nickb64
formerly from OC (it's EXACTLY like on tv)[truth]
+77|5900|Greatest Nation on Earth(USA)
So, basically we are trying to radically change the system that covers(with or without insurance) about 288 million Americans, in order to fully cover the other approximately 12 million who are currently deemed "uninsurable".

I do believe that the healthcare system needs reform, but nothing gets less expensive when the government is in charge.

Health care wouldn't cost as much if doctors didn't do pointless test just to cover their asses in case of lawsuits, or if they didn't have to get lots of insurance against malpractice claims.
PureFodder
Member
+225|6574

Kmarion wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Let me be a little clearer. I've personally experienced buying private health care for myself here and I am pleased with the results. The bottom line is your opinion has no value. Your self gratification and the thought that this topic is somehow "sobering" to you is a testament of your arrogance. You have made your opinion of America abundantly clear on this forum, telling us how we should be taxed and how we should model our healthcare system. You have no vote in the matter, and so your opinion has has no real weight.
But as the effects of the US healthcare industry on the US economy will effect the global economy and therefore are likely to impact my life I am a stake holder in the process. The potential collapse of the US medical system is being viewed with plenty of concern by economists around the world as they have had a pertinent demonstration of what happens when the US economy goes off the rails for a bit.

How is any of what I said arrogant? the fact that the US system has a seious potential to impact me is arrogant? The real arrogance is people like you who claim to have in depth knowledge of the system simply by being involved with the end result of it. The idea that having had medical insurance means that you can speak with authority for 300,000,000 people and all their situations and know all the economic and personal effects that changes to the system can have is insane. When I buy a train ticket I don't claim to have any in depth knowledge of the transportation industry. When I buy some imported German sausages I don't claim to have relavant personal experience of the effects of the Euro on the British economy. That would be arrogance.
I did not say that I speak for 300 million people. You made that association because pointing out the absurdity makes you some how feel enlightened.  However my real experience does have value, as opposed to a Google educated perception of what someone feels it is really like over here. I'm not basing this on just my own personal experience neither. I have friends and family that share their real day to day involvement with me. Some of them work in the healthcare industry. This knowledge is combined with the opportunity I share with you, to investigate the situation on a larger scale. Unfortunately this information is too often filled with bias interpretation. The US healthcare system isn't going to collapse. Far from it. However, if you have propped yourself up on an economy that you feel is on the verge of collapse then that is your problem. I'm critical of my own countries debt problem and I'm not looking for another country to blame or excuse it. Sometimes you have to look inwards to progress. It is not our responsibility to cater to you. Every country in the world acts in what believe to be their best interest. We are going to make our choices in domestic healthcare based on what we feel is right for our country. A fact you should think about accepting.
Look at any projections of the future costs of the US health industry. It's currently rising at about double the rate of inflation and wages and significantly faster than US GDP. This is pretty well universally expected to cause a huge increase in the US deficit and cause more extensive harm to US businesses as they are faced with an ever increasing burden to pay their employees healthcare costs. there's either going to be a very significant change or a collapse.

I accept that the US decision is entirely for Americans to decide, but I totally diasagree that people outside the US can't give opinions about it and even have far more informed opinions about it. The chances are that on a wide range of internal UK issues, half an hour with google will make you much more informed than me. You look for people in a position to know far more than the average person, such as experts in the particular field and those who have carried out widespread research on the topic and read/understand what they've said about it. As such it is therefore possible to influence what people in another country feel is their best option. As has been shown repeatededly on this forum alone, people can be completely wrong about issues internal to their country and be corrected on it by foreigners. As one of the main issues regarding the US healthcare debate is how the current system stacks up against the types of system in other countries like the UK, then clearly the opinions of foreigners are equally important when trying to determine which system is best.

There's a further issue that as a Brit and an American the idea that "It is not our responsibility to cater to you." is deeply hypocritical as both our countries have a rich history of invading, overthrowing and meddling in other countries when their internal politics don't cater to us.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6890|132 and Bush

PureFodder wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

But as the effects of the US healthcare industry on the US economy will effect the global economy and therefore are likely to impact my life I am a stake holder in the process. The potential collapse of the US medical system is being viewed with plenty of concern by economists around the world as they have had a pertinent demonstration of what happens when the US economy goes off the rails for a bit.

How is any of what I said arrogant? the fact that the US system has a seious potential to impact me is arrogant? The real arrogance is people like you who claim to have in depth knowledge of the system simply by being involved with the end result of it. The idea that having had medical insurance means that you can speak with authority for 300,000,000 people and all their situations and know all the economic and personal effects that changes to the system can have is insane. When I buy a train ticket I don't claim to have any in depth knowledge of the transportation industry. When I buy some imported German sausages I don't claim to have relavant personal experience of the effects of the Euro on the British economy. That would be arrogance.
I did not say that I speak for 300 million people. You made that association because pointing out the absurdity makes you some how feel enlightened.  However my real experience does have value, as opposed to a Google educated perception of what someone feels it is really like over here. I'm not basing this on just my own personal experience neither. I have friends and family that share their real day to day involvement with me. Some of them work in the healthcare industry. This knowledge is combined with the opportunity I share with you, to investigate the situation on a larger scale. Unfortunately this information is too often filled with bias interpretation. The US healthcare system isn't going to collapse. Far from it. However, if you have propped yourself up on an economy that you feel is on the verge of collapse then that is your problem. I'm critical of my own countries debt problem and I'm not looking for another country to blame or excuse it. Sometimes you have to look inwards to progress. It is not our responsibility to cater to you. Every country in the world acts in what believe to be their best interest. We are going to make our choices in domestic healthcare based on what we feel is right for our country. A fact you should think about accepting.
Look at any projections of the future costs of the US health industry. It's currently rising at about double the rate of inflation and wages and significantly faster than US GDP. This is pretty well universally expected to cause a huge increase in the US deficit and cause more extensive harm to US businesses as they are faced with an ever increasing burden to pay their employees healthcare costs. there's either going to be a very significant change or a collapse.

I accept that the US decision is entirely for Americans to decide, but I totally diasagree that people outside the US can't give opinions about it and even have far more informed opinions about it. The chances are that on a wide range of internal UK issues, half an hour with google will make you much more informed than me. You look for people in a position to know far more than the average person, such as experts in the particular field and those who have carried out widespread research on the topic and read/understand what they've said about it. As such it is therefore possible to influence what people in another country feel is their best option. As has been shown repeatededly on this forum alone, people can be completely wrong about issues internal to their country and be corrected on it by foreigners. As one of the main issues regarding the US healthcare debate is how the current system stacks up against the types of system in other countries like the UK, then clearly the opinions of foreigners are equally important when trying to determine which system is best.

There's a further issue that as a Brit and an American the idea that "It is not our responsibility to cater to you." is deeply hypocritical as both our countries have a rich history of invading, overthrowing and meddling in other countries when their internal politics don't cater to us.
I understand and recognize that there is a problem. I disagree with the way to address it. Reform can come in a variety of ways. I believe that this reform is inevitable, before a complete collapse.

I never said that you could not have an opinion. I stated that the only one that mattered when it comes to actually making a decision about it was the American opinion. I agree that your only chance to have an impact is to try and influence the American voter. This is something I have not seen yet regarding this topic, or nearly every other one for that matter. In general a debate only serves to further solidify an already chosen platform. Of course seeking a broad range of expert opinions is another way to become informed. I do this often, but I don't limit my sources to those who are there to validate my opinion or world view. There is no comparable country that has had success with a single payer system on this scale. Population size is important. A more accurate comparison to the European model would be done on a state level, something I am more open to. The UK experience has no relevance on my opinion. There are too many inherent difference between our population, diversity, geography, and the way we govern ourselves federally.

Your claim of hypocrisy is not valid. It is based on the assumption that I personally support invading a country because of the way it governs itself internally.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6694|North Carolina
If Japan can do it, I don't see why we can't.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6837|San Diego, CA, USA
The government can't even administer the Cash for Clunkers program (have only paid back 2% of dealers), yet we want them do run our healthcare?

The United States Postal Service (USPS), for the last two years is $2 and $7 Billion respectively - its about to go bankrupt...

Canada is having second thoughts about their healthcare system (i.e. 30k surgeries will not be done because of costs).

Face it...single payer, or government run anything other than the military, sucks.  Besides I wonder if States could ignore the healthcare system (based off the 10th Amendment), because that's what Texas may do - just ignore the national healtcare system.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6700|'Murka

PureFodder wrote:

Look at any projections of the future costs of the US health industry. It's currently rising at about double the rate of inflation and wages and significantly faster than US GDP. This is pretty well universally expected to cause a huge increase in the US deficit and cause more extensive harm to US businesses as they are faced with an ever increasing burden to pay their employees healthcare costs. there's either going to be a very significant change or a collapse.
It's only going to cause a huge increase in the deficit if the government has to pay for it...which it doesn't right now...but would if you had your way.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
PureFodder
Member
+225|6574

FEOS wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

Look at any projections of the future costs of the US health industry. It's currently rising at about double the rate of inflation and wages and significantly faster than US GDP. This is pretty well universally expected to cause a huge increase in the US deficit and cause more extensive harm to US businesses as they are faced with an ever increasing burden to pay their employees healthcare costs. there's either going to be a very significant change or a collapse.
It's only going to cause a huge increase in the deficit if the government has to pay for it...which it doesn't right now...but would if you had your way.
Medicare/medicaid is going to do that at the current rate. The problem with the rest of the system is that is will cripple the rest of the economy by making every employer fork out a vast amount of their profit margins on health insurance of their employees. This has obvious impacts in reduced spending in other sectors and will reduce the ability of US companies to compete with foreign goods and services who have much more managable healthcare costs through taxes.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6700|'Murka

PureFodder wrote:

FEOS wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

Look at any projections of the future costs of the US health industry. It's currently rising at about double the rate of inflation and wages and significantly faster than US GDP. This is pretty well universally expected to cause a huge increase in the US deficit and cause more extensive harm to US businesses as they are faced with an ever increasing burden to pay their employees healthcare costs. there's either going to be a very significant change or a collapse.
It's only going to cause a huge increase in the deficit if the government has to pay for it...which it doesn't right now...but would if you had your way.
Medicare/medicaid is going to do that at the current rate. The problem with the rest of the system is that is will cripple the rest of the economy by making every employer fork out a vast amount of their profit margins on health insurance of their employees. This has obvious impacts in reduced spending in other sectors and will reduce the ability of US companies to compete with foreign goods and services who have much more managable healthcare costs through taxes.
That doesn't address the problem of costs. All it does is transfer the costs to the government instead of private industry. Which transfers the cost to taxpayers instead of consumers--which are not necessarily one and the same. Which in turn transfers the costs from business expenses to government deficit additions.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
BVC
Member
+325|6984
Socialised healthcare really sucks.

Being able to go to the hospital when I'm hurt bad, and tp not have the stress of a large bill at the end of it...yes thats a real downer.
Ty
Mass Media Casualty
+2,398|7063|Noizyland

Also if I'm injured so much that I'm not able to work having evil socialised healthcare pay me while I recover really sucks dog's balls. I mean if only I was forced back to work before I was actually recovered I would be so much happier.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
PureFodder
Member
+225|6574

FEOS wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

FEOS wrote:

It's only going to cause a huge increase in the deficit if the government has to pay for it...which it doesn't right now...but would if you had your way.
Medicare/medicaid is going to do that at the current rate. The problem with the rest of the system is that is will cripple the rest of the economy by making every employer fork out a vast amount of their profit margins on health insurance of their employees. This has obvious impacts in reduced spending in other sectors and will reduce the ability of US companies to compete with foreign goods and services who have much more managable healthcare costs through taxes.
That doesn't address the problem of costs. All it does is transfer the costs to the government instead of private industry. Which transfers the cost to taxpayers instead of consumers--which are not necessarily one and the same. Which in turn transfers the costs from business expenses to government deficit additions.
It cuts out, for example, huge amounts of waste by running a single centralised admin as opposed to immense billing departments in every hospital to sort out the myriad of paperwork created by having thousands of different policies and companies that have to be understood and acted upon correctly by the hospital doctors and patients. One of many expenses in a private system that don't occur to any sensible extent in a socialised system.
PureFodder
Member
+225|6574

Kmarion wrote:

