I really hope you're joking.HaiBai wrote:
how is subway not healthy?Jaekus wrote:
Yeah, you keep doing it and your body has no choice but to adjust.
I've noticed over the past few weeks I'm slowly getting off track here. Haven't done a 3x workouts in a week for 4-5 weeks now, and I've been drinking more and eating a bit more shit food, eg. I had subway for lunch yesterday and a pizza for dinner, but I was at a LAN and had no access to a supermarket to buy anything healthy. I did make an effort the other night not to get takeaway and instead find a late night supermarket to buy a chicken breast and a couple tomatoes to put with some salad I had at home so I'm not completely off track.
Anyone have any good methods for getting their motivation back? I did buy some new jeans a size smaller which was great (down from a 34" waist to a 32), except it now accentuates the fat I still have to lose
lol
its not that bad apart from the sodium...Zimmer wrote:
I really hope you're joking.HaiBai wrote:
how is subway not healthy?Jaekus wrote:
Yeah, you keep doing it and your body has no choice but to adjust.
I've noticed over the past few weeks I'm slowly getting off track here. Haven't done a 3x workouts in a week for 4-5 weeks now, and I've been drinking more and eating a bit more shit food, eg. I had subway for lunch yesterday and a pizza for dinner, but I was at a LAN and had no access to a supermarket to buy anything healthy. I did make an effort the other night not to get takeaway and instead find a late night supermarket to buy a chicken breast and a couple tomatoes to put with some salad I had at home so I'm not completely off track.
Anyone have any good methods for getting their motivation back? I did buy some new jeans a size smaller which was great (down from a 34" waist to a 32), except it now accentuates the fat I still have to lose
if you have to eat out, subway is definately the obvious choice if you want to eat healthy
guys a footlong chicken bacon ranch sub with a bag of cheddar and sour cream chips is healthy, because it's from subway and everyone knows "eat fresh" means everything is less than 300 calories!!
subway's healthiER than other fast food places but there's still plenty of bad choices that can be made there
subway's healthiER than other fast food places but there's still plenty of bad choices that can be made there
obviously, but there's nothing wrong with turkey and pepperjack on wheat with a bunch of vegetables. (apart from the sodium, but i barely have any in my diet anyway so its all good)Poseidon wrote:
guys a footlong chicken bacon ranch sub with a bag of cheddar and sour cream chips is healthy, because it's from subway and everyone knows "eat fresh" means everything is less than 300 calories!!
subway's healthiER than other fast food places but there's still plenty of bad choices that can be made there
lol. High level of sodium, bread, processed cheese, mayonnaise/sauces with a lot of bad fat/grease.HaiBai wrote:
if you have to eat out, subway is definately the obvious choice if you want to eat healthy
Maybe if you just had the bread and chicken with salad it would be okay, but any of the other fillings like italian and ranch are full of greasy fat and little nutrition.
Not even close to a healthy place to eat out.
of course i don't have any sauces/fillings.Zimmer wrote:
lol. High level of sodium, bread, processed cheese, mayonnaise/sauces with a lot of bad fat/grease.HaiBai wrote:
if you have to eat out, subway is definately the obvious choice if you want to eat healthy
Maybe if you just had the bread and chicken with salad it would be okay, but any of the other fillings like italian and ranch are full of greasy fat and little nutrition.
Not even close to a healthy place to eat out.
i'm curious though, where do you go if you have to eat out but want something healthy?
bullshit zimmer. a grilled chicken salad from subway is just fine for take out food.Zimmer wrote:
lol. High level of sodium, bread, processed cheese, mayonnaise/sauces with a lot of bad fat/grease.HaiBai wrote:
if you have to eat out, subway is definately the obvious choice if you want to eat healthy
Maybe if you just had the bread and chicken with salad it would be okay, but any of the other fillings like italian and ranch are full of greasy fat and little nutrition.
Not even close to a healthy place to eat out.
who made you the expert anyway?
Last edited by 11 Bravo (2011-04-17 09:14:12)
A lot of bodybuilders mix fastfood in their diet, getting fastfood every few months doesnt affect your health either.
Last edited by Shocking (2011-04-17 09:20:17)
inane little opines
i agree with 11b.
also, lol at you guys saying i suck mehdi's dick.
ironic because you all suck zimmer's dick
also, lol at you guys saying i suck mehdi's dick.
ironic because you all suck zimmer's dick
Yeah, because we agree with him that subway isn't healthy
nothing is really that healthy. your chicken, tuna, protein shakes, etc all have shit in them. and you can eat healthy at subway. no worse than most the stuff you all eat all day. fucking hell.Jebus wrote:
Yeah, because we agree with him that subway isn't healthy
lol at rage.HaiBai wrote:
i agree with 11b.
also, lol at you guys saying i suck mehdi's dick.
ironic because you all suck zimmer's dick
u srs?baggs wrote:
lol at rage.HaiBai wrote:
i agree with 11b.
also, lol at you guys saying i suck mehdi's dick.
ironic because you all suck zimmer's dick
FUCKING HELL GUYS. YEAH.11 Bravo wrote:
nothing is really that healthy. your chicken, tuna, protein shakes, etc all have shit in them. and you can eat healthy at subway. no worse than most the stuff you all eat all day. fucking hell.Jebus wrote:
Yeah, because we agree with him that subway isn't healthy
pffft
This weekend I've been out to a curry, on the piss, 2x macdonalds.
HaiBai wrote:
i agree with 11b.
also, lol at you guys saying i suck mehdi's dick.
ironic because you all suck zimmer's dick
Not sure where I heard it either... it was years ago now. If anything I think would impact your forearms more, as there is less use of the wrist.Zimmer wrote:
Because I'm on a 5 day split now, I can do hammer curls, preacher curls and barbell curls. Not sure where you got "hammer curls are good for building peak", they're the opposite of that because you're not tensing the peak when doing hammer curls. Hammer curls are great for bulking up the biceps and toning it from top to bottom (specifically missing out the peak) and also toning your forearms.Kmar wrote:
What types of curls do you guys prefer for your bi's? I've heard in the past that hammer curls are good for building your peak. I'm not a fan of preacher curls myself. I used to try to isolate the muscles I was working on. Now I like to get other muscles involved. Preacher curls take a lot of the stress off of the shoulders.
I love preacher curls, but they have to be done right to get the proper workout from them. You must tense like nobodys business at the peak and then a controlled movement back down, feeling the biceps work all the way through. If you put no tension it usually feels like a wasted exercise.
However, the barbell curl is still the greatest method for building bis.
Barbell rows are also very very good for building bicep muscle.
@ Jaekus: Negative sets are when you concentrate on the lowering of the exercise, not the elevating. They are good exercises, but should not be done frequently.
Drop sets are when you lower the weight for the next set after muscle failure has been achieved.
The key to drop sets is to pickup the lower weight as soon as you hit muscles failure. I'll get down to 10 lb dumbells and be on the brink of tears to lift them.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
So it's hitting to failure and then reducing weight to keep going?
some days the gym is boring as fuck and i wonder what the cunt i am doing there...
...then i see some fat people...
OH YEAH! o/
...then i see some fat people...
OH YEAH! o/
\obaggs wrote:
some days the gym is boring as fuck and i wonder what the cunt i am doing there...
...then i see some fat people...
OH YEAH! o/
\o/
♥
Yes, drop and go.. and keep doing it until you cant lift your arms to pick your nose.Jaekus wrote:
So it's hitting to failure and then reducing weight to keep going?
lol
Xbone Stormsurgezz