Obama is gonna get us all houses...

2009-02-11 16:01:39

#1

Catbox: forgiveness; +505|7019

http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivoro … -oops.html
and the house was given by a republican... they are all crazy...

and if you don't like your job... you can get a better one....

I wan't a house and i wan't to be healed... lol... I wonder how many calls they will get from people wanting their free house...?

Last edited by [TUF]Catbox (2009-02-11 18:51:15)

Love is the answer

2009-02-11 16:05:14

#2

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5889

Trying my hardest not to judge those people but I'm struggling really, especially the young guy.

Anyway I guess this could be used by some people who are totally down with the Obama admin to say this is a sign of hope that there are some people who are willing to help others because they're inspired.

Something like that.

2009-02-11 16:09:00

#3

Ilocano: buuuurrrrrrppppp.......; +341|6970

Benny Hinn, here we come...

2009-02-11 16:17:03

#4

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,983|6935|949

A Republican State Rep's wife gave the home away, not Obama. Obama told her to contact the Housing Authority.

The guy got a job for one day announcing a minor league baseball game on the radio.

So what's the point of this again?

2009-02-11 16:21:03

#5

Catbox: forgiveness; +505|7019

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
A Republican State Rep's wife gave the home away, not Obama. Obama told her to contact the Housing Authority.

The guy got a job for one day announcing a minor league baseball game on the radio.

So what's the point of this again?

figures you wouldn't have a problem with this.. and i said a republican gave her a house... they are all crazy...
I wasn't only calling out your Messiah... relax

Love is the answer

2009-02-11 16:22:07

#6

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,983|6935|949

What are you calling him out on?

I didn't vote for him, I don't really care for him. I've yet to see much of anything that would make me support him. I'm just trying to make sense of the OP.

2009-02-11 16:25:35

#7

Catbox: forgiveness; +505|7019

sorry you can't make sense of it...

Love is the answer

2009-02-11 18:23:56

#8

Harmor: Error_Name_Not_Found; +605|6851|San Diego, CA, USA

Is she going to be like the democratic version of 'Joe the Plumber'?

2009-02-11 19:53:54

#9

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6954|USA

I read a very truthful observation about this, and it is undeniably true

In order for Obama to give this woman a house, like she is begging him for, he would have to take it from someone else who worked for it paid for it and in fact earned it.

2009-02-12 01:13:16

#10

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6978|Canberra, AUS

lowing wrote:
I read a very truthful observation about this, and it is undeniably true

In order for Obama to give this woman a house, like she is begging him for, he would have to take it from someone else who worked for it paid for it and in fact earned it.

Hmm... I'm sure there isn't a shortage of empty houses around, but I get your drift.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2009-02-12 01:26:27

#11

JahManRed: wank; +646|6931|IRELAND

lowing wrote:
I read a very truthful observation about this, and it is undeniably true

In order for Obama to give this woman a house, like she is begging him for, he would have to take it from someone else who worked for it paid for it and in fact earned it.

Perhaps like here, it will be a Housing Association programme, where you own half the house and the association owns the other half. The Premiums are affordable and after 10 years you can buy the other half.
Or perhaps he is going to give her a government owned house and charge her rent. Then after 15 years you get the chance to buy the house bellow market rate. I seriously doubt he can giver her a free house. It would set a precedent.
Socialism FTW!

2009-02-12 01:40:28

#12

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,060|7075|PNW

Obama's going to buy me a house.

Twice.

[TUF]Catbox wrote:
I wan't a house and i wan't to be healed... lol... I wonder how many calls they will get from people wanting their free house...?

It's 'want.'

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2009-02-12 01:41:25)

2009-02-12 01:48:46

#13

Catbox: forgiveness; +505|7019

ok... i was so excited about my new house i am using the bad grammar...
go outside and meet a girl or something... lol... j/k
you don't have to go outside...

Last edited by [TUF]Catbox (2009-02-12 01:49:27)

Love is the answer

2009-02-12 02:14:11

#14

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,060|7075|PNW

[TUF]Catbox wrote:
ok... i was so excited about my new house i am using the bad grammar...
go outside and meet a girl or something... lol... j/k
you don't have to go outside...

I work outside at random times around the clock most of the year. I don't have time for a 'friend' that'll suck my soul and bank account dry...at least not until I shift to 'mostly-office.'

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2009-02-12 02:14:45)

2009-02-12 02:52:18

#15

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6954|USA

JahManRed wrote:
lowing wrote:
I read a very truthful observation about this, and it is undeniably true

In order for Obama to give this woman a house, like she is begging him for, he would have to take it from someone else who worked for it paid for it and in fact earned it.
Perhaps like here, it will be a Housing Association programme, where you own half the house and the association owns the other half. The Premiums are affordable and after 10 years you can buy the other half.
Or perhaps he is going to give her a government owned house and charge her rent. Then after 15 years you get the chance to buy the house bellow market rate. I seriously doubt he can giver her a free house. It would set a precedent.
Socialism FTW!

Ok you do realize the GOVT. does not own anything, the taxpayers do, so basically my argument stands. This woman wants and expects a free house. Who is working and paying for it?

2009-02-12 03:04:16

#16

Varegg: Support fanatic :-); +2,206|7113|Nårvei

lowing wrote:
JahManRed wrote:
lowing wrote:
I read a very truthful observation about this, and it is undeniably true

In order for Obama to give this woman a house, like she is begging him for, he would have to take it from someone else who worked for it paid for it and in fact earned it.
Perhaps like here, it will be a Housing Association programme, where you own half the house and the association owns the other half. The Premiums are affordable and after 10 years you can buy the other half.
Or perhaps he is going to give her a government owned house and charge her rent. Then after 15 years you get the chance to buy the house bellow market rate. I seriously doubt he can giver her a free house. It would set a precedent.
Socialism FTW!
Ok you do realize the GOVT. does not own anything, the taxpayers do, so basically my argument stands. This woman wants and expects a free house. Who is working and paying for it?

Was it not a republican that gave away that house and not Obama?

Wait behind the line ..............................................................

2009-02-12 03:10:04

#17

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6954|USA

Varegg wrote:
lowing wrote:
JahManRed wrote:

Perhaps like here, it will be a Housing Association programme, where you own half the house and the association owns the other half. The Premiums are affordable and after 10 years you can buy the other half.
Or perhaps he is going to give her a government owned house and charge her rent. Then after 15 years you get the chance to buy the house bellow market rate. I seriously doubt he can giver her a free house. It would set a precedent.
Socialism FTW!
Ok you do realize the GOVT. does not own anything, the taxpayers do, so basically my argument stands. This woman wants and expects a free house. Who is working and paying for it?
Was it not a republican that gave away that house and not Obama?

Yup that is called charity, not a govt. handout, the tax payers were not burdoned at all. THis is not what she expected, I bet it was not what Obama expected either. I guess I do not need t opoint out the irony of the fact it was a Repulican and not a socialist that was charitable. Ironic huh?

2009-02-12 03:17:04

#18

Catbox: forgiveness; +505|7019

that's what i was thinking... Obama was at a loss for words... walked over and kissed her forehead... and handed her a business card... the republican guy got her a house... lol

Love is the answer

2009-02-12 03:23:09

#19

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6593|Éire

Obama is great... free houses. What's not to like!?

Lowing, I'd say your blood pressure is going through the roof with stories like these!? I'd like to presume that the house she got is something along the lines of council housing over here, whereby you have very reasonable rent and an option to buy after a number of years... because if it's free houses with no strings attached it's utterly stupid... and NOT socialism.

2009-02-12 03:50:38

#20

Varegg: Support fanatic :-); +2,206|7113|Nårvei

lowing wrote:
Varegg wrote:
lowing wrote:

Ok you do realize the GOVT. does not own anything, the taxpayers do, so basically my argument stands. This woman wants and expects a free house. Who is working and paying for it?
Was it not a republican that gave away that house and not Obama?
Yup that is called charity, not a govt. handout, the tax payers were not burdoned at all. THis is not what she expected, I bet it was not what Obama expected either. I guess I do not need t opoint out the irony of the fact it was a Repulican and not a socialist that was charitable. Ironic huh?

I'm going to answer you in a typical lowing way: So damn pathetic of republicunts to help just one person and not acknowledge that the problem is much larger than getting one person housing, populistic bullcrap ... Obamas goal is to help America and try to find solutions that benefits all citizens, guess the republicunts are so desperate for votes they buy them one at the time.

Wait behind the line ..............................................................

2009-02-12 06:46:21

#21

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7065

Varegg wrote:
Obamas goal is to help America and try to find solutions that benefits all citizens

lol

wow.

ya, he sure is isnt he? so instead of spending his time writing the bill first, he handed it to pelosi and the other knobs to write. which by any standard is an act of lunacy. right right. so he could spend time on gitmo and apppeasing people who we dont give a flying fuck what they think.

2009-02-12 06:49:59

#22

Varegg: Support fanatic :-); +2,206|7113|Nårvei

usmarine wrote:
Varegg wrote:
Obamas goal is to help America and try to find solutions that benefits all citizens
lol

wow.

ya, he sure is isnt he? so instead of spending his time writing the bill first, he handed it to pelosi and the other knobs to write. which by any standard is an act of lunacy. right right. so he could spend time on gitmo and apppeasing people who we dont give a flying fuck what they think.

You really are a little out of touch with reality it seems ... didn't you vote for Obama btw?

Wait behind the line ..............................................................

2009-02-12 06:53:43

#23

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7065

Varegg wrote:
You really are a little out of touch with reality it seems ... didn't you vote for Obama btw?

no one liners kthx mr preacher of debate etiquette. pls explain then. he did not write the bill.

2009-02-12 06:58:36

#24

Varegg: Support fanatic :-); +2,206|7113|Nårvei

usmarine wrote:
Varegg wrote:
You really are a little out of touch with reality it seems ... didn't you vote for Obama btw?
no one liners kthx mr preacher of debate etiquette. pls explain then. he did not write the bill.

I had the impression this bill was a joint venture by the congress, a bipartisan work promoted by Obama ...

But that is really not the topic in this thread if you care to read it from the top ...

Wait behind the line ..............................................................

2009-02-12 07:00:58

#25

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7065

Varegg wrote:
usmarine wrote:
Varegg wrote:
You really are a little out of touch with reality it seems ... didn't you vote for Obama btw?
no one liners kthx mr preacher of debate etiquette. pls explain then. he did not write the bill.
I had the impression this bill was a joint venture by the congress, a bipartisan work promoted by Obama ...

But that is really not the topic in this thread if you care to read it from the top ...

so what? since when do you care who talks about the OP? oh thats right, only when certain people do it.

anyway, to call it a joint venture would mean you are the one out of touch with reality my dear. and obama SHOULD have written the bill first, then handed it over. but, i guess this is the change we expected tbh.

BF2S Forums Obama is gonna get us all houses...

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

lowing wrote:

lowing wrote:

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

lowing wrote:

lowing wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

lowing wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Varegg wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Varegg wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Board footer