so, she's not a tax evading criminal bitch who wanted to be the VP?LividBovine wrote:
Wow, nice post. You have any more to say, or did you wear yourself out with that one?Reciprocity wrote:
tax evading criminal bitch.
They didn't even know there were taxes on the stupid per diem. You think she would have avoided paying like 5k in taxes on purpose, and not any more than that? Get realistic. Comparing her tax issues to the idiots Obama is putting in place is rather stupid. This at least seems like an honest mistake.
Edit: Oh yeah, like Marine said. She is not being placed into the so called ethical cabinet that is supposed to set the new standard for ethics and transparency.
Edit: Oh yeah, like Marine said. She is not being placed into the so called ethical cabinet that is supposed to set the new standard for ethics and transparency.
Last edited by LividBovine (2009-02-20 19:03:53)
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
dont try dude. most of the people on here dont even have to file their own taxes (too young)LividBovine wrote:
They didn't even know there were taxes on the stupid per diem. You think she would have avoided paying like 5k in taxes on purpose, and not any more than that? Get realistic. Comparing her tax issues to the idiots Obama is putting in place is rather stupid. This at least seems like an honest mistake.
Last edited by usmarine (2009-02-20 19:04:29)
Your right. I feel like I am waisting my time here sometimes. Maybe I should move to the EE.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
her tax evasion is different than those other people's?
technically no different than anyone else. but, when it comes to politics...yes. you should know that.Reciprocity wrote:
her tax evasion is different than those other people's?
QFEusmarine wrote:
technically no different than anyone else. but, when it comes to politics...yes. you should know that.Reciprocity wrote:
her tax evasion is different than those other people's?
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
so can I not pay taxes? I don't like the state and feds taking half my money. I'd rather keep it. I'm gunna keep it.
all i was saying was thet she missed paying taxes. no biggie right? Wesley snipes did it too.
p.s. if she was a dem, u'd be all over this like a fat kid on a skittle. and dont try to make me believe you wouldnt.
p.s. if she was a dem, u'd be all over this like a fat kid on a skittle. and dont try to make me believe you wouldnt.
I find it hilarious. Daschle and Geithner are called "tax cheats" by some here (not saying they are or aren't, just repeating lines), yet when a tax issue comes up with Palin, the same people are quick to defend her.
Everyone defending her or trying to make excuses for her knows DAMN well they'd be on her case the minute they heard about this if she was a democrat.
Everyone defending her or trying to make excuses for her knows DAMN well they'd be on her case the minute they heard about this if she was a democrat.
Obscure state law regarding per Diem. Travel's a bitch and so is its accounting. I wonder if she did her own taxes. Honest mistake. Shit it's worked before, Right Tom?lowing wrote:
Amy per Diem that I have earned or heard off has always been tax exempt. Not sure what is going on here.destruktion_6143 wrote:
Whoopsie
Read it here first....
The first major Republican Politician has been targeted by the IRS under the Obama administration. Who's next?
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
The only reason this was posted is the Liberals are trying to play down the fact that so many of the appointees have Major tax issues. If this is the dirt they can find to throw up against the dirt on Obama's team, then wow. GG.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
This shit originated back in october, maybe earlier.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Read it here first....
The first major Republican Politician has been targeted by the IRS under the Obama administration. Who's next?
im not doin it on part of the "liberal agenda" just saying. ffs everything "anti-repub" on this forum is taken as a personal attack by you and your likes. tax evasion is tax evasion. intentional or not. you forget to pay some tax, its called evasion.LividBovine wrote:
The only reason this was posted is the Liberals are trying to play down the fact that so many of the appointees have Major tax issues. If this is the dirt they can find to throw up against the dirt on Obama's team, then wow. GG.
and im sure that obamas admin is not "targeting major GOP members"
Who posted it?Reciprocity wrote:
This shit originated back in october, maybe earlier.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Read it here first....
The first major Republican Politician has been targeted by the IRS under the Obama administration. Who's next?
*edit: and if so, it appears to be coming true.
Last edited by DBBrinson1 (2009-02-20 19:31:45)
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
And are you not doing the same exact thing? Trying to play THIS down?LividBovine wrote:
The only reason this was posted is the Liberals are trying to play down the fact that so many of the appointees have Major tax issues. If this is the dirt they can find to throw up against the dirt on Obama's team, then wow. GG.
Hmm.
They're all guilty, regardless of party.
so why do you care what the governor of alaska does? cant let it go can you guys? concentrate on the incompetent fucks in charge of the country, not the people not in charge of it.
