Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6452|'straya
A NEW York man has pleaded guilty to a series of racist assaults meant to protest against the election of President Barack Obama that left one victim in a coma, the US Department of Justice says

Ralph Nicoletti, 18, was the last of four defendants to plead guilty in federal court to three hate crime assaults on the night of Obama's election as the first African-American president of the United States.

The other co-defendants are Bryan Garaventa, 18, Michael Contreras, 18, and Brian Carranza, 21.
If convicted, they each face sentences of up to 10 years in prison. As part of his plea, Nicoletti agreed to a 12-year sentence subject to the court's approval.

At the plea proceeding, Nicoletti admitted that he and his co-defendants "decided to assault African-Americans in Staten Island (New York) after President Obama was declared the winner of the election on November 4.

"The defendants targeted African-Americans believing they had voted for President Obama,'' the Justice Department said.

Nicoletti drove the group to a predominantly African-American neighbourhood of Staten Island, where Nicoletti hit an African-American teenager with a metal pipe and Garaventa struck him with a police baton.

In a separate location on the island, the group assaulted an African-American man, whom Garaventa tripped and pushed to the ground.

In the third assault, Nicoletti ran his car over an individual the group mistakenly identified as an African-American. US media said the victim was Ronald Forte, a white man. Forte sustained serious injuries and was in a coma for several weeks.

US Attorney Benton Campbell called the attacks "shocking and deplorable.''

"In a night of historic significance, these four angry men assaulted their victims in an attempt to punish them for exercising a fundamental right of all Americans - the right to vote. Those who commit such crimes will be swiftly apprehended, prosecuted and punished,'' he added.

"In attempting to intimidate voters, the defendants also violated the victims' civil rights in a way that was an attack on the democratic process,'' said Joseph Demarest, Assistant Director-in-Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's New York Field Office.
Well sounds like America does need change. Running over a white person because they thought he was a african-american person who voted for obama.... nice.
Source: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 97,00.html
destruktion_6143
Was ist Loos?
+154|6930|Canada
lol, obama supporters are gonna look both ways before crossing now
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6452|'straya

destruktion_6143 wrote:

lol, obama supporters are gonna look both ways before crossing now
haha yer massive fail on the drivers part though
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6803|so randum
No, this is just a bunch of fucking racists.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6452|'straya
Mods this can be move to EE if you want... that may avoid the flame war which might occur
mtb0minime
minimember
+2,418|6958

Well it's nice to know racism is still alive and well and not part of Obama's "change" campaign...
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6409|eXtreme to the maX
Its black peoples fault that there are racists.
If there weren't any black people no one would need to be racist.
The solution seems obvious enough.
Fuck Israel
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6978|Canberra, AUS
Eh... is there a bug with your post LBJ? Because all of your posts appear twice at the same time for some reason.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,060|7075|PNW

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

Well sounds like America does need change. Running over a white person because they thought he was a african-american person who voted for obama.... nice.
Source: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 97,00.html
Sounds like another broad generalization of the term. 'Change for America.' That's like...'Genesis does what Nintendon't,' only that old piece of rubbish wasn't nearly as ambiguous as 2008 campaign tripe. Honestly, I don't even want to hear any of the old campaign slogans, even in paraphrase. At least not until my stomach's settled from the whole grotesque spectacle.

But no, it's not Obama's fault. The responsibility clearly lies upon the shoulders of all those nasty McCain supporters.
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6452|'straya

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

Well sounds like America does need change. Running over a white person because they thought he was a african-american person who voted for obama.... nice.
Source: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 97,00.html
Sounds like another broad generalization of the term. 'Change for America.' That's like...'Genesis does what Nintendon't,' only that old piece of rubbish wasn't nearly as ambiguous as 2008 campaign tripe. Honestly, I don't even want to hear any of the old campaign slogans, even in paraphrase. At least not until my stomach's settled from the whole grotesque spectacle.

