How can that tiny ass cable work out better than xonar ? oO
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
jesusBertster7 wrote:
I do..Sup wrote:
DVD Audio and SACD only. Who has them here? Anybody?Bertster7 wrote:
What utter nonsense.
No one cares about THX, but Dolby and DTS are very worthwhile for lots of people who are into audio. Unless you're talking about the big pile of shite that is prologic....
Converted all my DTS-Audio CDs to play back on PC too. Wrote a big old batch script to change the sample rate so they sound right. Took ages, but was worth it. Split to 6 mono tracks, resample each track at the right rate, recombine the tracks and you end up with nice .dts files that actually work.
That is a sound card in my book. It is powered by the computer, and it requires its own drivers on the computer..Sup wrote:
http://www.headphonia.com/USB-DAC-Cable … d69d874dadFreezer7Pro wrote:
Right. Show me an external DAC for under $90 with over 100dB SNR and under 0.005% distortion. I dare you..Sup wrote:
Who would be so stupid to "buy a similarly performing external DAC for three or four times the price"? This doesn't make any sense. Do you have a DAC? I compared soundcards to DACs that cost less and over perform soundcards. Why? Because they are concentrated on best 2.0 stereo sound while with soundcards you pay 50% of its cost for Dolby and THX license which no one who's really into audio needs/wants. Soundcards are overpriced not DACs.
60$
laugh some more dick
Your book of rules that Moses wrote himself? Get the fuck out. Its a DAC . And why would anyone want ADC for music listening? Are you trolling?Freezer7Pro wrote:
That is a sound card in my book. It is powered by the computer, and it requires its own drivers on the computer..Sup wrote:
http://www.headphonia.com/USB-DAC-Cable … d69d874dadFreezer7Pro wrote:
Right. Show me an external DAC for under $90 with over 100dB SNR and under 0.005% distortion. I dare you.
60$
laugh some more dick
Even so, it only performs almost as good as a Xonar DX, and doesn't come with either a trace of an ADC, or more than two channels. Not bad for $60, if all you want is decent two-channel audio out, but in my opinion, the high-end ADC, better performance and added flexibility of the Xonar is worth $20.
It is a DAC. But the opinion that it's just a striped down external sound card is just as valid..Sup wrote:
Your book of rules that Moses wrote himself? Get the fuck out. Its a DAC . And why would anyone want ADC for music listening? Are you trolling?Freezer7Pro wrote:
That is a sound card in my book. It is powered by the computer, and it requires its own drivers on the computer.
Even so, it only performs almost as good as a Xonar DX, and doesn't come with either a trace of an ADC, or more than two channels. Not bad for $60, if all you want is decent two-channel audio out, but in my opinion, the high-end ADC, better performance and added flexibility of the Xonar is worth $20.
The Xonar is also a DAC by that definition. The only difference is that that thing is connected to another bus, about 20cm away. You also don't get a dedicated power supply, one of the more valid (and also more costly) features of an external DAC..Sup wrote:
Your book of rules that Moses wrote himself? Get the fuck out. Its a DAC . And why would anyone want ADC for music listening? Are you trolling?Freezer7Pro wrote:
That is a sound card in my book. It is powered by the computer, and it requires its own drivers on the computer..Sup wrote:
http://www.headphonia.com/USB-DAC-Cable/USB-DAC-Cable-with-35mm-Mini-Plug-75cm-30::10134.html?XTCsid=043ad788ff15ea26e1800bd69d874dad
60$
laugh some more dick
Even so, it only performs almost as good as a Xonar DX, and doesn't come with either a trace of an ADC, or more than two channels. Not bad for $60, if all you want is decent two-channel audio out, but in my opinion, the high-end ADC, better performance and added flexibility of the Xonar is worth $20.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2010-02-10 14:37:09)
O fcourse everything that plays audio has a DAC but that doesn't mean that cable is a soundcard.Freezer7Pro wrote:
The Xonar is also a DAC by that definition. The only difference is that that thing is connected to another bus, about 20cm away. You also don't get a dedicated power supply, one of the more valid (and also more costly) features of an external DAC..Sup wrote:
Your book of rules that Moses wrote himself? Get the fuck out. Its a DAC . And why would anyone want ADC for music listening? Are you trolling?Freezer7Pro wrote:
That is a sound card in my book. It is powered by the computer, and it requires its own drivers on the computer.
Even so, it only performs almost as good as a Xonar DX, and doesn't come with either a trace of an ADC, or more than two channels. Not bad for $60, if all you want is decent two-channel audio out, but in my opinion, the high-end ADC, better performance and added flexibility of the Xonar is worth $20.
I didn't say it's bad for music listening, it also is beyond the point of diminishing returns when it comes to sound quality, as long as your amplifier has high-enough input impedance to compensate for the minimal bypass capacitors. However, it does not perform as good as the DX, and you're sacrificing a lot of features for small savings. I don't know about you, but I'm a gamer, and I use a microphone with my PC on a daily basis.
Oh golly, here we go again!.Sup wrote:
O fcourse everything that plays audio has a DAC but that doesn't mean that cable is a soundcard.Freezer7Pro wrote:
The Xonar is also a DAC by that definition. The only difference is that that thing is connected to another bus, about 20cm away. You also don't get a dedicated power supply, one of the more valid (and also more costly) features of an external DAC..Sup wrote:
Your book of rules that Moses wrote himself? Get the fuck out. Its a DAC . And why would anyone want ADC for music listening? Are you trolling?
I didn't say it's bad for music listening, it also is beyond the point of diminishing returns when it comes to sound quality, as long as your amplifier has high-enough input impedance to compensate for the minimal bypass capacitors. However, it does not perform as good as the DX, and you're sacrificing a lot of features for small savings. I don't know about you, but I'm a gamer, and I use a microphone with my PC on a daily basis.
And how would you know DX compares better to the usb DAC cable? And don't tell me specs cause they don't mean half of it
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2010-02-10 15:09:37)