That's unenvironmental.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Y'all ever do controlled burns?
No really, we used to do that down here but we had to stop when the Greens complained.
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
That's unenvironmental.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Y'all ever do controlled burns?
Seriously? So you get a tinder box all ready waiting for ignition... Dang. Controlled burns coencide with responsible land management. F'n greenies.Cheez wrote:
That's unenvironmental.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Y'all ever do controlled burns?
No really, we used to do that down here but we had to stop when the Greens complained.
we do do controlled burns. this year was a travesty as far as I'm concerned. everyone is saying that this year is gonna be a shocker and we did a hundred hectares of controlled burn. sorry, that's just not good enough.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Seriously? So you get a tinder box all ready waiting for ignition... Dang. Controlled burns coencide with responsible land management. F'n greenies.Cheez wrote:
That's unenvironmental.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Y'all ever do controlled burns?
No really, we used to do that down here but we had to stop when the Greens complained.
I think you are getting the Greens (a political party) and greenies (environmentalists) confused.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Seriously? So you get a tinder box all ready waiting for ignition... Dang. Controlled burns coencide with responsible land management. F'n greenies.Cheez wrote:
That's unenvironmental.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Y'all ever do controlled burns?
No really, we used to do that down here but we had to stop when the Greens complained.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-12-18 01:03:23)
this is true.. one incident a few months back, a backburn got a little out of hand and got a bit too close to homes for comfort.Dilbert_X wrote:
Nothing like enough controlled burns, I guess the CFS prefer fighting fires to doing preventive work.
Also 'controlled burns' still do damage to fences, cables etc.
Last edited by Spark (2009-12-18 05:32:53)