Those pictures look better than real life.
Pages: 1 … 218 219 220 221 222 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread
here is hoping that is not cutscene or single player bullshit
It's a mix of mp and co-op and possibly sp
I thought it was a mix of mp and sp and possibly co-opmtb0minime wrote:
It's a mix of mp and co-op and possibly sp
Filenames?AussieReaper wrote:
I thought it was a mix of mp and sp and possibly co-opmtb0minime wrote:
It's a mix of mp and co-op and possibly sp
bf3_-_co-op_-_exfiltration_-_gamescom_01.jpg
bf3_-_co-op_-_exfiltration_-_gamescom_03.jpg
bf3_-_mp_-_operation_metro-_gamescom_01.jpg
bf3_-_mp_-_operation_metro-_gamescom_02.jpg
bf3_-_mp_-_caspian_border_-_gamescom_02.jpg
bf3_-_mp_-_caspian_border_-_gamescom_07.jpg
bf3_-_thunder_run_-_gamescom_01.jpg
No way that jet one is MP. But if it is,
We're gonna need a bigger boat.
CoD4 was the last one I owned and it was good, but yeah not bothered with them since.AussieReaper wrote:
Cod4 was good.coke wrote:
Here's my article "3 reasons to miss the next Call of Duty (whatever number/name they tack on the end)"
Reason 1,2,3: The 3 previous versions of the game, as they have all been virtually exactly the fucking same...
From then on though, they became worse. Why? Because that was when they became consolised ports and nothing else.
After Cod4 lean was removed ffs.
I'm kinda disappointed that building destruction is only building facade. I like Destruction 2.0. Sometimes, there's just one way to destroy a well-defended MCOM.
While that is very fun, it's also very cheap (especially with more aircraft), so I think it'll be a good omission for gameplay's sake.Ilocano wrote:
I'm kinda disappointed that building destruction is only building facade. I like Destruction 2.0. Sometimes, there's just one way to destroy a well-defended MCOM.
Fun times in BC2 launching tank rounds across the map and winning at Rush, but it was still dumb after the hilarity wore off.
The jet picture is def from the MP video Menzo posted.Ilocano wrote:
Filenames?AussieReaper wrote:
I thought it was a mix of mp and sp and possibly co-opmtb0minime wrote:
It's a mix of mp and co-op and possibly sp
bf3_-_co-op_-_exfiltration_-_gamescom_01.jpg
bf3_-_co-op_-_exfiltration_-_gamescom_03.jpg
bf3_-_mp_-_operation_metro-_gamescom_01.jpg
bf3_-_mp_-_operation_metro-_gamescom_02.jpg
bf3_-_mp_-_caspian_border_-_gamescom_02.jpg
bf3_-_mp_-_caspian_border_-_gamescom_07.jpg
bf3_-_thunder_run_-_gamescom_01.jpg
No way that jet one is MP. But if it is,
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
Why does everyone say that CoD4 was "the last good CoD" when you still had the poorly designed weapons, you still had retarded kills streaks, and CoD4 had by far the most retarded perks in the forms of shit like "40% more damage perk that you will never not use," "40% more health perk to use when you are bored of 40% more damage perk" and everyone's favorite "drop a fucking grenade at half-fuse whenever you die."
Was just as terrible as MW2 and probably more than Black-Cops (which did have lean and didn't have as retarded a perk system), people only say CoD4 didn't suck because it was MW2 that turned them off to the series, and that had more to do with IW's BS than anything about the actual game itself if you can get past the server shit.
Was just as terrible as MW2 and probably more than Black-Cops (which did have lean and didn't have as retarded a perk system), people only say CoD4 didn't suck because it was MW2 that turned them off to the series, and that had more to do with IW's BS than anything about the actual game itself if you can get past the server shit.
This. And I couldn't. Fuck p2p.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
f if you can get past the server shit.
Not even MW3 will have dedicated servers. lol!
Death of cod this year.AussieReaper wrote:
This. And I couldn't. Fuck p2p.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
f if you can get past the server shit.
Not even MW3 will have dedicated servers. lol!
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
MW2 wasn't peer-to-peer though, that term refers to how torrents work, where you download and upload the same item from and to multiple other people simultaneously.AussieReaper wrote:
This. And I couldn't. Fuck p2p.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
f if you can get past the server shit.
Not even MW3 will have dedicated servers. lol!
If you join a 1v1 server, it is.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
MW2 wasn't peer-to-peer though, that term refers to how torrents work, where you download and upload the same item from and to multiple other people simultaneously.AussieReaper wrote:
This. And I couldn't. Fuck p2p.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
f if you can get past the server shit.
Not even MW3 will have dedicated servers. lol!
Wait, what am I saying? Join a server? LOL!
Well no actually, there is still a host who carries out all of the calculations.AussieReaper wrote:
If you join a 1v1 server, it is.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
MW2 wasn't peer-to-peer though, that term refers to how torrents work, where you download and upload the same item from and to multiple other people simultaneously.AussieReaper wrote:
This. And I couldn't. Fuck p2p.
Not even MW3 will have dedicated servers. lol!
Wait, what am I saying? Join a server? LOL!
Oh yeah. Even in 1v1 the host has a huge advantage.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Well no actually, there is still a host who carries out all of the calculations.AussieReaper wrote:
If you join a 1v1 server, it is.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
MW2 wasn't peer-to-peer though, that term refers to how torrents work, where you download and upload the same item from and to multiple other people simultaneously.
Wait, what am I saying? Join a server? LOL!
Wait, and you're argument is that that was a better game than what Cod4 offered?
My argument was that CoD4 was still shit but no one realized how terrible the CoD series has become until MW2 dropped dedicated servers.AussieReaper wrote:
Oh yeah. Even in 1v1 the host has a huge advantage.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Well no actually, there is still a host who carries out all of the calculations.AussieReaper wrote:
If you join a 1v1 server, it is.
Wait, what am I saying? Join a server? LOL!
Wait, and you're argument is that that was a better game than what Cod4 offered?
What was IW's justification for P2P in the first place?
They don't even know.Macbeth wrote:
What was IW's justification for P2P in the first place?
World at War was the last Call of Duty I thought was good. I would like to see BF3 make IW have to change Call of Duty and create a newer engine and some better gameplay after BF3 dominates the gaming this year.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
CoD is fucking horrible because despite all the sales to noobs and 12 year olds, everyone knows they have made nothing but minor adjustments to the basic formula over the past 5 years. No innovation, no nothin
Last edited by Spearhead (2011-08-16 20:57:29)
Call of Duty 4 was something new and fresh. It had cool things like perks, weapon customization, create-a-class, wallbanging, killstreaks, etc. After World at War it got old because it was the same old thing, and nobody (over the mental age of 12) wanted to buy a game that was a recycle of the same thing that came out 2 years earlier and was worse.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
very much so... that's got my attention.M.O.A.B wrote:
Seeing the map from the air, with the carpet bombing going on in the background, reminds me of WIC.mtb0minime wrote:
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Why can't I see those two darn pictures? I've clicked on them and waited forever, my internet is fast so that isn't the problem, I tried opening the links in other windows and tabs, etc.
Darn it!
Darn it!
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Pages: 1 … 218 219 220 221 222 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread