Because the lowest form of animal they eat is the cat.uevjHEYFFQ wrote:
Well I have A Modest Proposal for this whole world recession issue. Why don't we all just sell our children as food for the Chinese?
(ask a stupid question...)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78bee/78beeb000139f0d5d6c3caf1415cd42d5fac00dc" alt="https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png"
Because the lowest form of animal they eat is the cat.uevjHEYFFQ wrote:
Well I have A Modest Proposal for this whole world recession issue. Why don't we all just sell our children as food for the Chinese?
O Reaper. I thought you would get the joke. Well maybe only the Irish will.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Because the lowest form of animal they eat is the cat.uevjHEYFFQ wrote:
Well I have A Modest Proposal for this whole world recession issue. Why don't we all just sell our children as food for the Chinese?
(ask a stupid question...)
Turquoise wrote:
PureFodder wrote:
Isn't this about contraception, not abortion.
I don't know if that was a direct response to Fodder, but contraception is leagues preferable to abortion if abstinence cannot be attained or culturally-induced.ATG wrote:
That's a double negative.
I'm pro-choice, and even I agree with that.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Turquoise wrote:
PureFodder wrote:
Isn't this about contraception, not abortion.I don't know if that was a direct response to Fodder, but contraception is leagues preferable to abortion if abstinence cannot be attained or culturally-induced.ATG wrote:
That's a double negative.
Condoms/etc. > bloody fetus on a stainless-steel tray.
Trust me... Pelosi would never win. It would be about as likely as Rush Limbaugh winning the presidency.SgtHeihn wrote:
Nancy Pelosi is a stupid fucking bitch that only a city like San Francisco would be proud of. She is the face of everything that is wrong with the Congress. I would take Hilary before I would ever take Pelosi. Hell if she ever ran for President and(shudder) won, I would be on the first flight outta the country.
/end rant.
Hillary is way more electable than Pelosi. Granted, I don't think I'd vote for her, unless the Republicans ran someone like Palin.Stingray24 wrote:
You're right, ugly old battleaxes would never get anywhere near the presidency. *cough* Hillary *cough*
There's 1 illegal for every 15 Californias...Pug wrote:
Wow. Irony.
Perhaps the Senator from California will consider deporting illegals to reduce the population instead...
I don't think the state should force people to use contraceptives, but... I don't think we should have to fully pay for their kids either. Child tax credits should be limited to 2 per family, for example.topthrill05 wrote:
Considering that the government is responsible for paying for your kid if you can't, then why can't the government say no you can't have one or in this case wrap it the fuck up?
It seems many of you want it both ways, really some people in the the city breed like its their day job, it's gotta fucking stop.
Rush would have a better chance. He has a much larger following..Turquoise wrote:
Trust me... Pelosi would never win. It would be about as likely as Rush Limbaugh winning the presidency.SgtHeihn wrote:
Nancy Pelosi is a stupid fucking bitch that only a city like San Francisco would be proud of. She is the face of everything that is wrong with the Congress. I would take Hilary before I would ever take Pelosi. Hell if she ever ran for President and(shudder) won, I would be on the first flight outta the country.
/end rant.
Babies don't vote. But families that are 1st-2nd gen (from illegals) do...and they vote democrat.CC-Marley wrote:
That is a good idea. Even though she is in the House.Pug wrote:
Wow. Irony.
Perhaps the Senator from California will consider deporting illegals to reduce the population instead...
But babies do vote...for Democrats. Twice.FEOS wrote:
Babies don't vote. But families that are 1st-2nd gen (from illegals) do...and they vote democrat.CC-Marley wrote:
That is a good idea. Even though she is in the House.Pug wrote:
Wow. Irony.
Perhaps the Senator from California will consider deporting illegals to reduce the population instead...
That's really depressing.Kmarion wrote:
Rush would have a better chance. He has a much larger following..Turquoise wrote:
Trust me... Pelosi would never win. It would be about as likely as Rush Limbaugh winning the presidency.SgtHeihn wrote:
Nancy Pelosi is a stupid fucking bitch that only a city like San Francisco would be proud of. She is the face of everything that is wrong with the Congress. I would take Hilary before I would ever take Pelosi. Hell if she ever ran for President and(shudder) won, I would be on the first flight outta the country.
/end rant.
/operation chaos
Manufacturing industries also spend lots of money making sure that their interests are looked after (ie. cheap labourers). Neither the Dems or Reps have any interest at all in removing vast numbers of cheap labourers from the country.FEOS wrote:
Babies don't vote. But families that are 1st-2nd gen (from illegals) do...and they vote democrat.CC-Marley wrote:
That is a good idea. Even though she is in the House.Pug wrote:
Wow. Irony.
Perhaps the Senator from California will consider deporting illegals to reduce the population instead...
I didn't say all, but even the ones that are not still forget whose money they are borrowing from. I am sure if they are nice enough people they would be able to seek help. But the rest of them that are assholes should learn to pick up their feet and show humility.Spark wrote:
And then you find that the birth rate is going through the floor because of all the "hard choices" being made.
Being an asshole doesn't mean everyone else is an asshole
Last edited by Warhammer (2009-01-27 10:30:31)
Penalizing marriage is probably not going to reduce pregnancies. At worst, it'll generate more single mothers and be construed as an attack on traditional society.Pug wrote:
After further thought, this is ridiculous in that instead of adding an expense to the budget, and if the intent was to reduce pregnancies...
....how about discontinuing the child tax credit, decreasing the dependent deduction, and increasing the marriage tax penalty instead?
Anyway you look at it, it's not an economic "stimulus".
Spark wrote:
And then you find that the birth rate is going through the floor because of all the "hard choices" being made.
Being an asshole doesn't mean everyone else is an asshole
Spark wrote:
Being an asshole doesn't mean everyone else is an asshole
Spark wrote:
Being an asshole...
Spark wrote:
asshole
Nah. Those babies are going to be out of work too.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
But babies do vote...for Democrats. Twice.