idiots.you call them 'fucktards'.
supporting revolution with no understanding of that revolution doesn't mean much. in fact, it could be very well used by enemies of said revolution, as is the case with a lot of fucktards i'm talking about.how very revolutionary of you. never mind that many of the artists were revolutionaries themselves who had fallen foul of a foul-tempered and insecure tyrant.
not totally lost. misled something awful, yes, but you'll get there.but ok, we are lost to 'propaganda'.
Last edited by Shahter (2020-10-19 08:56:52)