But no, it's not Obama's fault. The responsibility clearly lies upon the shoulders of all those nasty McCain supporters.
lol the America needs change thing was mainly just a joke... and more like nasty racists, after all i'm not going to generalize all McCain supporters as racist.
Surgeons
U shud proabbly f off u fat prik
+3,097|6793|Gogledd Cymru

He should get a lot more than 12 fucking years.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA
Not sure where you get the idea that I would hold some one accountable for the actions of someone else. In this case, blaming Nobama for this. Oh well, I guess you just don't understand what it means to be held accountable for your actions and your decisions. YOu musta been raised by liberals.
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7113|Nårvei

lowing wrote:

Not sure where you get the idea that I would hold some one accountable for the actions of someone else. In this case, blaming Nobama for this. Oh well, I guess you just don't understand what it means to be held accountable for your actions and your decisions. YOu musta been raised by liberals.
From where do you get the idea that liberals aren't accountable for their actions?
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6456|what

The Sheriff wrote:

He should get a lot more than 12 fucking years.
Plea deal or no, he sounds like the ring leader. He should cop the worst sentence of the lot.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA

Varegg wrote:

lowing wrote:

Not sure where you get the idea that I would hold some one accountable for the actions of someone else. In this case, blaming Nobama for this. Oh well, I guess you just don't understand what it means to be held accountable for your actions and your decisions. YOu musta been raised by liberals.
From where do you get the idea that liberals aren't accountable for their actions?
Ummmmmmmm, ACLU lawyers screaming about criminal rights over victims rights. frivilous lawsuits, never accepting blame for their demise, it is always someone else's fault. wealth envy, supports redistribution of someone else' s money to them. KATRINA!! Just little things like that
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7113|Nårvei

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

lowing wrote:

Not sure where you get the idea that I would hold some one accountable for the actions of someone else. In this case, blaming Nobama for this. Oh well, I guess you just don't understand what it means to be held accountable for your actions and your decisions. YOu musta been raised by liberals.
From where do you get the idea that liberals aren't accountable for their actions?
Ummmmmmmm, ACLU lawyers screaming about criminal rights over victims rights. frivilous lawsuits, never accepting blame for their demise, it is always someone else's fault. wealth envy, supports redistribution of someone else' s money to them. KATRINA!! Just little things like that
And where is the documentation to back up this statement, is there records showing these claims?

You throw the phrase liberals around in a very ignorant way lowing ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
JahManRed
wank
+646|6931|IRELAND

lowing wrote:

Not sure where you get the idea that I would hold some one accountable for the actions of someone else. In this case, blaming Nobama for this. Oh well, I guess you just don't understand what it means to be held accountable for your actions and your decisions. YOu musta been raised by liberals.
Many many people are accountable for their actions and still would like so see their money go into social programmes. I think you forget about that group of people.
You only ever talk about the "accountable people"(Cons) like you. Or "scroungers"(Libs) basically everyone else. Like there is only two groups of ppl in America.

What about the "accountable" people who work hard, want and choose to give a small portion of their earning to help ppl get a leg up or pay into social programmes for the good of their country as a whole? What "box" do they fit in? Considering they worked hard to earn their money. Are they still a Lib. Or are they some kind of hybrid?
Ajax_the_Great1
Dropped on request
+206|6950

TheAussieReaper wrote:

The Sheriff wrote:

He should get a lot more than 12 fucking years.
Plea deal or no, he sounds like the ring leader. He should cop the worst sentence of the lot.
Thats a lot of time in jail just for assault. ...Well the car thing was pretty bad but still, the kind of people they are shouldn't affect your judgement.

Wheres that clip of south park explaining hate crimes when you need it?
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6456|what

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

Thats a lot of time in jail just for assault. ...Well the car thing was pretty bad but still, the kind of people they are shouldn't affect your judgement.

Wheres that clip of south park explaining hate crimes when you need it?
It was premeditated, planned and methodical. You could throw in conspiracy too since he planned it with others to commit these crimes at the same time.

It was more than just assault.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA

JahManRed wrote:

lowing wrote:

Not sure where you get the idea that I would hold some one accountable for the actions of someone else. In this case, blaming Nobama for this. Oh well, I guess you just don't understand what it means to be held accountable for your actions and your decisions. YOu musta been raised by liberals.
Many many people are accountable for their actions and still would like so see their money go into social programmes. I think you forget about that group of people.
You only ever talk about the "accountable people"(Cons) like you. Or "scroungers"(Libs) basically everyone else. Like there is only two groups of ppl in America.

What about the "accountable" people who work hard, want and choose to give a small portion of their earning to help ppl get a leg up or pay into social programmes for the good of their country as a whole? What "box" do they fit in? Considering they worked hard to earn their money. Are they still a Lib. Or are they some kind of hybrid?
Liberals do not want to give a small amount of their income to shit. Hell I do that in charity and taxes. For liberals, they want it all. They do not believe in charity over wealth redistribution. They want even more than what should be expected with no accountability attached to it. They want the govt. to take responsibility away from from the people.

Sorry if you do not like that "label" but it is true and well deserved. Unfortunately Nobama will prove it in spades.
JahManRed
wank
+646|6931|IRELAND

I think your views are at one extreme end and you assume anyone who is different is at the opposite end. You take no account of the people in the middle. Here the middle is the majority. In the states the middle ground ppl are in the minority, it seams.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA

JahManRed wrote:

I think your views are at one extreme end and you assume anyone who is different is at the opposite end. You take no account of the people in the middle. Here the middle is the majority. In the states the middle ground ppl are in the minority, it seams.
The "middle" are not liberals, they are center.  Hence the term right center and left, when dealing with political views.
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7113|Nårvei

lowing wrote:

Liberals do not want to give a small amount of their income to shit.
Who does want to give their money to shit, define shit please ...

lowing wrote:

Hell I do that in charity and taxes. For liberals, they want it all.
You do what in charity and taxes? ... give money to shit?

lowing wrote:

They do not believe in charity over wealth redistribution.
Liberals believe in both charity and wealth distribution, or charity through wealth distribution if you like ...

lowing wrote:

They want even more than what should be expected with no accountability attached to it.
Elaborate please because that sentence makes no sense ...

lowing wrote:

They want the govt. to take responsibility away from from the people.
No we don't, that's just ignorant ...

lowing wrote:

Sorry if you do not like that "label" but it is true and well deserved. Unfortunately Nobama will prove it in spades.
No it's not true and you just proved again that you don't know what you are talking about ... so much hatred for something you do not understand and/or know nothing about is just disturbing tbh ...

lowing wrote:

The "middle" are not liberals, they are center.  Hence the term right center and left, when dealing with political views.
So if the liberals are not in the middle and by your last sentence they are neither on the right nor the left ... where are they lowing?
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6885|SE London

Varegg wrote:

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:


From where do you get the idea that liberals aren't accountable for their actions?
Ummmmmmmm, ACLU lawyers screaming about criminal rights over victims rights. frivilous lawsuits, never accepting blame for their demise, it is always someone else's fault. wealth envy, supports redistribution of someone else' s money to them. KATRINA!! Just little things like that
And where is the documentation to back up this statement, is there records showing these claims?

You throw the phrase liberals around in a very ignorant way lowing ...
Lowing makes up his own definitions for words....
destruktion_6143
Was ist Loos?
+154|6930|Canada

Bertster7 wrote:

Varegg wrote:

lowing wrote:


Ummmmmmmm, ACLU lawyers screaming about criminal rights over victims rights. frivilous lawsuits, never accepting blame for their demise, it is always someone else's fault. wealth envy, supports redistribution of someone else' s money to them. KATRINA!! Just little things like that
And where is the documentation to back up this statement, is there records showing these claims?

You throw the phrase liberals around in a very ignorant way lowing ...
Lowing makes up his own definitions for words....
thats why we <3 lowing

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard