Last edited by CameronPoe (2009-01-30 05:41:02)
Last edited by Braddock (2009-01-30 07:04:07)
Carpet bombing can be expensive too... you should have just left them alone to play with their fictional WMD's.Lotta_Drool wrote:
We should have carpet bombed them instead of bankrupting our nation. A fitting tribute to Bush and his nation building.
Actually carpet bombing is an inexpensive way to use up old munitions without needing to pay someone to destroy them. The US had millions of bombs after the first Gulf war that never got used and were aging.Braddock wrote:
Carpet bombing can be expensive too... you should have just left them alone to play with their fictional WMD's.Lotta_Drool wrote:
We should have carpet bombed them instead of bankrupting our nation. A fitting tribute to Bush and his nation building.
Saddam was a cool dude I'll admit and one bonus of the Iraq war is that the Saddam posters on my wall have become collector's items but I'm afraid no one cares what armchair generals who pretend to be Vietnam vets think about global security either.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Actually carpet bombing is an inexpensive way to use up old munitions without needing to pay someone to destroy them. The US had millions of bombs after the first Gulf war that never got used and were aging.Braddock wrote:
Carpet bombing can be expensive too... you should have just left them alone to play with their fictional WMD's.Lotta_Drool wrote:
We should have carpet bombed them instead of bankrupting our nation. A fitting tribute to Bush and his nation building.
I know Sadam and his government is a big hero of yours, but trust me when I say that nobody cares what the Irish think when it comes to global security.
Unlike you, my government has a military and is not afraid to use it for political gain which would imply that they care what I think which has a direct impact on places all over the globe.Braddock wrote:
Saddam was a cool dude I'll admit and one bonus of the Iraq war is that the Saddam posters on my wall have become collector's items but I'm afraid no one cares what armchair generals who pretend to be Vietnam vets think about global security either.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Actually carpet bombing is an inexpensive way to use up old munitions without needing to pay someone to destroy them. The US had millions of bombs after the first Gulf war that never got used and were aging.Braddock wrote:
Carpet bombing can be expensive too... you should have just left them alone to play with their fictional WMD's.
I know Sadam and his government is a big hero of yours, but trust me when I say that nobody cares what the Irish think when it comes to global security.
I don't think anyone does Lotta... your mother told me just last night that even she didn't care!Lotta_Drool wrote:
Unlike you, my government has a military and is not afraid to use it for political gain which would imply that they care what I think which has a direct impact on places all over the globe.Braddock wrote:
Saddam was a cool dude I'll admit and one bonus of the Iraq war is that the Saddam posters on my wall have become collector's items but I'm afraid no one cares what armchair generals who pretend to be Vietnam vets think about global security either.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Actually carpet bombing is an inexpensive way to use up old munitions without needing to pay someone to destroy them. The US had millions of bombs after the first Gulf war that never got used and were aging.
I know Sadam and his government is a big hero of yours, but trust me when I say that nobody cares what the Irish think when it comes to global security.
meh, who am I kidding, they don't care what I think.
Strange, "muh-muh-muh-slurp", is all I hear your mother say.Braddock wrote:
I don't think anyone does Lotta... your mother told me just last night that even she didn't care!Lotta_Drool wrote:
Unlike you, my government has a military and is not afraid to use it for political gain which would imply that they care what I think which has a direct impact on places all over the globe.Braddock wrote:
Saddam was a cool dude I'll admit and one bonus of the Iraq war is that the Saddam posters on my wall have become collector's items but I'm afraid no one cares what armchair generals who pretend to be Vietnam vets think about global security either.
meh, who am I kidding, they don't care what I think.
Oh yeah... I went there!
Yo mama so fat... etc. etc.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Strange, "muh-muh-muh-slurp", is all I hear your mother say.Braddock wrote:
I don't think anyone does Lotta... your mother told me just last night that even she didn't care!Lotta_Drool wrote:
Unlike you, my government has a military and is not afraid to use it for political gain which would imply that they care what I think which has a direct impact on places all over the globe.
meh, who am I kidding, they don't care what I think.
Oh yeah... I went there!
Like a form of extreme finger painting.M.O.A.B wrote:
Suicide bombing's an art?
And without paint... the red is supplied from alternative sources.M.O.A.B wrote:
Without the fingers.
To be fair the article is on cnn so although the statue is a pretty awful symbol of what they think is right still think of how bias cnn is in presenting 'the shoe'Locoloki wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/01/29/iraq.shoe.monument/index.html
If you thought about donating money to orphanages in a war sticken Iraq, you're wasting your time.
I think the shoe is a great symbol for the war that has torn that country to bits and the legacy of the Bush era. Like it or not that show throwing journalist will be in the history books as the full stop (or 'period' to you Americans out there!) to the story of George's Iraqi adventure.Aliiiice wrote:
To be fair the article is on cnn so although the statue is a pretty awful symbol of what they think is right still think of how bias cnn is in presenting 'the shoe'Locoloki wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/01/29/iraq.shoe.monument/index.html
If you thought about donating money to orphanages in a war sticken Iraq, you're wasting your time.
I'm sure the historical rememberence of 'the shoe throwing' is a far better symbol of strength and beliefs of a country than a statue of a shoe. Like i said before, CNN will be bias thinking this statue means the country is 'raising terrorists'. I guess that maybe the statue isn't best placed among children orphaned by the war?Braddock wrote:
I think the shoe is a great symbol for the war that has torn that country to bits and the legacy of the Bush era. Like it or not that show throwing journalist will be in the history books as the full stop (or 'period' to you Americans out there!) to the story of George's Iraqi adventure.Aliiiice wrote:
To be fair the article is on cnn so although the statue is a pretty awful symbol of what they think is right still think of how bias cnn is in presenting 'the shoe'Locoloki wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/01/29/iraq.shoe.monument/index.html
If you thought about donating money to orphanages in a war sticken Iraq, you're wasting your time.
Terrorism has nothing to do with this, it would only be Western ignorance that would associate the symbol of a shoe as portrayed by an artist (a strong symbol in Middle Eastern culture and a culturally relevant symbol given the current climate) with young orphans having a propensity towards suicide bombing in the future.Aliiiice wrote:
I'm sure the historical rememberence of 'the shoe throwing' is a far better symbol of strength and beliefs of a country than a statue of a shoe. Like i said before, CNN will be bias thinking this statue means the country is 'raising terrorists'. I guess that maybe the statue isn't best placed among children orphaned by the war?Braddock wrote:
I think the shoe is a great symbol for the war that has torn that country to bits and the legacy of the Bush era. Like it or not that show throwing journalist will be in the history books as the full stop (or 'period' to you Americans out there!) to the story of George's Iraqi adventure.Aliiiice wrote:
To be fair the article is on cnn so although the statue is a pretty awful symbol of what they think is right still think of how bias cnn is in presenting 'the shoe'