I understand and recognize that there is a problem. I disagree with the way to address it. Reform can come in a variety of ways. I believe that this reform is inevitable, before a complete collapse.
The history of westernised countries watching bubbles rise, and rise before being surprised at it's collapse doesn't give me confidence in the ability to reform before it causes huge amounts of damage. I also agree that the proposed reforms won't have much if any effect in controlling the costs of US healthcare,
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6837|San Diego, CA, USA
Here's Socialized medicine for you:

Family told by NHS: Alzheimer's is not a 'health condition'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healt … ition.html
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7005
Why has no one thought of the idea that the Gov should pay for 50% of healthcare costs, and insurance companies pay for 50% =.= Wouldn't that be a great compromise?
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6970|Disaster Free Zone

Cybargs wrote:

Why has no one thought of the idea that the Gov should pay for 50% of healthcare costs, and insurance companies pay for 50% =.= Wouldn't that be a great compromise?
You mean kind of like... this
Families and individuals that pay private health insurance premiums are eligible for the Federal Government 30% Rebate on private health insurance. Anyone who pays hospital and/or general private health fund premiums for a Complying Health Insurance Policy to a registered health fund can get a 30% reduction on the cost of their private health insurance.
But you also need a good government run system to force a competitive market where Private health companies have to lower their prices to a reasonable level.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6837|San Diego, CA, USA

DrunkFace wrote:

But you also need a good government run system to force a competitive market where Private health companies have to lower their prices to a reasonable level.
Tort reform will really help lower costs so doctors don't have to spend so much on malpractice insurance; they have it in Texas and everyone's premiums are lower.

Instead of socialized medicine I would be willing to have Credits for the poor in the form of money towards a Heath Savings Account (HSA), that uses pre-tax dollars.

Allow people to put money in their HSA and use it for approved Health, Dental, and Vision costs.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6789|so randum

Harmor wrote:

Here's Socialized medicine for you:

Family told by NHS: Alzheimer's is not a 'health condition'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healt … ition.html
Read up a bit (might be on the previous page) about what i posted on the NHS.

And then stop posting one in a million storys.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6870|SE London

Kmarion wrote:

Harmor wrote:

Woman gives birth on pavement 'after being refused ambulance'


Think British medicine is still good?
It doesn't matter what I.. an American thinks.
If the British like it good for them.

It also doesn't matter what they (the rest of the world) thinks when it comes to our system. Although they sure do like to chime in.
This is absolutely true. But when the data from recent polls indicates most of Americans are unsatisfied with the overall system in place there, then there is clearly a need for reform of some sort.

Most Americans agree there is a need for reform, according to the data from recent polls.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6694|North Carolina
Eh...  Americans bitch about everything and anything, and then when there is an attempt to fix something, they'll bitch about that too.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6837|San Diego, CA, USA

Turquoise wrote:

Eh...  Americans bitch about everything and anything, and then when there is an attempt to fix something, they'll bitch about that too.
Better than most countries...I mean look at Iran for example...
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6694|North Carolina

Harmor wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Eh...  Americans bitch about everything and anything, and then when there is an attempt to fix something, they'll bitch about that too.
Better than most countries...I mean look at Iran for example...
Well...  Iranians apparently do more than just bitch.  But yeah, I'm not saying we suck as much as a lot of the world does.  We just seem to be falling down the list when it comes to overall quality of life among the First World.  Part of it is our unhealthy lifestyles and cultural dysfunctionality, but the other part is the vast amount of corporate corruption.

Meanwhile, we halfway perceive these problems before us, but we can never agree on how to fix them.  All we usually end up with is a shitty compromise or just the agreement to disagree.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6890|132 and Bush

Whoever says we don't need reform of some sort is either lying or uniformed.

Look at this title ffs. "Healthcare support goes under 50%" .. wtf
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6694|North Carolina

Kmarion wrote:

Whoever say we don't need reform of some sort is either lying or uniformed.

Look at this ttile ffs. "Healthcare support goes under 50%" .. wtf
Heh...  honestly, I didn't really catch that.  That's quite a Freudian slip, isn't it?
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6890|132 and Bush

Xbone Stormsurgezz
[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi
Why walk when you can dance?
+77|6876|sWEEDen
FYI I have the ability to be both uninformed AND lie.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard