Still waitng for your links to these terror attacks on US cities with mas casualties.Bertster7 wrote:
No, I meant attacks. Attacks in which American civilians have been killed on American soil.Spark wrote:
think you're exaggerating there - or did you mean attempted attacks?Bertster7 wrote:
Actually more Islamic terror attacks against Americans than any other period in history to date.
~ 20 attacks on US soil since 9/11 and more Americans killed by Islamic extremists than ever before.
Of course it's worked out well. That's even before you consider the financial impact.
Hmm which countries exactly? I wasn't walking down streets in Manchester, down las ramblas or along unter den linder seeing pictures of support for Saddam lol. We wern't exactly enthusiastic about going into Iraq, but thats another story.lowing wrote:
A significant amount of countries in Europe was in bed with Saddam. This is why you did not want him attacked.FatherTed wrote:
mmm being seriouslowing wrote:
Gimme a break. Address the post and stop with your bullshit dodging games.
and irony at 'bullshit dodging games' much?
I don't dodge a damn thing, I'll stand toe to toe with the best of ya. Lately, proving to you that Europe loves Obama for no "real" reason, and your challenge that you want a weakened America. and from you? no denial, just questions yo already know the answer to.
You havn't proven anything to me lol, all you've done is a)ignore what i post, and b)make blanket statements, which upon refution you just ignore.
I assume you refer to our 'bed partner' lol. That was a genuine question because what you said is mental. If you want examples of posts i've made where i've addressed your own without making stupid off-tracks, have a look at...every post i've made in this topic to you?lowing wrote:
and from you? no denial, just questions...
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
If I were to say embassies, would you understand....?lowing wrote:
Still waitng for your links to these terror attacks on US cities with mas casualties.Bertster7 wrote:
No, I meant attacks. Attacks in which American civilians have been killed on American soil.Spark wrote:
think you're exaggerating there - or did you mean attempted attacks?
Yup I would, however it is an end run around the context of the observation, and is nothing more than you trying to be technical smart ass. You know what my argument is.Bertster7 wrote:
If I were to say embassies, would you understand....?lowing wrote:
Still waitng for your links to these terror attacks on US cities with mas casualties.Bertster7 wrote:
No, I meant attacks. Attacks in which American civilians have been killed on American soil.
Ummm France, Germany Russia for openers.FatherTed wrote:
Hmm which countries exactly? I wasn't walking down streets in Manchester, down las ramblas or along unter den linder seeing pictures of support for Saddam lol. We wern't exactly enthusiastic about going into Iraq, but thats another story.lowing wrote:
A significant amount of countries in Europe was in bed with Saddam. This is why you did not want him attacked.FatherTed wrote:
mmm being serious
and irony at 'bullshit dodging games' much?
I don't dodge a damn thing, I'll stand toe to toe with the best of ya. Lately, proving to you that Europe loves Obama for no "real" reason, and your challenge that you want a weakened America. and from you? no denial, just questions yo already know the answer to.
You havn't proven anything to me lol, all you've done is a)ignore what i post, and b)make blanket statements, which upon refution you just ignore.I assume you refer to our 'bed partner' lol. That was a genuine question because what you said is mental. If you want examples of posts i've made where i've addressed your own without making stupid off-tracks, have a look at...every post i've made in this topic to you?lowing wrote:
and from you? no denial, just questions...
I also haven't ignored a damn thing you have posted, in fact I have answered every one of them. You also refute nothing, just defend it.
Actually I did review your posts in this thread, and before you proceed with how profound they were, you may want to re-read them for yourself. You really make no points at all, just smart ass comments and defend existing arguments, which I have already attacked.
Why do mods jump all over a thread in EE whenever it goes off topic but when something like this(which is not even considered d&st 'worthy') goes off topic it last for 6 pages?
You mean like your whinning? Or just my posts, as if it is just me.13/f/taiwan wrote:
Why do mods jump all over a thread in EE whenever it goes off topic but when something like this(which is not even considered d&st 'worthy') goes off topic it last for 6 pages?
