lol, why do you think they have a boner for doing it?
Failusmarine wrote:
ya.... i have given up. i accept it.ATG wrote:
The playing field will be level;
The level of poor immigrant dirt farmers.
100% agreed ATG.ATG wrote:
Look at what ' they ' are doing to the Culligan water softer company.
What the post office has in mind for Fed-Ex with their flat rate shipments...
What the water department has in mind for California farming...
What Government Motors has in mind for dealerships...
What California and 37 other states have in mind for state worker contracts...
What the FCC has in mind for talk radio...
What cap and trade will do to a already floundrying economy...
Oh, those in power know exactly what the are doing.
It is the systematic destruction of the middle class.
This will be noted in history as the culmination of a first step. The shackles are being put in place. The rich will not get richer, they will get super rich, and the middle class will cease to exist as the poor become the super poor.
After this important first step will come a dictator ship that will engulf the entire world.
The first chapters are written.
I wonder how it will end.
It's orchastrated failure to force government dependency and friendly facism.
"We're from the government, and your going to take our help whether you want it or not and sign away your rights by doing so."
15 more years! 15 more years!
I would love for Texas to secede, i'd head straight to my buddies...but honestly, it just doesnt seem feasible. Unless it went something like this...
Dear Obama,
Fuck you, you unconstitutional pussy.
Love, Texas.
P.S. America-we will be back when he's gone. So don't sweat it ya'll!
Dear Obama,
Fuck you, you unconstitutional pussy.
Love, Texas.
P.S. America-we will be back when he's gone. So don't sweat it ya'll!
As a pattern in history, superpowers only last that way for an average of 100 years.ATG wrote:
Don't let them brand you as a conspiracy theorist.
America as we know it will cease to exist if something is not done.
Worst sentence ever: "We're from the government, and we're here to help"
We're fucked. Bigtime.
We're fucked. Bigtime.
It's quite normal to go into detail when you make accusations and want people to listen to you ... has nothing to do with the fact that this time it was about US issues, I was speaking on general terms ...LividBovine wrote:
If you weren't so condecending most of the time, and if you lived here people might actually care about your opinion.Varegg wrote:
If you are going to spark a revolution I'd say the burden of evidence is on your shoulders ... playing the "prove me wrong" card isn't going to get you many followers but rather quite the opposite because you come off as a conspiracy conman the way you address the issues ...ATG wrote:
Blackberry cannot copy links.
Will be back with that later.
That was stream of thought.
I say, prove me wrong on any account.
Just a friendly advice
Don't be so bloody self centered and stop being such victims thinking the whole world and your own government hates you ... if you think that provide some reasonable evidence of it or no one will take you seriously but rather as a bunch of whining kids that just lost their bag of candy ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
provide reasons? are you blind? watch the news. read bf2s DST. rinse and repeat.
oh, i can haz candi?
oh, i can haz candi?
Last edited by usmarine (2009-06-28 05:34:23)
correction. dont just watch the news, but try and find one that doesnt have obamas milk duds in their mouths like some baby birds waiting for food from mommy.
You don't get the point do you?
Has nothing to with me liking or disliking Obama or Bush or whatever ... it's the point that if you make an allegation you also provide a source or background info for you opinion so that the reader can comprehend what your opinion is based on no matter what the initial subject is about ...
Has nothing to with me liking or disliking Obama or Bush or whatever ... it's the point that if you make an allegation you also provide a source or background info for you opinion so that the reader can comprehend what your opinion is based on no matter what the initial subject is about ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
well sorry, some of us know what he is talking about because we pay attention. i wouldnt expect you to know it obviously, you live in euro land. ATG didnt want a bitchy link fest maybe?
It could happen once in awhile that the ones that doesn't know what he's talking about also find the matter interesting and would like to compare how it transfer into another setting like "Euroland" for example ...usmarine wrote:
well sorry, some of us know what he is talking about because we pay attention. i wouldnt expect you to know it obviously, you live in euro land. ATG didnt want a bitchy link fest maybe?
We may actually have the same problem, may have it worse, may have a better solution ... if we can't grasp the reason behind it may be because the info supplied lacks substance ... or are missing entirely ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
well, ATG is a pothead so i dunno.
but, he obviously wanted a US revolution.
but, he obviously wanted a US revolution.
Possibly. They'll become part of Mexico.Harmor wrote:
EDIT: Texas will succeed secede from the Union in 2011
Last edited by Turquoise (2009-06-28 09:01:11)
On the contrary Turq, I believe if that scenario happened, Texas would more likely try to boot all the mexicans out, or shoot them if they refused...and it nots like there would be nobody to do the menial jobs, with the influx of Americans into Texas after such a secession, most should gladly take over those jobs, at least one would hope, I for one wouldn't mind being a trashman or whatever, as long as I got paid and was allowed to stay...its all gravy baby. Gotta love hypotheticals
If Texas secedes, they could probably take over Mexico all by themselves / kill lots of teh Mexicans and send the rest into forced labor.
First off, sorry for the condescending remark, while I feel your posts come with a certain unsavory tone at times, condescending may be a bit harsh.Varegg wrote:
It's quite normal to go into detail when you make accusations and want people to listen to you ... has nothing to do with the fact that this time it was about US issues, I was speaking on general terms ...LividBovine wrote:
If you weren't so condescending most of the time, and if you lived here people might actually care about your opinion.Varegg wrote:
If you are going to spark a revolution I'd say the burden of evidence is on your shoulders ... playing the "prove me wrong" card isn't going to get you many followers but rather quite the opposite because you come off as a conspiracy conman the way you address the issues ...
Just a friendly advice
Don't be so bloody self centered and stop being such victims thinking the whole world and your own government hates you ... if you think that provide some reasonable evidence of it or no one will take you seriously but rather as a bunch of whining kids that just lost their bag of candy ...
OT: We are not victims and I don't think our government hates us. I think they treat us like a bunch of idiots who are unable to take care of ourselves though. The more anybody is taken care of and taught not to think for themselves, the more they become dependent on said caretaking. Our country was founded on the people looking out for themselves and each other, not some central government providing for us. This is still not being a victim of anything except our own complacency. I understand those that want a more socialist government. That is fine, move somewhere else then. The ones I don't understand are those that don't see that they are trading liberty and opportunity for their safety and security. They only see the one side as the other is slowly taken from them without them knowing it.
Will you agree that the policies being implemented by the current administration are socialist in nature?
Would you agree that the overall policies of our government have been moving towards socialist in nature for the last 70 years?
Would you agree that, based on our constitution, the States should have more control over their population than the federal government?
If you agree with these then you may see where I am coming from. If you disagree, you will continue to think that I/we are a bunch of kids that lost their candy and like to whine about it. (Comments like those are the ones that get me riled up BTW)
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
awesomeHarmor wrote:
Actually if the 20 million illegals are made citizens thought Obama's Amnesty bill later this year the Democrats will gain even more power for the next decade.
so we doing this or what?
"...have laid so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of freedom"
"...have laid so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of freedom"
Doing what? We are a bunch of old wannabe revolutionaries just venting our frustrations right?usmarine wrote:
so we doing this or what?
"...have laid so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of freedom"
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
no
Man, even you have lost your sense of humor. You know I am not serious. Get over it. The Marines fried your brain.
Last edited by LividBovine (2009-06-28 18:49:10)
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
relax
Never.
Here is how relaxed I am: I wrote this last night at work in about 2 hours. I am going to keep adding to it for a while to what it turns into though.
Here is how relaxed I am: I wrote this last night at work in about 2 hours. I am going to keep adding to it for a while to what it turns into though.
Maybe I am taking this too serious.LividBovine wrote:
On the Subject of Politics
I once believed that the Republicans were the ones who looked out for the rich and that the Democrats watched out for the poor. I also believed this was a good thing for as long as there remained a general balance between them, neither the poor or the rich would be worse off. My life was simple. I paid little to no taxes and had pretty good standard of living. I went through high school, 8 years of Military, and 4 years in private industry with this simple view. I did not know or care if one was bad or good for our country, I simply viewed them as different from each other and never dug into it to find out what they actually stood for. I slowly felt compelled to vote for Republican candidates simply because that is what my family did. I did know what any of the candidates stood for other than they opposed the Democrats. The Democrats were becoming the bad guys.
I learned that Republicans stood for a more conservative view and the Democrats stood for a liberal one. At the time I thought conservative was a very good thing be and began to support, at least in my mind, the things they stood for. I was very quick to support and defend something that had come from the conservative side. This of course drove me to vilify the liberal point of view. Conservative = good, Liberal = Bad. Simple, right? It was for a little while. I would generally support political candidates and their views simply because they had the word Republican behind their name. I found reasons to knock the Liberal candidates and everything was still simple and easy. As a general rule I felt that any Republican would hold the same ideals as myself and therefore had my best interest at heart. I believed that hard work would open opportunities and that laziness would beget failure. I believed people are basically good and are capable of making good decisions with their lives. Although these things are true, it did not reflect the mentality of the common Republican politician. I was blind to the self preserving nature of the political environment in Washington. I was also blind to the willingness of the common American to trust their freedom to a bunch of career lawyers/politicians.
Eventually I began to see what our country was founded on. It came as quite a shock to realize the state our country was in and how blind I had been for so long. It was not simply the Republicans were good and Democrats bad anymore. I was beginning to realize the whole system was bad. Who was the bad guy now? Everyone in Washington it would seem. What is bad about this government? I am quite certain that we are moving in a very socialist direction. We are trusting the federal government with dictating how we are to live our lives. They should only be protecting our right to live our lives. Our federal government was never meant to be the size it is now. The founding fathers envisioned the federal government being primarily concerned with the defending of our country as a whole. It was not meant to control aspects of daily life. That was to be up to the local government. The states were to be far more powerful in the affect that could have on your daily life. There wasn’t even anything in the constitution about a federal income tax. What opportunity have we foregone for our own selfishness?
How did we get to this point I have asked myself many times now. I have come to the conclusion that mankind simply is greedy and at the same time unwilling and very unlikely to give up anything they perceive as a right. The problem is their greed has driven the system to take away their precious freedom. Why would we have let this happen to ourselves? Greed rules over all. We have extended our debt out into the future so that we can have things now. By doing this we are opening ourselves up to a whole host of new financial predators. As a species we are inclined to believe that those that we have dealings with have ours, and their best interest at heart. We are sadly mistaken. We have placed our trust in a system that is all too eager to take advantage of our foolishness. On several occasions I have had people tell me that they think the banks are corrupt and should be punished for their actions. How is this? How can we hold the banks accountable for our overextending our finances? Do we not know what is right for us? Have we lost all sense of personal responsibility? It appears as though we have. By attempting to reign in the banks we are giving up some of our freedom. The government is all too willing to step in and tell the banks how to run their business. Didn’t we learn anything from CRA and HUD?
So what is different? Are we any different as people? I think in a lot of ways we are. We are very reluctant to take it upon ourselves to sacrifice anything. We are far too comfortable in letting others make decisions for us. We have trusted a ruling class far too long and may not be able to wrestle control back from them.
Our founding fathers warned us on many occasions of what was to come if we acted in certain ways. We are now looking back and seeing just how wise our founding fathers were. But not all are seeing their wisdom. There are many who view them as relics of a bygone era. We feel we have evolved beyond what they knew to be true. We are faced with more complex issues that cannot be dealt with by some 200 year old piece of paper. So, over time we have moved away from the founding principles and developed our own path. We have given away our freedoms to secure our safety and have thus given away both (sound familiar). We do not deserve the freedoms that we do have left. We have disrespected the good faith sacrifice that so many have made for our freedom.
One may ask what is wrong with a socialist state. There are many attributes that are appealing. Socialism is designed to provide for all. It is the great equalizer for the classes. You will be provided for no matter what happens. These are all goals of a socialist state.
So, what is wrong with all those ideals? Socialism promotes the idea of entitlement and kills the drive to excel. Whenever someone realizes they can receive the same compensation for doing less work, they will. If there is no mechanism to reward hard work, there will be very little. What incentive do people have to innovate or achieve? None. They will tow the line as they are told to do and not strive to improve their lot in life because there is no better lot for them to aspire to. In addition to killing all ambition, it also fails at taking care of the people. Because of the stated effects on personal ambition, the system slowly spirals downward till the collective can no longer sustain a decent standard of living for the individual. To make gains as a society, there has to be a driving force. If the driving force is sustainment of the system, then failure will surely come. If the driving force is to improve one’s well being and their station in life, then that society will thrive. T maintain a true republic, we must remain vigilant of the pitfalls born to us. We are naturally inclined to let others do the thinking for us. This can be very dangerous because there are very few who will hold your best interest ahead of their own. There is always a trade off between liberty and safety. The more you expect your government to keep you safe, from both others and yourself, the more freedom you must sacrifice. It truly is a choice, and not all are against giving up their freedom. What they fail to realize is the degradation of the human spirit as the government takes their worries from them. It is also extremely evident how a pattern of behavior is created by a welfare state. Those who become accustomed to the assistance invariably have a hard time giving it up. They are after all working less and getting more. What need is there to change? Not all are as susceptible to this pattern, but most are.
What needs to be fostered is a sense of self reliance. A personal responsibility in our own lives. People/children need to be taught throughout life that they are their own keepers and that no one should be expected to care for them when they are perfectly capable of it on their own.
Last edited by LividBovine (2009-06-28 19:06:58)
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
very nice for sure