Shopped as in post processed? I'm sure to some degree..Sup wrote:
Amazing. But were the photos shopped?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Shopped as in post processed? I'm sure to some degree..Sup wrote:
Amazing. But were the photos shopped?
I don't know exactly how it's done, and I can't find any examples, but it produces this effect in the sky:mcminty wrote:
Wut. Then the foreground would blur... Or is this for like.. Photos of the sky only (in which case you'd use a telescope adaptor? :p) I have seen something like that used for moving star timelapses. Shouldn't be hard to find an example on Vimeo.com (I'd post one but this is from my phone lol).Finray wrote:
Wow, that first picture is amazing.
Have you seen those things that turn your camera the same speed as the Earth turns, so you can do extra-long exposures without the streaking happening?
But yeah, first pic is amazing. Also quite like second one.
CammRobb wrote:
I might get a few strange looks for messaging dick nipples
Last edited by CammRobb (2010-01-16 09:34:10)
very niceburnzz wrote:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4015/428 … 802e4d.jpg
You're a soul singer?Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
http://www.weshotjr.com/ yay my pic is in a blog with no credit http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_x8wUUGUCKok/S … /colab.jpg
Last edited by Kimmmmmmmmmmmm (2010-01-25 16:41:37)
Last edited by Kimmmmmmmmmmmm (2010-01-31 19:40:47)