Test Your Ping

2009-10-04 12:01:53

#1

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6445|The Twilight Zone

Test your ping chimps: http://www.pingtest.net/

https://www.pingtest.net/result/174888.png

getting better and better...wtf

btw menzo you were saying?...

So according to pingtest I have packet loss.

https://www.pingtest.net/result/160418.png

Never had an issue before but I recently moved from XP to Win7 and replaced the older Netgear router with a newer wireless, also Netgear router (but on wired connection). I believe that's why I get graphic glitches in BF2- some renders simply don't load because they get lost during packet exchange, even if I manage to load it without glitches I get incredible lag and ping goes sky-high. BF2 worked fine with the new router on XP. Are there any services that are communicating with the Internet while I'm playing?

Thanks for any help

Last edited by .Sup (2009-10-04 15:33:23)

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

2009-10-04 12:33:33

#2

menzo: ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#; +616|6438|Amsterdam‫

https://www.pingtest.net/result/164271.png

me>you

Last edited by menzo (2009-10-04 12:44:36)

https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png

2009-10-04 12:35:24

#3

~{TPP}~richoxon: I Want a New Duck; +43|6559|Up a tree

https://www.pingtest.net/result/163637.png

2009-10-04 12:35:54

#4

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6445|The Twilight Zone

menzo wrote:
http://www.pingtest.net/result/163455.png

me>you

you rock

2009-10-04 12:40:14

#5

menzo: ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#; +616|6438|Amsterdam‫

.Sup wrote:
menzo wrote:
http://www.pingtest.net/result/163455.png

me>you
you rock

i know

but srry i don't know how to fix ur problem

2009-10-04 12:41:25

#6

alexb: <3; +590|5932|Kentucky, USA

Run -> cmd -> ipconfig /release -> ipconfig /renew -> Try again?

Only thing I can think of on the top of my head.

2009-10-04 12:44:23

#7

~{TPP}~richoxon: I Want a New Duck; +43|6559|Up a tree

http://www.dslreports.com/linequality

2009-10-04 12:52:24

#8

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6489

so you went from xp -> win7, nothing else changed (you said you tried xp on the new router)

run a traceroute from 7. i can't imagine the stack is all that different, but i haven't seen it yet.

https://www.pingtest.net/result/164656.png

2009-10-04 13:07:59

#9

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6445|The Twilight Zone

connected the old wired router and still get packet loss. Tried pinging on my netbook with XP and got packet loss there too. Ping is extremely high. I usually ping 20-25 to Vienna. Also in my router log it said "DoS attack..." several times.

2009-10-04 13:09:11

#10

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6489

.Sup wrote:
connected the old wired router and still get packet loss. Tried pinging on my netbook with XP and got packet loss there too. Ping is extremely high. I usually ping 20-25 to Vienna. Also in my router log it said "DoS attack..." several times.

yeah, do the traceroute - if you are the one being attacked, you wouldn't be posting.

2009-10-04 13:21:01

#11

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6445|The Twilight Zone

https://www.pingtest.net/result/166767.png

the fuck is going on

this is on XP with the wired router

update:
on Windows 7

https://www.pingtest.net/result/167017.png

Could this be a momenteral provider issue?

Last edited by .Sup (2009-10-04 13:24:54)

2009-10-04 13:22:44

#12

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6489

sounds like it - you posted "DDoS", they fuck with everyone's connections . . .

c:\tracert bf2s.com

Last edited by burnzz (2009-10-04 13:27:33)

2009-10-04 13:28:51

#13

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6445|The Twilight Zone

burnzz wrote:
sounds like it - you posted "DDoS", they fuck with everyone's connections . . .

c:\tracert bf2s.com

https://www.shrani.si/f/31/RB/3epRxWbF/1.png

I have no idea what this means

2009-10-04 13:31:38

#14

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6489

it looks fine to me - it's basically listing the hops a packet takes to a destination.
if a DDoS attack was happening along the way, you'd see it with trace route.

2009-10-04 13:32:52

#15

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6445|The Twilight Zone

This kinda makes me calmer: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index … 320AASua1g

2009-10-04 13:33:13

#16

alexb: <3; +590|5932|Kentucky, USA

I think it should look something like this; all of the pings should be fairly consistent. At least, this is what it looks like to me, when I ping bf2s.com

EDIT - Never mind, I realized .Sup is in a different region of the world, so the pings make sense.

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/32377/tracert.JPG

Last edited by alexb (2009-10-04 13:34:39)

2009-10-04 13:39:51

#17

menzo: ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#; +616|6438|Amsterdam‫

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/23110/trace.jpg

2009-10-04 13:42:31

#18

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6445|The Twilight Zone

Ok thanks for your help guys. I will try connecting the wireless router again tomorrow and see if its really a router issue. But I don't think it is. I got packet loss with the wired router too minutes after I made it connect with the PC but then it suddenly started working normal, even the pings were okay.

2009-10-04 13:42:31

#19

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6489

lol, newthread~ "post your tracert here"

2009-10-04 13:44:28

#20

menzo: ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#; +616|6438|Amsterdam‫

burnzz wrote:
lol, newthread~ "post your tracert here"

i have the shortest now
(in b4 that is what she said etc)

2009-10-04 14:24:58

#21

Metal-Eater-GR: I can haz titanium paancakez?; +490|6264

https://www.pingtest.net/result/171055.png

i fail. My ISP says there is a problem on my end, i say they are full of shit.

2009-10-04 14:26:47

#22

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6489

hey Metal Eater, wanna play some bf2? j/k, looks like you have some troubleshooting to do . . .

2009-10-04 14:29:51

#23

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6406|Finland

O lol this test doesn't even work very well. Stupid russians have shitty conenctions for example. Can easily get 3% package losses in couple servers, and 70ms jitter. Then take quality server and 1ms jitter and no package loss.

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2009-10-04 14:31:27

#24

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6445|The Twilight Zone

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
O lol this test doesn't even work very well. Stupid russians have shitty conenctions for example. Can easily get 3% package losses in couple servers, and 70ms jitter. Then take quality server and 1ms jitter and no package loss.

pick a non Russian server that is close to you to do the test then

2009-10-04 14:32:20

#25

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6406|Finland

.Sup wrote:
GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
O lol this test doesn't even work very well. Stupid russians have shitty conenctions for example. Can easily get 3% package losses in couple servers, and 70ms jitter. Then take quality server and 1ms jitter and no package loss.
pick a non Russian server that is close to you to do the test then

Pinged Norway server and said jitter is 80ms and package loss 3%. Then did the same on same server, 0% package loss and 0ms jitter.

Conclusion: test is epic fail.

Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2009-10-04 14:33:11)

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

BF2S Forums Test Your Ping

menzo wrote:

.Sup wrote:

menzo wrote:

.Sup wrote:

burnzz wrote:

burnzz wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

.Sup wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

Board footer