aerodynamic
FOCKING HELL
+241|6014|Roma
I bought these for 49€ and I love them.
http://www.hifiheadphones.co.uk/sennhei … d-206.html

The Audio quality is really good, Great Bass.
And plus I can go anywhere in my house and still listen to what ever i was listening right in front of my pc with the same audio quality.
Even if i close the doors they still work great!
I love them!
https://bf3s.com/sigs/8ea27f2d75b353b0a18b096ed75ec5e142da7cc2.png
liquidat0r
wtf.
+2,223|6888|UK
I've always wanted a pair of wireless headphones.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6414|what

https://cmca.wikispaces.com/file/view/sony_earbuds.jpg


FUCK APPLE AND THEIR SHIT IPOD HEADPHONES
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
FFLink
There is.
+1,380|6952|Devon, England

AussieReaper wrote:

https://cmca.wikispaces.com/file/view/sony_earbuds.jpg


FUCK APPLE AND THEIR SHIT IPOD HEADPHONES
WTF?
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6458|Winland

The site wrote:

Signal-to-noise ratio: 65dB
Enjoy your ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

AussieReaper wrote:

https://cmca.wikispaces.com/file/view/sony_earbuds.jpg


FUCK APPLE AND THEIR SHIT IPOD HEADPHONES
take your meds sweetie
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6414|what

Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

https://cmca.wikispaces.com/file/view/sony_earbuds.jpg


FUCK APPLE AND THEIR SHIT IPOD HEADPHONES
take your meds sweetie
The purple ones help me control my emotions and stay awake at school.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Cheez
Herman is a warmaphrodite
+1,027|6700|King Of The Islands

AussieReaper wrote:

https://cmca.wikispaces.com/file/view/sony_earbuds.jpg


FUCK APPLE AND THEIR SHIT IPOD HEADPHONES
They're earphones m8.
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6414|what

Cheez wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

https://cmca.wikispaces.com/file/view/sony_earbuds.jpg


FUCK APPLE AND THEIR SHIT IPOD HEADPHONES
They're earphones m8.

Freezer7Pro wrote:

ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu-
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6458|Winland

AussieReaper wrote:

Cheez wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

https://cmca.wikispaces.com/file/view/sony_earbuds.jpg


FUCK APPLE AND THEIR SHIT IPOD HEADPHONES
They're earphones m8.

Freezer7Pro wrote:

ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu-
I hate how that's what the letter F means these days.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6882|London, England

Freezer7Pro wrote:

The site wrote:

Signal-to-noise ratio: 65dB
Enjoy your ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff.
If you're talking about what I think you are, then that only matters when nothing is being played but it's still "on". And you're the only person that listens to nothing in such a way, so you're the only one that cares
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6458|Winland

Mekstizzle wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

The site wrote:

Signal-to-noise ratio: 65dB
Enjoy your ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff.
If you're talking about what I think you are, then that only matters when nothing is being played but it's still "on". And you're the only person that listens to nothing in such a way, so you're the only one that cares
There are quiet parts in music, you know. And 65dB SNR is so bad that it can be heard even when music is being played.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Jean_Peste_tu?
Yes I Do
+44|6881|Auteuil, Laval

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:


Enjoy your ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff.
If you're talking about what I think you are, then that only matters when nothing is being played but it's still "on". And you're the only person that listens to nothing in such a way, so you're the only one that cares
There are quiet parts in music, you know. And 65dB SNR is so bad that it can be heard even when music is being played.
If I remember well its called white noise.
what about shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
I would have to look if for good quality the value has to be low or high.  (I'm not sure anymore)
That's one thing you have to look for when buying audio stuff.
Like distortion, dampening (or damping) factor for bass control (Amplifiers related), hum noise, sensitivity and a bunch of other stuff.
So when you think the specs looks ok, go listen.  Music / sounds are like food, nobody likes the same thing.

Most people today don't take the proper steps to buy something.  Its now so easy to press a button and get it delivered to your door.
How do you chose a car?  You go try it.  Another reason why I don't buy from the web. 
It's not in front of me, is it sturdy, is it cheaply made and / or else I may return the product after?
If I get better pricing from the web then I go in a store, look for the product and then buy it from the web if I still like it.

Sennheiser headphones are on the market since I don't remember.  Although the signal-to-noise ratio is poor (From Freezer comment) the musicality should be okay.  Like most other things, you get what you pay for, usually.
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6458|Winland

Jean_Peste_tu? wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:


If you're talking about what I think you are, then that only matters when nothing is being played but it's still "on". And you're the only person that listens to nothing in such a way, so you're the only one that cares
There are quiet parts in music, you know. And 65dB SNR is so bad that it can be heard even when music is being played.
If I remember well its called white noise.
what about shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
I would have to look if for good quality the value has to be low or high.  (I'm not sure anymore)
That's one thing you have to look for when buying audio stuff.
Like distortion, dampening (or damping) factor for bass control (Amplifiers related), hum noise, sensitivity and a bunch of other stuff.
So when you think the specs looks ok, go listen.  Music / sounds are like food, nobody likes the same thing.

Most people today don't take the proper steps to buy something.  Its now so easy to press a button and get it delivered to your door.
How do you chose a car?  You go try it.  Another reason why I don't buy from the web. 
It's not in front of me, is it sturdy, is it cheaply made and / or else I may return the product after?
If I get better pricing from the web then I go in a store, look for the product and then buy it from the web if I still like it.

Sennheiser headphones are on the market since I don't remember.  Although the signal-to-noise ratio is poor (From Freezer comment) the musicality should be okay.  Like most other things, you get what you pay for, usually.
SNR noise can be anything, doesn't have to be white noise. Usually it's an fffffff noise like a bad ratio station.

And even if they sound ok-ish otherwise, you'd think Sennheiser would know how to perform a little better than that. I find my 96dB PMP hissy sometimes.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6714|The Twilight Zone

aerodynamic wrote:

I bought these for 49€ and I love them.
http://www.hifiheadphones.co.uk/sennhei … d-206.html

The Audio quality is really good, Great Bass.
And plus I can go anywhere in my house and still listen to what ever i was listening right in front of my pc with the same audio quality.
Even if i close the doors they still work great!
I love them!
I sold this to my buddy 2 weeks ago. Make sure you take batteries out after a long period of unusage. Better sound than my old Numark DJ phones and they were wired.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
_Dominiko_PL
TITS or gtfo.
+97|6782|Polish state of EU

aerodynamic wrote:

I bought these for 49€ and I love them.
http://www.hifiheadphones.co.uk/sennhei … d-206.html

The Audio quality is really good, Great Bass.
And plus I can go anywhere in my house and still listen to what ever i was listening right in front of my pc with the same audio quality.
Even if i close the doors they still work great!
I love them!
And what's the point? That you can afford buying retarded headphones for 49€? I can't. You are so awesome. Now please let this another fail show off thread die.
Jenspm
penis
+1,716|6993|St. Andrews / Oslo

_Dominiko_PL wrote:

aerodynamic wrote:

I bought these for 49€ and I love them.
http://www.hifiheadphones.co.uk/sennhei … d-206.html

The Audio quality is really good, Great Bass.
And plus I can go anywhere in my house and still listen to what ever i was listening right in front of my pc with the same audio quality.
Even if i close the doors they still work great!
I love them!
And what's the point? That you can afford buying retarded headphones for 49€? I can't. You are so awesome. Now please let this another fail show off thread die.
lol, way to be a jealous prick.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6458|Winland

Jenspm wrote:

_Dominiko_PL wrote:

aerodynamic wrote:

I bought these for 49€ and I love them.
http://www.hifiheadphones.co.uk/sennhei … d-206.html

The Audio quality is really good, Great Bass.
And plus I can go anywhere in my house and still listen to what ever i was listening right in front of my pc with the same audio quality.
Even if i close the doors they still work great!
I love them!
And what's the point? That you can afford buying retarded headphones for 49€? I can't. You are so awesome. Now please let this another fail show off thread die.
lol, way to be a jealous prick.
Well, there kind of is a stickied thread for this.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6714|The Twilight Zone

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Jenspm wrote:

_Dominiko_PL wrote:

And what's the point? That you can afford buying retarded headphones for 49€? I can't. You are so awesome. Now please let this another fail show off thread die.
lol, way to be a jealous prick.
Well, there kind of is a stickied thread for this.
Its a discussion and discussions should be avoided in the thread you posted
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6458|Winland

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Jenspm wrote:


lol, way to be a jealous prick.
Well, there kind of is a stickied thread for this.
Its a discussion and discussions should be avoided in the thread you posted
That thread was created to stop the "Look at what I just bought!" threads, just like this one.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6714|The Twilight Zone

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Its a discussion and discussions should be avoided in the thread you posted
That thread was created to stop the "Look at what I just bought!" threads, just like this one.
Its a discussion nub
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6458|Winland

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:


Its a discussion and discussions should be avoided in the thread you posted
That thread was created to stop the "Look at what I just bought!" threads, just like this one.
Its a discussion nub
Discussion about what? Wireless headphones in general? The pros and cons of the ones he just got?

No. It's a blatant "look at what I just bought" thread. The OP didn't even do anything but state that he bought something. Something I would say fits quite nicely into the topic named "What tech did you buy today?".
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6714|The Twilight Zone

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:


That thread was created to stop the "Look at what I just bought!" threads, just like this one.
Its a discussion nub
Discussion about what? Wireless headphones in general? The pros and cons of the ones he just got?

No. It's a blatant "look at what I just bought" thread. The OP didn't even do anything but state that he bought something. Something I would say fits quite nicely into the topic named "What tech did you buy today?".
Heil Hitler!
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6458|Winland

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Its a discussion nub
Discussion about what? Wireless headphones in general? The pros and cons of the ones he just got?

No. It's a blatant "look at what I just bought" thread. The OP didn't even do anything but state that he bought something. Something I would say fits quite nicely into the topic named "What tech did you buy today?".
Heil Hitler!
Because that totally proves me wrong.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6714|The Twilight Zone

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:


Discussion about what? Wireless headphones in general? The pros and cons of the ones he just got?

No. It's a blatant "look at what I just bought" thread. The OP didn't even do anything but state that he bought something. Something I would say fits quite nicely into the topic named "What tech did you buy today?".
Heil Hitler!
Because that totally proves me wrong.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=125095

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=96498

...
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard