The Movie critics, and thus far the consensus among them is to read the book and not watch the movie.Macbeth wrote:
But lowing, who watches the watchmen?lowing wrote:
I am not the champion of anything, I merely feel that if a citizen thinks they have the "right" or the "freedom" to assault police officers. They have another "think" coming.ATG wrote:
You say gangster, I say patriot.
I say the Second Amendment is to protect the citizenry from this kind of tyranny.
Lowing says this kind of tyranny is good. And he claims to be the forums champion of freedom and liberty, lol.
Say say " gasp, I can't believe he said that ".
I say tough times call for straight talk.
I don't like where our country is going and refer you to the reasons our founding fathers cited for revolution against King George.
Think about it; if Lowing kicked a girl, dragged her by her hair, punched her in the head, do you think he would be charged with 4th degree assault?
Selective application of law is anarchy.
So embrace the anarchy. They brought it on.
You fail to acknowledge what I acknowledge, that cops are made up of PEOPLE we charge with our safety. In this task they are face with the worst society has to offer everyday. For their efforts, we thank them by armchair quarter-backing, FRAME BY FRAME mind you, every incident that is recorded in a desporate effort to find a law suit.
What I am saying is, if this guy got outa hand, I understand and appreciate what might have drove him to it, and I sympathize with that reality more than I do the criminal he is trying to deal with.
Apparently amature cameramen that film half events and edit them until they have a money maker.Macbeth wrote:
But lowing, who watches the watchmen?lowing wrote:
I am not the champion of anything, I merely feel that if a citizen thinks they have the "right" or the "freedom" to assault police officers. They have another "think" coming.ATG wrote:
You say gangster, I say patriot.
I say the Second Amendment is to protect the citizenry from this kind of tyranny.
Lowing says this kind of tyranny is good. And he claims to be the forums champion of freedom and liberty, lol.
Say say " gasp, I can't believe he said that ".
I say tough times call for straight talk.
I don't like where our country is going and refer you to the reasons our founding fathers cited for revolution against King George.
Think about it; if Lowing kicked a girl, dragged her by her hair, punched her in the head, do you think he would be charged with 4th degree assault?
Selective application of law is anarchy.
So embrace the anarchy. They brought it on.
You fail to acknowledge what I acknowledge, that cops are made up of PEOPLE we charge with our safety. In this task they are face with the worst society has to offer everyday. For their efforts, we thank them by armchair quarter-backing, FRAME BY FRAME mind you, every incident that is recorded in a desporate effort to find a law suit.
What I am saying is, if this guy got outa hand, I understand and appreciate what might have drove him to it, and I sympathize with that reality more than I do the criminal he is trying to deal with.
Pff movie critics, you find 10 that say it sucks and I'll find 10 that say it doesn't.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
The Movie critics, and thus far the consensus among them is to read the book and not watch the movie.Macbeth wrote:
But lowing, who watches the watchmen?lowing wrote:
I am not the champion of anything, I merely feel that if a citizen thinks they have the "right" or the "freedom" to assault police officers. They have another "think" coming.
You fail to acknowledge what I acknowledge, that cops are made up of PEOPLE we charge with our safety. In this task they are face with the worst society has to offer everyday. For their efforts, we thank them by armchair quarter-backing, FRAME BY FRAME mind you, every incident that is recorded in a desporate effort to find a law suit.
What I am saying is, if this guy got outa hand, I understand and appreciate what might have drove him to it, and I sympathize with that reality more than I do the criminal he is trying to deal with.
Yes amatuer cameramen in police station holding cells operating security cameras required by law because of multiple instances of police brutality in aforementioned cells. Good one lowing. Apparently you didn't even read the story.lowing wrote:
Apparently amature cameramen that film half events and edit them until they have a money maker.Macbeth wrote:
But lowing, who watches the watchmen?
Apparently you didn't read my over all attitude towrd criminals and the police.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Yes amatuer cameramen in police station holding cells operating security cameras required by law because of multiple instances of police brutality in aforementioned cells. Good one lowing. Apparently you didn't even read the story.lowing wrote:
Apparently amature cameramen that film half events and edit them until they have a money maker.Macbeth wrote:
But lowing, who watches the watchmen?
I did read the story, my post was a generality in reference to most incidents of recorded police brutality.
They'll be investigations afterward though. If something wrong was done then somebody will be punished, if not they'll be cleared.lowing wrote:
Apparently you didn't read my over all attitude towrd criminals and the police.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Yes amatuer cameramen in police station holding cells operating security cameras required by law because of multiple instances of police brutality in aforementioned cells. Good one lowing. Apparently you didn't even read the story.lowing wrote:
Apparently amature cameramen that film half events and edit them until they have a money maker.
I did read the story, my post was a generality in reference to most incidents of recorded police brutality.
That's not like you!?lowing wrote:
my post was a generalityKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Yes amatuer cameramen in police station holding cells operating security cameras required by law because of multiple instances of police brutality in aforementioned cells. Good one lowing. Apparently you didn't even read the story.lowing wrote:
Apparently amature cameramen that film half events and edit them until they have a money maker.
ok ive had enough lowing, she kicked off her shoes. that is not assault of any kind. ive kicked my shoes off thousands of time, and never have i killed/maimed/hurt anyone. fancy that... SHE is being charged with a greater degree of assault than the officer. thats insane. if someone kicked their shoes off in your direction would you charge them with assault? no, bc its a fucking shoe! not a bomb, not bullets from a gun, not a knife! a fucking shoe!lowing wrote:
I am not the champion of anything, I merely feel that if a citizen thinks they have the "right" or the "freedom" to assault police officers. They have another "think" coming.ATG wrote:
You say gangster, I say patriot.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
So you own guns so you can shoot cops?
that is some hard-core gangster shit right there yo.
I say the Second Amendment is to protect the citizenry from this kind of tyranny.
Lowing says this kind of tyranny is good. And he claims to be the forums champion of freedom and liberty, lol.
Say say " gasp, I can't believe he said that ".
I say tough times call for straight talk.
I don't like where our country is going and refer you to the reasons our founding fathers cited for revolution against King George.
Think about it; if Lowing kicked a girl, dragged her by her hair, punched her in the head, do you think he would be charged with 4th degree assault?
Selective application of law is anarchy.
So embrace the anarchy. They brought it on.
You fail to acknowledge what I acknowledge, that cops are made up of PEOPLE we charge with our safety. In this task they are face with the worst society has to offer everyday. For their efforts, we thank them by armchair quarter-backing, FRAME BY FRAME mind you, every incident that is recorded in a desporate effort to find a law suit.
What I am saying is, if this guy got outa hand, I understand and appreciate what might have drove him to it, and I sympathize with that reality more than I do the criminal he is trying to deal with.
so what if she was mouthing off or whatever, there is NO excuse for slamming a girls head into the wall, punching her in the face while shes on her stomach, and lifting her up by her hair. that is despicable and cowardly.
You hang on your 20/20 hindsight, fraqme by frame played and rewoundm and played again viewpoint of things like this. I appreciate the heat of the moment, the interaction between cop and criminal, unre-hersed, not subjected to do overs, couldas,shouldas, or wouldas.Macbeth wrote:
They'll be investigations afterward though. If something wrong was done then somebody will be punished, if not they'll be cleared.lowing wrote:
Apparently you didn't read my over all attitude towrd criminals and the police.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Yes amatuer cameramen in police station holding cells operating security cameras required by law because of multiple instances of police brutality in aforementioned cells. Good one lowing. Apparently you didn't even read the story.
I did read the story, my post was a generality in reference to most incidents of recorded police brutality.
In scenarios between cop and criminal you will find me on the side of the cops as my first knee jerk reaction. Unlike ATG, who apparently arms himself to shoot cops.
I can appreciate that, I however, am considering the fact that this girl is obviously a bitch. I was not in the cop car during the initial arrest, the ride to the station, or the booking before this film rolled. I am sorry, my first reaction is, fuck this kid and her attitude.destruktion_6143 wrote:
ok ive had enough lowing, she kicked off her shoes. that is not assault of any kind. ive kicked my shoes off thousands of time, and never have i killed/maimed/hurt anyone. fancy that... SHE is being charged with a greater degree of assault than the officer. thats insane. if someone kicked their shoes off in your direction would you charge them with assault? no, bc its a fucking shoe! not a bomb, not bullets from a gun, not a knife! a fucking shoe!lowing wrote:
I am not the champion of anything, I merely feel that if a citizen thinks they have the "right" or the "freedom" to assault police officers. They have another "think" coming.ATG wrote:
You say gangster, I say patriot.
I say the Second Amendment is to protect the citizenry from this kind of tyranny.
Lowing says this kind of tyranny is good. And he claims to be the forums champion of freedom and liberty, lol.
Say say " gasp, I can't believe he said that ".
I say tough times call for straight talk.
I don't like where our country is going and refer you to the reasons our founding fathers cited for revolution against King George.
Think about it; if Lowing kicked a girl, dragged her by her hair, punched her in the head, do you think he would be charged with 4th degree assault?
Selective application of law is anarchy.
So embrace the anarchy. They brought it on.
You fail to acknowledge what I acknowledge, that cops are made up of PEOPLE we charge with our safety. In this task they are face with the worst society has to offer everyday. For their efforts, we thank them by armchair quarter-backing, FRAME BY FRAME mind you, every incident that is recorded in a desporate effort to find a law suit.
What I am saying is, if this guy got outa hand, I understand and appreciate what might have drove him to it, and I sympathize with that reality more than I do the criminal he is trying to deal with.
so what if she was mouthing off or whatever, there is NO excuse for slamming a girls head into the wall, punching her in the face while shes on her stomach, and lifting her up by her hair. that is despicable and cowardly.
I take it you have never been arrested?lowing wrote:
You hang on your 20/20 hindsight, fraqme by frame played and rewoundm and played again viewpoint of things like this. I appreciate the heat of the moment, the interaction between cop and criminal, unre-hersed, not subjected to do overs, couldas,shouldas, or wouldas.Macbeth wrote:
They'll be investigations afterward though. If something wrong was done then somebody will be punished, if not they'll be cleared.lowing wrote:
Apparently you didn't read my over all attitude towrd criminals and the police.
I did read the story, my post was a generality in reference to most incidents of recorded police brutality.
In scenarios between cop and criminal you will find me on the side of the cops as my first knee jerk reaction. Unlike ATG, who apparently arms himself to shoot cops.
Every able bodied man has a constitutional duty to protect his fellow citizenry from ALL enemies foreign and DOMESTIC.
Uhhhhhhhhhhhh yeah, that would be a pretty safe assumption. Now, do you dare ask me why I have never been arrested or in jail?Macbeth wrote:
I take it you have never been arrested?lowing wrote:
You hang on your 20/20 hindsight, fraqme by frame played and rewoundm and played again viewpoint of things like this. I appreciate the heat of the moment, the interaction between cop and criminal, unre-hersed, not subjected to do overs, couldas,shouldas, or wouldas.Macbeth wrote:
They'll be investigations afterward though. If something wrong was done then somebody will be punished, if not they'll be cleared.
In scenarios between cop and criminal you will find me on the side of the cops as my first knee jerk reaction. Unlike ATG, who apparently arms himself to shoot cops.
bc you ARE the law?lowing wrote:
Uhhhhhhhhhhhh yeah, that would be a pretty safe assumption. Now, do you dare ask me why I have never been arrested or in jail?Macbeth wrote:
I take it you have never been arrested?lowing wrote:
You hang on your 20/20 hindsight, fraqme by frame played and rewoundm and played again viewpoint of things like this. I appreciate the heat of the moment, the interaction between cop and criminal, unre-hersed, not subjected to do overs, couldas,shouldas, or wouldas.
In scenarios between cop and criminal you will find me on the side of the cops as my first knee jerk reaction. Unlike ATG, who apparently arms himself to shoot cops.
Sure; why haven't you ever been to jail or arrested?lowing wrote:
Uhhhhhhhhhhhh yeah, that would be a pretty safe assumption. Now, do you dare ask me why I have never been arrested or in jail?Macbeth wrote:
I take it you have never been arrested?lowing wrote:
You hang on your 20/20 hindsight, fraqme by frame played and rewoundm and played again viewpoint of things like this. I appreciate the heat of the moment, the interaction between cop and criminal, unre-hersed, not subjected to do overs, couldas,shouldas, or wouldas.
In scenarios between cop and criminal you will find me on the side of the cops as my first knee jerk reaction. Unlike ATG, who apparently arms himself to shoot cops.
lowing wrote:
Uhhhhhhhhhhhh yeah, that would be a pretty safe assumption. Now, do you dare ask me why I have never been arrested or in jail?Macbeth wrote:
I take it you have never been arrested?lowing wrote:
You hang on your 20/20 hindsight, fraqme by frame played and rewoundm and played again viewpoint of things like this. I appreciate the heat of the moment, the interaction between cop and criminal, unre-hersed, not subjected to do overs, couldas,shouldas, or wouldas.
In scenarios between cop and criminal you will find me on the side of the cops as my first knee jerk reaction. Unlike ATG, who apparently arms himself to shoot cops.
Yer right, i just view criminals as a bigger problem than the police we charge in dealing with themATG wrote:
Every able bodied man has a constitutional duty to protect his fellow citizenry from ALL enemies foreign and DOMESTIC.
In terms of numbers, yes, in terms of overall damage to society, no.lowing wrote:
Yer right, i just view criminals as a bigger problem than the police we charge in dealing with themATG wrote:
Every able bodied man has a constitutional duty to protect his fellow citizenry from ALL enemies foreign and DOMESTIC.
they are? i thought they were humans who just do their job.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
And not just any Joe Schmoe beating up a 15 year old girl, but a cop. You know, the guys who are supposed to be the pinnacle examples of following the law and being good?
lol, that is a good one.ATG wrote:
http://i42.tinypic.com/2h4ytme.giflowing wrote:
Uhhhhhhhhhhhh yeah, that would be a pretty safe assumption. Now, do you dare ask me why I have never been arrested or in jail?Macbeth wrote:
I take it you have never been arrested?
I gotta disagree though, I do not think my doing what is right by my family and our laws makes me a sheep.
really, give the criminal free reign and watch what happens, see if you will stick by that notion.ATG wrote:
In terms of numbers, yes, in terms of overall damage to society, no.lowing wrote:
Yer right, i just view criminals as a bigger problem than the police we charge in dealing with themATG wrote:
Every able bodied man has a constitutional duty to protect his fellow citizenry from ALL enemies foreign and DOMESTIC.
Jesus lowing.lowing wrote:
lol, that is a good one.ATG wrote:
http://i42.tinypic.com/2h4ytme.giflowing wrote:
Uhhhhhhhhhhhh yeah, that would be a pretty safe assumption. Now, do you dare ask me why I have never been arrested or in jail?
I gotta disagree though, I do not think my doing what is right by my family and our laws makes me a sheep.
Was that cop following law? Or rational behavior?
Is that the image of law enforcement you want your kids seeing?
Is 4th degree assault anywhere near an appropriate charge?
Again, ask yourself; what if that was me that punched a 15 year old?
Do you embrace double standards?
I never said the cop was right in what he did, I am saying I question what the girl did, that drove him to that point. I am quite sure it was a little more than the shoe. Given this, I sympathize with cops more than criminals. Nothing more nothing less.ATG wrote:
Jesus lowing.lowing wrote:
lol, that is a good one.
I gotta disagree though, I do not think my doing what is right by my family and our laws makes me a sheep.
Was that cop following law? Or rational behavior?
Is that the image of law enforcement you want your kids seeing?
Is 4th degree assault anywhere near an appropriate charge?
Again, ask yourself; what if that was me that punched a 15 year old?
Do you embrace double standards?
Why one level of discipline for citizens and one for...pigs?
/oh snap.usmarine wrote:
go fuck yourself you little internet emo. why dont you go smoke a bowl and hang yourself already.ATG wrote:
Why one level of discipline for citizens and one for...pigs?
marine will get banned or rage quit soon.
Such a pity, his posts always added so much.
/not.
You are a girl beater lover.lowing wrote:
I never said the cop was right in what he did, I am saying I question what the girl did, that drove him to that point. I am quite sure it was a little more than the shoe. Given this, I sympathize with cops more than criminals. Nothing more nothing less.ATG wrote:
Jesus lowing.lowing wrote:
lol, that is a good one.
I gotta disagree though, I do not think my doing what is right by my family and our laws makes me a sheep.
Was that cop following law? Or rational behavior?
Is that the image of law enforcement you want your kids seeing?
Is 4th degree assault anywhere near an appropriate charge?
Again, ask yourself; what if that was me that punched a 15 year old?
Do you embrace double standards?
Why one level of discipline for citizens and one for...pigs?
Shame.