Nukes = peace

2009-04-05 15:44:03

#26

Warhammer: Member; +18|5983

It would be nice to get rid of nuclear bombs. Considering in other fields of military the United States would have the upper hand right now. Though how would you know for sure if a nation completely got rid of them? Look at Iraq we had to practically force our way through to know for sure if they had them or not. Also the scientific knowledge is still out there in developing a nuclear bomb. I think it would be best to know how to counter a nuclear bomb for any real safe measures.

Also I hope we get to recycle the nuclear material for scientific purpose.

2009-04-05 15:45:39

#27

Commie Killer: Member; +192|6689

Then again just eliminating ballistic missiles wouldnt be a bad start, you'd still have free fall bombs and cruise missiles, but those are easier defended against. Anyone know if this push it meant to keep them out of the hands of terrorists or keep them away from nation states?

2009-04-05 15:47:46

#28

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6840|Long Island, New York

I don't hope we get rid of ALL of them, just highly decrease our stockpile.

Don't we have enough right now, even after all the disarmament, to nuke the world ____ times over? (someone fill that in who knows)

2009-04-05 16:01:18

#29

LiamPK: Member; +2|6105|Middlesbrough

If there is peace why do you need nuclear weapons?

2009-04-05 16:07:23

#30

Warhammer: Member; +18|5983

LiamPK wrote:
If there is peace why do you need nuclear weapons?

Keeps enemies who also have nukes in check. There.

2009-04-05 16:07:48

#31

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6713|'Murka

LiamPK wrote:
If there is peace why do you need nuclear weapons?

Because peace is inevitably a temporary state. Just like war is inevitably a temporary state.

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

2009-04-05 16:08:32

#32

Flecco: iPod is broken.; +1,048|6967|NT, like Mick Dundee

LiamPK wrote:
If there is peace why do you need nuclear weapons?

Peace through superior firepower.

Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.

2009-04-05 16:11:16

#33

Warhammer: Member; +18|5983

Poseidon wrote:
I don't hope we get rid of ALL of them, just highly decrease our stockpile.

Don't we have enough right now, even after all the disarmament, to nuke the world ____ times over? (someone fill that in who knows)

Possible Alien threat, maybe we are keeping them when we go offworld in the future?

If we don't get rid of all nukes why massively decrease? Probably cost more anyway to get rid of some that won't make a difference.

Probably could nuke world over 20 times is your answer.

Last edited by Warhammer (2009-04-05 16:14:10)

2009-04-05 16:11:19

#34

LiamPK: Member; +2|6105|Middlesbrough

So enforced peace. Don't go to war or I will nuke you.

2009-04-05 16:15:18

#35

Warhammer: Member; +18|5983

LiamPK wrote:
So enforced peace. Don't go to war or I will nuke you.

We do, but other countries have them as well like Russia and Pakistan.

2009-04-05 16:25:10

#36

Diesel_dyk: Object in mirror will feel larger than it appears; +178|6296|Truthistan

The US needs to be disarmed because when the economy collapses and were all in ruin, the world's richest will be worried that we the people will start firing nukes at their private islands and mansions.

I can see the day coming when financial aid to the US will come with the strings of nuclear disarmorment... Putin must be having a wet dream.

2009-04-05 16:36:52

#37

BVC: Member; +325|6998

Increase the warhead stock TBH

2009-04-05 17:02:25

#38

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|6903|132 and Bush

Diesel_dyk wrote:
I can see the day coming when financial aid to the US will come with the strings of nuclear disarmorment... Putin must be having a wet dream.

dream on

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2009-04-05 17:33:33

#39

Catbox: forgiveness; +505|7018

Kmarion wrote:
Diesel_dyk wrote:
I can see the day coming when financial aid to the US will come with the strings of nuclear disarmorment... Putin must be having a wet dream.
dream on

yeah... that's a ridiculous statement... don't count the US out yet... we have been through worse...
and Nukes keep people honest...

Love is the answer

2009-04-05 19:17:25

#40

destruktion_6143: Was ist Loos?; +154|6929|Canada

wtf is the point of having thousands of nukes in the first place?

2009-04-05 19:33:10

#41

Flecco: iPod is broken.; +1,048|6967|NT, like Mick Dundee

destruktion_6143 wrote:
wtf is the point of having thousands of nukes in the first place?

It's like a measure of a nuclear country's 'epenis'.

The more you have, the bigger your penis!

https://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w131/Flecco/awsm-2.png

Nah seriously though, it's because they get better at designing them occasionally so they go through another round of building better nukes but they rarely, if ever, discard the old ones.

Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.

2009-04-05 20:37:44

#42

destruktion_6143: Was ist Loos?; +154|6929|Canada

Flecco wrote:
destruktion_6143 wrote:
wtf is the point of having thousands of nukes in the first place?
It's like a measure of a nuclear country's 'epenis'.

The more you have, the bigger your penis! http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w131 … awsm-2.png

Nah seriously though, it's because they get better at designing them occasionally so they go through another round of building better nukes but they rarely, if ever, discard the old ones.

lazy cunts tbh

2009-04-05 20:40:23

#43

Diesel_dyk: Object in mirror will feel larger than it appears; +178|6296|Truthistan

[TUF]Catbox wrote:
Kmarion wrote:
Diesel_dyk wrote:
I can see the day coming when financial aid to the US will come with the strings of nuclear disarmament... Putin must be having a wet dream.
dream on
yeah... that's a ridiculous statement... don't count the US out yet... we have been through worse...
and Nukes keep people honest...

uhhh yah.... being ridiculous was the point. Unless the US has an utter economic/currency collapse like the USSR did after their 10 years in Afghanistan then the world financial help package might have huge strings attached. Time will tell, but for right now I was trying for ridiculous because its ridiculous to think that the US could be forced to accept a world currency and nuclear disarmament, right?!

BTW don't mistake my comment for something that I want to see happen, I think both things would be a disaster, I'm just throwing the hypo out there.

2009-04-05 21:47:38

#44

DrunkFace: Germans did 911; +427|6983|Disaster Free Zone

If they keep the peace, why are you so worried about N Korea, Iraq, Iran etc etc having them?

Surely the more countries with them will keep the world a much more peaceful place. In fact because the US has so many why don't they just give like 10 to every country and then we'll never have any wars again.

2009-04-05 22:07:58

#45

Reciprocity: Member; +721|6883|the dank(super) side of Oregon

nickb64 wrote:
I say we show them we are not afraid to nuke something:

http://thoseshirts.com/images/moon400.jpg

we already tried that with jupiter. didn't take.

2009-04-05 22:09:54

#46

nickb64: formerly from OC (it's EXACTLY like on tv)[truth]; +77|5913|Greatest Nation on Earth(USA)

Reciprocity wrote:
nickb64 wrote:
I say we show them we are not afraid to nuke something:

http://thoseshirts.com/images/moon400.jpg
we already tried that with jupiter. didn't take.

I'd like to see it happen, that would be EPIC.

2009-04-05 22:13:56

#47

Reciprocity: Member; +721|6883|the dank(super) side of Oregon

nickb64 wrote:
I'd like to see it happen, that would be EPIC.

look it up. the airforce dropped bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki. nasa dropped a nuclear payload into jupiter.

2009-04-05 22:14:12

#48

Roger Lesboules: Ah ben tabarnak!; +316|6879|Abitibi-Temiscamingue. Québec!

nickb64 wrote:
I say we show them we are not afraid to nuke something:

http://thoseshirts.com/images/moon400.jpg

Anyway, who would miss the moon!!!

2009-04-05 22:15:55

#49

Reciprocity: Member; +721|6883|the dank(super) side of Oregon

Roger Lesboules wrote:
nickb64 wrote:
I say we show them we are not afraid to nuke something:

http://thoseshirts.com/images/moon400.jpg
Anyway, who would miss the moon!!!

tides is ghey

2009-04-05 23:21:26

#50

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6977|Canberra, AUS

Less nukes, but bigger ones. Kill off this ludicrous idea of 'tactical' nuclear weapons, and recognise their one and only purpose - for wiping a country (or, at least, a big part of the country) off the map. Permanently.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

BF2S Forums Nukes = peace

LiamPK wrote:

LiamPK wrote:

LiamPK wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

LiamPK wrote:

Diesel_dyk wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Diesel_dyk wrote:

destruktion_6143 wrote:

Flecco wrote:

destruktion_6143 wrote:

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Diesel_dyk wrote:

nickb64 wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

nickb64 wrote:

nickb64 wrote:

nickb64 wrote:

Roger Lesboules wrote:

nickb64 wrote:

Board footer