The Bf2s flickr group

2013-01-22 09:27:06

#1626

-Whiteroom-: Pineapplewhat; +572|6903|BC, Canada

How do you like the Tamron?

I was reading a review comparing the Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM and the Tamron 18-270MM F/3.5-6.3 Di-II VC PZD. The Review suggested that the Sigma was the better option, but something is telling me getting really good quality out of a lens with that range is to much to hope for. Maybe a couple of lenses to cover that range.

Last edited by -Whiteroom- (2013-01-22 09:27:25)

2013-01-22 09:33:33

#1627

Kimmmmmmmmmmmm: ©; +1,811|6241

mebbe look on dpreview to compare those mega zooms
right now with the d7000 i carry my nikon 50 1.4 and 24-120 f/4. pl, nd filters.
i would like to have a 70-200 2.8 but it looks inconvenient

2013-01-22 09:41:19

#1628

-Whiteroom-: Pineapplewhat; +572|6903|BC, Canada

Inconvenient? How so?

2013-01-22 09:42:47

#1629

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

<3 70-300.

2013-01-22 09:45:53

#1630

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

-Whiteroom- wrote:
Inconvenient? How so?

Size i suppose

2013-01-22 09:54:20

#1631

-Whiteroom-: Pineapplewhat; +572|6903|BC, Canada

My 75-300 is only about an inch and a half longer than my 18-55. But that one may be less bulky than most. I don't currently use a lens hood though.

2013-01-22 10:02:08

#1632

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

The lens is pretty small compared to 70-300

2013-01-22 10:20:38

#1633

-Whiteroom-: Pineapplewhat; +572|6903|BC, Canada

RTHKI wrote:
The lens is pretty small compared to 70-300

Guess it is, the 18-55 has a fader filter on it, so it's a bit longer than normal.

https://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g294/twigmar/55vs300_zps488017f0.jpg

2013-01-22 10:35:24

#1634

Ultrafunkula: Hector: Ding, ding, ding, ding...; +1,975|6718|6 6 4 oh, I forget

-Whiteroom- wrote:
How do you like the Tamron?

It was on a special offer so I bought it. Needed a long tube for general outdoor shooting. I got a few nice pics of some kitesurfing at the canary isles last winter. Added 4 pics on flickr that I took with it.

2013-01-22 10:36:07

#1635

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

70-200 2.8 looks a lot bigger judging by pics. also dat money D:

2013-01-22 10:41:05

#1636

-Whiteroom-: Pineapplewhat; +572|6903|BC, Canada

RTHKI wrote:
70-200 2.8 looks a lot bigger judging by pics. also dat money D:

this one?

2013-01-22 10:44:03

#1637

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

it costs more than all my gear

2013-01-22 10:47:21

#1638

-Whiteroom-: Pineapplewhat; +572|6903|BC, Canada

good lenses hurt me when I see the price.

2013-01-22 10:52:34

#1639

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

ive sworn off upgrading anything for years

2013-01-22 10:53:58

#1640

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

ive been bad. i have 300 or so photos to go through and delete/upload/photoshop

2013-01-22 10:55:19

#1641

Ultrafunkula: Hector: Ding, ding, ding, ding...; +1,975|6718|6 6 4 oh, I forget

My 70-200 cost 600€ as used. Works as a charm.

2013-01-22 10:55:53

#1642

-Whiteroom-: Pineapplewhat; +572|6903|BC, Canada

You gotta stay on top of that and be ruthless, otherwise you won't even want to touch it.

2013-01-22 10:59:00

#1643

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

i know. first time i shot motorsports i took 1800 or so pics.

2013-01-22 11:03:52

#1644

-Whiteroom-: Pineapplewhat; +572|6903|BC, Canada

Holy fuck, thats a nightmare to sort through. I try to delete as I go if I'm taking lots.

2013-01-22 11:06:24

#1645

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

heh. It was my first time so I wasnt sure the best settings and was my first time panning. Cars were pretty much constantly going by so I was constantly taking pics. Only time I had to delete was in between races.
some lots were so bad i could delete groups of 50 at a time xD

Last edited by RTHKI (2013-01-22 11:09:05)

2013-01-22 12:21:34

#1646

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6742

-Whiteroom- wrote:
RTHKI wrote:
70-200 2.8 looks a lot bigger judging by pics. also dat money D:
this one?

i have that lens. i like it alot.

most of my gear;

Last edited by 13urnzz (2013-01-22 12:31:14)

2013-01-22 12:55:19

#1647

-Whiteroom-: Pineapplewhat; +572|6903|BC, Canada

How is the 18-200? or the 28-135?

Last edited by -Whiteroom- (2013-01-22 12:56:53)

2013-01-22 13:25:53

#1648

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6982|Cinncinatti

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/6644/IMG_3514.png

2013-01-22 13:26:14

#1649

-Whiteroom-: Pineapplewhat; +572|6903|BC, Canada

you like this

2013-01-22 17:02:26

#1650

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6742

nice, rthinky

the 28-135 is the kit lens for the 7D. on a crop sensor, it was too long to be a wide angle and not long enough to be a telephoto. i haven't tried it FF yet, it may redeem itself.

the 18-200 is a great walk-around lens. it's what my wife uses on vacation. it's soft on both ends, but overall has done well.

the lens i'll miss the most is the 17-85. i may keep it on the 7D . . .

BF2S Forums The Bf2s flickr group

-Whiteroom- wrote:

RTHKI wrote:

-Whiteroom- wrote:

RTHKI wrote:

-Whiteroom- wrote:

RTHKI wrote:

Board footer