Actually this is just like real life. A conversation starts on one topic and by the end of the night, it has covered the spectrum. Get over it
he had a valid point, and you abuse him so?lowing wrote:
You mean like your whinning? Or just my posts, as if it is just me.13/f/taiwan wrote:
Why do mods jump all over a thread in EE whenever it goes off topic but when something like this(which is not even considered d&st 'worthy') goes off topic it last for 6 pages?
Actually this is just like real life. A conversation starts on one topic and by the end of the night, it has covered the spectrum. Get over it
abuse? Now that is pretty good. Don't preach to me about abuse in this forum pal. I take more of it, unwarranted and unretalitated than anyone.burnzz wrote:
he had a valid point, and you abuse him so?lowing wrote:
You mean like your whinning? Or just my posts, as if it is just me.13/f/taiwan wrote:
Why do mods jump all over a thread in EE whenever it goes off topic but when something like this(which is not even considered d&st 'worthy') goes off topic it last for 6 pages?
Actually this is just like real life. A conversation starts on one topic and by the end of the night, it has covered the spectrum. Get over it
Most DST threads all derail after the first page.
yes, and i've personally apologized for, well, personalizing posts. He merely made a statement, and you marginalized him for it - a statement not directed towards you.lowing wrote:
abuse? Now that is pretty good. Don't preach to me about abuse in this forum pal. I take more of it, unwarranted and unretalitated than anyone.burnzz wrote:
he had a valid point, and you abuse him so?lowing wrote:
You mean like your whinning? Or just my posts, as if it is just me.
Actually this is just like real life. A conversation starts on one topic and by the end of the night, it has covered the spectrum. Get over it
i understand a "conversation" can go hither and yon. lowing, i saw nothing in his statement directed towards you yet you chose to say 'like your[sic] whining?'. Apparently, you see D&ST as your personal forum. some of us do not.
good day sir.
A post directly after mine, within a minute or so? But I am sure he was not talking to meburnzz wrote:
yes, and i've personally apologized for, well, personalizing posts. He merely made a statement, and you marginalized him for it - a statement not directed towards you.lowing wrote:
abuse? Now that is pretty good. Don't preach to me about abuse in this forum pal. I take more of it, unwarranted and unretalitated than anyone.burnzz wrote:
he had a valid point, and you abuse him so?
i understand a "conversation" can go hither and yon. lowing, i saw nothing in his statement directed towards you yet you chose to say 'like your[sic] whining?'. Apparently, you see D&ST as your personal forum. some of us do not.
good day sir.
i said Good Day Sir!
Already had one. Hope you do the same.burnzz wrote:
i said Good Day Sir!
thank you. the timing of 13/f/taiwans post and yours may be coincidental, i saw him log in.
does not diminish the point posted, this was a train wreck from the first page. i merely mentioned that you had taken him to task for that which you have belittled me in the past.
my question to you, are you man enough to act in the manner that i did when i realized i acted unbecoming of a post in this section?
does not diminish the point posted, this was a train wreck from the first page. i merely mentioned that you had taken him to task for that which you have belittled me in the past.
my question to you, are you man enough to act in the manner that i did when i realized i acted unbecoming of a post in this section?
To be honest this thread really never had a topic.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
i posted like 1 hour after him. and tbh the only post i read were the first 3-4 and the ones on this page.burnzz wrote:
thank you. the timing of 13/f/taiwans post and yours may be coincidental, i saw him log in.
does not diminish the point posted, this was a train wreck from the first page. i merely mentioned that you had taken him to task for that which you have belittled me in the past.
my question to you, are you man enough to act in the manner that i did when i realized i acted unbecoming of a post in this section?
lowing don't take it so personal, bro.
Sure the second I "abuse" someone i will apologize.burnzz wrote:
thank you. the timing of 13/f/taiwans post and yours may be coincidental, i saw him log in.
does not diminish the point posted, this was a train wreck from the first page. i merely mentioned that you had taken him to task for that which you have belittled me in the past.
my question to you, are you man enough to act in the manner that i did when i realized i acted unbecoming of a post in this section?
i guess not. Good Night sir.
Like I said, the second I actually "abuse" someone, ya know, to the point of which I have grown accustomed in this forum, I will apologize.burnzz wrote:
i guess not. Good Night sir.
See ya