Pages: 1 2 3 4

 

2009-07-06 14:15:08
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6945|USA

Ataronchronon wrote:

lowing wrote:

Ataronchronon wrote:


Show me where I ever stated anything to the contrary. Or is it that you just like to argue?
show you where you said anything to the contrary??? Ummm how about your entire post i responded to? If not please explain this


"The young people involved in politics really couldn't give a shit about "exciting speakers", they pride themselves upon being at least somewhat aware of real world issues."
Your response had absolutely nothing to do with what I wrote and you countered a point I never made.

I never said that all young people involved in politics are liberals, nor did I side with a liberal point of view. I made the point that the GOP is foolish for thinking young people care about "exciting speakers."

Nowhere did I side with a liberal point of view.
Sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, you said this "they pride themselves upon being at least somewhat aware of real world issues."

My response is how can they pride themselves on this if they do not live it, reap the rewards from it, or feel the sting of it?
2009-07-06 14:16:50
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7103|Nårvei

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

lowing wrote:


actually, maybe you better look it up. Govts. do not generate INCOME, or produce goods or services. Companies do this. Switzerland seizes this income for redistribution in the form of socialization.

your argument is even more desperate than the other. If you want to name "SOMEONE", that has built wealth through liberalism socialist ideology, if not move along, naming entire countries is pretty ridiculous especially since it is not even true, unless of course you consider seizing wealth from others as earning wealth.
Eh ... maybe you should look it up lowing ... Statoil, the Norwegian government oil company is ... wait for it ... owned by the government and thus generates income to Norway ... we have a oil fund that ... wait for it ... is owned by the government that invests in stocks and generates an income to Norway ... we even own 0,7% of the US debt that generates interest rates every year ... collecting taxes is actually way down on the list of government income in Norway ...

And Norway is a liberalistic style democracy with a touch of capitalism and delicately sprinkled with socialism ...
Statoil is, wait for it, funded by the people of Norway. It is run by, wait for it, money seized by the people. the employees of it are paid by, wait for it, money seized by the people. If it loses money, it is the, wait for it, people of Norway that lose who, other than having its money seized by Norway, has nothing to do with stateoil.

Norway, would have no money if it did not seize it from its people. It would have no oil company if it did not seize its money from its people, therefore, Norway does not generate wealth, it seizes it, and continues to fund its projects by seizing it, an entity that can not lose because it can always tap its citizens is not a company. It is a program


Now, if you care to get back to what I actually said, and show me "SOMEONE" who has built wealth through liberal ideology I am all ears. I guess, in order to counteract your smart ass responses I must add the obvious. I meant built private wealth.
Yeah ... narrow down your choices when you have been painted into a corner

Good going lowing
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
2009-07-06 14:33:42
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6791

Varegg wrote:

GOP candidate: Jeb Bush
Jeb Bush + Liz Cheney = reusable bumper stickers. makes everyone happy.

https://www.tentpeople.com/burnzz/images/banner.jpg
2009-07-06 15:32:54
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6699|North Carolina
Unless the GOP can rein in the Religious Right some, they won't be getting much of the youth.

Meghan McCain basically has the right idea.  Depending on her competition, I'd probably vote for her.
2009-07-06 16:04:50
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6945|USA

Varegg wrote:

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Eh ... maybe you should look it up lowing ... Statoil, the Norwegian government oil company is ... wait for it ... owned by the government and thus generates income to Norway ... we have a oil fund that ... wait for it ... is owned by the government that invests in stocks and generates an income to Norway ... we even own 0,7% of the US debt that generates interest rates every year ... collecting taxes is actually way down on the list of government income in Norway ...

And Norway is a liberalistic style democracy with a touch of capitalism and delicately sprinkled with socialism ...
Statoil is, wait for it, funded by the people of Norway. It is run by, wait for it, money seized by the people. the employees of it are paid by, wait for it, money seized by the people. If it loses money, it is the, wait for it, people of Norway that lose who, other than having its money seized by Norway, has nothing to do with stateoil.

Norway, would have no money if it did not seize it from its people. It would have no oil company if it did not seize its money from its people, therefore, Norway does not generate wealth, it seizes it, and continues to fund its projects by seizing it, an entity that can not lose because it can always tap its citizens is not a company. It is a program


Now, if you care to get back to what I actually said, and show me "SOMEONE" who has built wealth through liberal ideology I am all ears. I guess, in order to counteract your smart ass responses I must add the obvious. I meant built private wealth.
Yeah ... narrow down your choices when you have been painted into a corner

Good going lowing
Actually I said "someone" from the very beginning, it is your desperate attempt to come up with some sort of argument that mentioned entire nations. An argument that failed.

you are the one that left the context of the discussion not me.

Last edited by lowing (2009-07-06 16:05:53)

 

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard