Burwhale
Save the BlobFish!
+136|6522|Brisneyland
This is one of the most important elections for a long time.
Ultra conservative , agitator president versus, more progressive challenger that wants a Iran integrated into the world.
Chances are that Mamoud Armadinajad will rig it anyway. He seems to have the support of the country people ( financially poor, low education etc). While Mir Hossein Mousavi is popular with younger voters and city folk.

links

ABC news wrote:

Hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad appears to be facing a serious challenge, with strong support for reformist candidates.

Of the four running in this election, only the President is refusing to open up talks with the United States and he retains huge support among the country's poor voters.

Former prime minister Mir Hossein Mousavi has been attracting many of the country's younger voters.
Iranians have also had a taste of greater freedom in the lead up to the election. People are actually trying to voice their opinion, although in private .
Most people here would never dream of going that far but within the boundaries of their own courage, they are making a statement.

For young women, it might simply be wearing their headscarf back as far as they dare at the mass rallies for the reformist candidates.

Iran has never seen an election like this. Millions of people are desperate for change and to end the cold war with the West and have freedom of expression inside their own country.
If the incumbent wins, then dissent will dissapear, and people will try to return to the way they lived previously, under a conservative, strict regime. If Mahmoud Ahmadinejad loses it will be a great day for Iran, and also the rest of the world.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6900|132 and Bush

..  as my good buddy deke put it.."Crossing fingers over Iranian elections. We dealt w/ our extremist. It'd be a hopeful sign if the Iranian people reciprocated."
Xbone Stormsurgezz
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6452|what

It's good to see. I hope he loses by a land slide tbh.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|6964|NT, like Mick Dundee

Kohmeni backed Dinnerjacket. Chances are he'll either win, or Khamenei will overrule the verdict and put Dinnerjacket back in.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
Burwhale
Save the BlobFish!
+136|6522|Brisneyland

Flecco wrote:

Kohmeni backed Dinnerjacket. Chances are he'll either win, or Khamenei will overrule the verdict and put Dinnerjacket back in.
This is pretty close to it. Having said that, there is a ground swell of people opposed to him in Iran, the good news is that many that are opposed to him are also conservative. Of the 4 presidential candidates Dinnerjacket is the only one that wants Iran to be an isolated state. I doubt he will lose, as he will cheat anyway, but change hardly ever happens overnight, and Iran looks like it wants change.
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|6964|NT, like Mick Dundee

I think the Hijab should be illegal where Persian women are concerned.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6920|London, England

Flecco wrote:

I think the Hijab should be illegal where Persian women are concerned.
yeah
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6590|Éire

Flecco wrote:

Kohmeni backed Dinnerjacket. Chances are he'll either win, or Khamenei will overrule the verdict and put Dinnerjacket back in.
Can he do that? I know the Mullahs are the real guys in charge but do they have the authority to throw out the democratic segment of the Government when they feel like it? ...and more to the point, would the people (in particular the students and younger people) stand for it?
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6855
Go Moussavi. And as to Flecco's theory - Khomeini didn't overrule the moderate Khameini's election, why would he do it here? If he was that unhappy with Moussavi who would have barred him from running at all.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2009-06-12 05:16:13)

Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|6964|NT, like Mick Dundee

I'm not sure if he can. Might be able to lean on those guys he picked that decide who can run for President there. In any case the President of Iran doesn't matter much, as the Ayahtollah picks people for most of the other important  positions.

In any case, he can sack the next President if he doesn't agree with him.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6522|Escea

Achmadinnerjacket gives you the best impression of someone who would do anything to get into power. Especially when he was calling all of his opponents liars and falsifying information. The guy would try to rig it no question.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6405|eXtreme to the maX
Roll back a few years and:
Achmadinnerjacket Bush gives you the best impression of someone who would do anything to get into power. Especially when he was calling all of his opponents liars and falsifying information. The guy would try to rig it no question.
Fuck Israel
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6522|Escea

Dilbert_X wrote:

Roll back a few years and:
Achmadinnerjacket Bush gives you the best impression of someone who would do anything to get into power. Especially when he was calling all of his opponents liars and falsifying information. The guy would try to rig it no question.
Why do you always change one word in someone elses post so that you can try to compare it to another situation? Bush isn't a President anmore, so that is completely irrelevant to what we're talking about here.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6405|eXtreme to the maX
Its not irrelevant, people gripe about Iran being undemocratic, look back a few years and see how the West looks.
Fuck Israel
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6710|'Murka

Dilbert_X wrote:

Its not irrelevant, people gripe about Iran being undemocratic, look back a few years and see how the West looks.
I wasn't aware that there was a Supreme Leader from a single state-sponsored religion who picked the Presidential candidates here.

Maybe I missed something on the news.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7061

FEOS wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Its not irrelevant, people gripe about Iran being undemocratic, look back a few years and see how the West looks.
I wasn't aware that there was a Supreme Leader from a single state-sponsored religion who picked the Presidential candidates here.

Maybe I missed something on the news.
you did miss something.  people are still stuck with "zomg bush" arguments.  its all they got.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6405|eXtreme to the maX

FEOS wrote:

Maybe I missed something on the news.
You weren't paying attention then.

usm wrote:

its all they got.
epic lulz
Fuck Israel
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7061

Dilbert_X wrote:

epic lulz

usmarine wrote:

its all they got.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6710|'Murka

Dilbert_X wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Maybe I missed something on the news.
You weren't paying attention then.
I wasn't paying attention to you making shit up?

You're right about that.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6405|eXtreme to the maX
It was about calling people liars and falsifying information, try to keep up.
Fuck Israel
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6590|Éire

usmarine wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Its not irrelevant, people gripe about Iran being undemocratic, look back a few years and see how the West looks.
I wasn't aware that there was a Supreme Leader from a single state-sponsored religion who picked the Presidential candidates here.

Maybe I missed something on the news.
you did miss something.  people are still stuck with "zomg bush" arguments.  its all they got.
I get the impression you wish more people were griping about Bush on the forum these days... instead they're all swimming in Obama love-juice.

Bush is slowly becoming a footnote in the BF2S archives my good friend, it's more likely to be people like you who bring him up these days... usually out of some sad effort to re-live the "golden age" of Republican leadership that has now passed!

Last edited by Braddock (2009-06-12 07:24:34)

usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7061

Braddock wrote:

usmarine wrote:

FEOS wrote:


I wasn't aware that there was a Supreme Leader from a single state-sponsored religion who picked the Presidential candidates here.

Maybe I missed something on the news.
you did miss something.  people are still stuck with "zomg bush" arguments.  its all they got.
I get the impression you wish more people were griping about Bush on the forum these days... instead they're all swimming in Obama love-juice.

Bush is slowly becoming a footnote in the BF2S archives my good friend, it's more likely to be people like you who bring him up these days... usually out of some sad effort to re-live the "golden age" of Republican leadership that has now passed!
you get that impression?  you sir should become a mind reader.


i am simply saying its all most of these people know.  it was easy pickings.  now they are left out in the cold.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6710|'Murka

Dilbert_X wrote:

It was about calling people liars and falsifying information, try to keep up.
Then why did you reply to my post with that, since my post had nothing whatsoever to do with it?

You still haven't pointed out the Supreme Leader from the state-sponsored religion who picks the candidates in the US.

And which information did Bush falsify during either of his elections?

Oh...none. That's right.

Calling the other side liars is par for the course in any political election in any country.

Last edited by FEOS (2009-06-12 07:31:55)

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7061

FEOS wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

It was about calling people liars and falsifying information, try to keep up.
Then why did you reply to my post with that, since my post had nothing whatsoever to do with it?

You still haven't pointed out the Supreme Leader from the state-sponsored religion who picks the candidates in the US.
YA
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6522|Escea

It seems to be a case of denouncing the whole "we do it, because they do" when they see fit, yet using the same attitude, "they did it, so why can't they?" when it fits.

OT: Achmadinnerjacket needs to be removed if anything in that area is going to improve, the man and his policies are just a drag on everything else.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard