He's right they are losers, I wish he could kick all thier asses.
Last edited by Roc18 (2009-02-18 14:08:18)
Last edited by Roc18 (2009-02-18 14:08:18)
That's not the point man, they hid behind the law and that kept him from kicking those losers' ass.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Wouldn't the second amendment help them get their ass kicked?
Last edited by Roc18 (2009-02-18 13:57:20)
For lack of me wanting to google it, how?Roc18 wrote:
the 2nd amendment prevents him from kicking all their asses.
It doesn't. It does let people buy Mk.19 40mm cannons in certain states, but unlike the first amendment, it doesn't protect the right of peaceful protest.mcminty wrote:
For lack of me wanting to google it, how?Roc18 wrote:
the 2nd amendment prevents him from kicking all their asses.
Last edited by DoctaStrangelove (2009-02-18 14:00:26)
Because they can shoot him if he tries anything.mcminty wrote:
For lack of me wanting to google it, how?Roc18 wrote:
the 2nd amendment prevents him from kicking all their asses.
The law is the law sonny both sides can say what they want, as for the pushing and grabbing i dont know.Roc18 wrote:
That's not the point man, they hid behind the law and that kept him from kicking those losers' ass.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Wouldn't the second amendment help them get their ass kicked?
I know but I really wanted see what would happen if he was allowed to fight them.Mitch wrote:
The law is the law sonny both sides can say what they want, as for the pushing and grabbing i dont know.Roc18 wrote:
That's not the point man, they hid behind the law and that kept him from kicking those losers' ass.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Wouldn't the second amendment help them get their ass kicked?
That sounds like a fucking stupid deal, tbh.ghettoperson wrote:
Because they can shoot him if he tries anything.mcminty wrote:
For lack of me wanting to google it, how?Roc18 wrote:
the 2nd amendment prevents him from kicking all their asses.
They were supposedly being non-violent in public and werent videotaping him for money. So they are allowed to do it I guess.mcminty wrote:
That sounds like a fucking stupid deal, tbh.ghettoperson wrote:
Because they can shoot him if he tries anything.mcminty wrote:
For lack of me wanting to google it, how?
Heh, why didn't the cops get the 4chan people to go away - it's obvious they were harassing him...
Lolsy...Roc18 wrote:
They were supposedly being non-violent in public and werent videotaping him for money. So they are allowed to do it I guess.mcminty wrote:
That sounds like a fucking stupid deal, tbh.ghettoperson wrote:
Because they can shoot him if he tries anything.
Heh, why didn't the cops get the 4chan people to go away - it's obvious they were harassing him...
Amirite?http://www.uslawbooks.com/books/harass.htm wrote:
Harassment: General
Under the United States Code Title 18 Subsection 1514(c)1. Harassment is defined as "a course of conduct directed at a specific person that causes substantial emotional distress in such a person and serves no legitimate purpose".
Well im not a lawyer but that's the jist I got from the video.mcminty wrote:
Lolsy...Roc18 wrote:
They were supposedly being non-violent in public and werent videotaping him for money. So they are allowed to do it I guess.mcminty wrote:
That sounds like a fucking stupid deal, tbh.
Heh, why didn't the cops get the 4chan people to go away - it's obvious they were harassing him...Amirite?http://www.uslawbooks.com/books/harass.htm wrote:
Harassment: General
Under the United States Code Title 18 Subsection 1514(c)1. Harassment is defined as "a course of conduct directed at a specific person that causes substantial emotional distress in such a person and serves no legitimate purpose".
That was the photography part. The scientologist was a fool claiming they couldn't photograph/film him, as it was in a public area. That being said, they were harassing him, which is illegal. Also, if they use the video to "tarnish is good name" (or whatever the fuck lawyers say), he could have some sort of civil slander/libel case against them...Roc18 wrote:
Well im not a lawyer but that's the jist I got from the video.