I am just calling the comparison, you guys are trying to make, stupid.Poseidon wrote:
And are you not doing the same exact thing? Trying to play THIS down?LividBovine wrote:
The only reason this was posted is the Liberals are trying to play down the fact that so many of the appointees have Major tax issues. If this is the dirt they can find to throw up against the dirt on Obama's team, then wow. GG.
Hmm.
They're all guilty, regardless of party.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
So what do you do to your COS then?Poseidon wrote:
And are you not doing the same exact thing? Trying to play THIS down?LividBovine wrote:
The only reason this was posted is the Liberals are trying to play down the fact that so many of the appointees have Major tax issues. If this is the dirt they can find to throw up against the dirt on Obama's team, then wow. GG.
Hmm.
They're all guilty, regardless of party.
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2 … dache-for/
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
I dont know if it was posted here, but it was in the news 4 or 5 months ago.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Who posted it?
*edit: and if so, it appears to be coming true.
Bullshit you are. You're trying to play it down for the simple fact that she's one of your beloved Republicans. Don't try to deny it - it's painfully obvious.LividBovine wrote:
I am just calling the comparison, you guys are trying to make, stupid.Poseidon wrote:
And are you not doing the same exact thing? Trying to play THIS down?LividBovine wrote:
The only reason this was posted is the Liberals are trying to play down the fact that so many of the appointees have Major tax issues. If this is the dirt they can find to throw up against the dirt on Obama's team, then wow. GG.
Hmm.
They're all guilty, regardless of party.
If it's true, he's guilty as well. But I'm not about to crucify someone because of tax issues. I wouldn't crucify Palin because of this. I don't like Palin for a myriad of other issues.DBBrinson1 wrote:
So what do you do to your COS then?Poseidon wrote:
And are you not doing the same exact thing? Trying to play THIS down?LividBovine wrote:
The only reason this was posted is the Liberals are trying to play down the fact that so many of the appointees have Major tax issues. If this is the dirt they can find to throw up against the dirt on Obama's team, then wow. GG.
Hmm.
They're all guilty, regardless of party.
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2 … dache-for/
Oh I know your plethora of positions on Palin.Poseidon wrote:
If it's true, he's guilty as well. But I'm not about to crucify someone because of tax issues. I wouldn't crucify Palin because of this. I don't like Palin for a myriad of other issues.DBBrinson1 wrote:
So what do you do to your COS then?Poseidon wrote:
And are you not doing the same exact thing? Trying to play THIS down?
Hmm.
They're all guilty, regardless of party.
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2 … dache-for/
But still what do you mean? Didn't the present VP boasted of ones patriotic duty to pay taxes? Everyone applauded.... at any rate.
Fine. I'd wager your proposal to be that too, but imagine you stopped the 'crucificion' -so pray tell, what shalt the penalty be?
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
whatever the IRS states the penalty is for her tax "issue"DBBrinson1 wrote:
Oh I know your plethora of positions on Palin.Poseidon wrote:
If it's true, he's guilty as well. But I'm not about to crucify someone because of tax issues. I wouldn't crucify Palin because of this. I don't like Palin for a myriad of other issues.DBBrinson1 wrote:
So what do you do to your COS then?
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2 … dache-for/
But still what do you mean? Didn't the present VP boasted of ones patriotic duty to pay taxes? Everyone applauded.... at any rate.
Fine. I'd wager your proposal to be that too, but imagine you stopped the 'crucificion' -so pray tell, what shalt the penalty be?
I was referring to his COS.destruktion_6143 wrote:
whatever the IRS states the penalty is for her tax "issue"DBBrinson1 wrote:
Oh I know your plethora of positions on Palin.Poseidon wrote:
If it's true, he's guilty as well. But I'm not about to crucify someone because of tax issues. I wouldn't crucify Palin because of this. I don't like Palin for a myriad of other issues.
But still what do you mean? Didn't the present VP boasted of ones patriotic duty to pay taxes? Everyone applauded.... at any rate.
Fine. I'd wager your proposal to be that too, but imagine you stopped the 'crucificion' -so pray tell, what shalt the penalty be?
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
I was referring to his COS.destruktion_6143 wrote:
whatever the IRS states the penalty is for her tax "issue"DBBrinson1 wrote:
Oh I know your plethora of positions on Palin.Poseidon wrote:
If it's true, he's guilty as well. But I'm not about to crucify someone because of tax issues. I wouldn't crucify Palin because of this. I don't like Palin for a myriad of other issues.
But still what do you mean? Didn't the present VP boasted of ones patriotic duty to pay taxes? Everyone applauded.... at any rate.
Fine. I'd wager your proposal to be that too, but imagine you stopped the 'crucificion' -so pray tell, what shalt the penalty be?
DBBrinson1 wrote:
So what do you do to your COS then?
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2 … dache-for/
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.