tehmoogles
Don't touch the pom-pom!
+7|6949
And the Aussies are STILL like "WTF mate?"
tehmoogles
Don't touch the pom-pom!
+7|6949
I'm sure I saw something about developing the most powerful nuke. And what would be the point in blanketting the world several times over? They'd kill themselves and probably make it impossible for human life to exist anywhere for thousands of years, making you lose.

Think. The US forces are spread out all over the MEast. A coalition of European and Russian forces could easily defeat the US navy and Air Force.

And how does this guy assume that the US has the best pilots etc? They have the most, you imbecile, not the best. As I've said, Europe has the BEST firearms manufacturers and probably the best vehicle manufacturers. Ever heard of the Daisy-Cutter? Alternative to Nukes, much less fallout.
Orion5413
Member
+4|6926|Irving Tx
I might be wrong but does china have a navy? If they did then why have they not invaded tiwan? I am sure they have some ships and etc but a real navy?Just asking?
RoyWereForUniMare
Member
+0|7020|Holland/Netherlands

Orion5413 wrote:

I might be wrong but does china have a navy? If they did then why have they not invaded tiwan? I am sure they have some ships and etc but a real navy?Just asking?
Nooo!!, they have chop sticks!
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|7076

Sgt. Sergio Bennet 3rd wrote:

Reality check guys,


I hope next elections you vote for somebody with brains and not Bush again...
I hope next elections you vote for somebody with brains and not Bush again

Here's a real sense of reality  " not Bush again " You have to love it !
RoyWereForUniMare
Member
+0|7020|Holland/Netherlands

Horseman 77 wrote:

Here's a real sense of reality  " not Bush again " You have to love it !
I really wonder what will happen if they re-elect Bush... I think it will be a fatal dessicion..
Sluggit
Member
+3|6957|Sweden
The Missile gap is still too great. They need another few let’s say 3-4 years before they successfully can mount an attack on Taiwan and “knock out” their prime defensive assets such as costal fortresses, air bases and vital infrastructure such as power plants telecom and more!

They will only get one chance to setup that vital bridge head if that’s now what’s in the head of Chinese supreme commander.
Adam5286
Member
+0|6915|CapeCod, MA USA
Well don’t worry about it he cant serve more than two terms, but knowing bush he will probably make sum law so that he can . Tehmoogles   read what I said before, how are they going to invade the U.S.    like physically.   In ships like troy    they will get blown out of the water.   Through Canada and mexico??  How?   

Because I know u wont go back and look this is what I said before

Now back to the subject at hand, how would the invading armies even get on to American soil?  They wouldn’t be able to come across on ships. They would be blown to shit by American Aircraft.  I doubt the invading countries would have the carrier support to counter the American air force.  And being in a defensive position it’s easier to have air superiority, which ultimately wins wars (wars like this hypothetical one, not like Viet Nam, because I know some one was going to bring that up) The invading forces would have to try to enter threw Canada and maybe even Mexico if they wanted, we all know that boarder is easily crossed…. This is assuming the amphibious invasion is not possible.  Even then the invading forces would get bombed to shit while on the ground because they wouldn’t have air superiority.    So I’m thinking the only way it would be possible is if Pres. Bush gets even stupider and starts invading half of the world.  Then America’s troops will be even more spread out, and stretched thin that a massive invasion of USA could…maybe work.   But even then the invading forces wouldn’t win because it would be just like Iraq.  Militias would be all over the place, every gang banger to local hick would be shooting up the occupying forces with their weapons.    So I guess what I’m saying is, I defiantly don’t Europe and Russia could do it, and I don’t really know about china
Lt.Maverick|Lw|
youve now just been Pwned by the Mavster
+-1|6963
U can say the us has all this fire power...but common sense is very useful...in the gulf wars...how many times did the us kill friendlies,also rember uk has the sas and sbs and russia have spetzna...why send in a whole fleet when u can infiltrate destroy communication etc from the inside and then russia and european forces can flood in and kick ass
Adam5286
Member
+0|6915|CapeCod, MA USA
Well the US has 10,656 nukes  the UK has 200    you claim the UK has the most powerful but does that compensate for the 10456 ??           it doesn’t really matter though  nuclear war is pretty much then end of civilization.
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|7076

RoyWereForUniMare wrote:

bEAv3D wrote:

Sgt. Sergio Bennet 3rd wrote:

I hope next elections you vote for somebody with brains and not Bush again...
Like who? Hillary?  That would be a smart one....
That jerk is a blight on our Great state.

Clinton should be president again...
Yea he could mastubate in The Oval Office !

That put the Fear of God into our Enemys after the

WTC 93 attacks
Tanzia Embassie
Kenya Embassie
US Marine Barracks in Sudia Arabia
Pan Am flight 800
Somalia
The Destroyer USS Cole



Just a thought. Can you Imagine being cuaght where you work Masturbating on Company property on Company Time or with a willing ( Chubbette monica ) or Unwilling ( Catherine Willy ) Junior Employee,
and at that not even having the balls to see it through and shoot your load? lol Do you think you would keep your Job at any Company no less a Goverment Agency? Would you want to? I would split and start a New Identity somewhere else.

No wonder they thought they could get Away with 911

You didn't see Osama sending clinton peace feelers.. I wonder why ?
The_Mob_Returns
Member
+72|6961|Indianapolis, IN
Why dont we take the hypothetical question a little further.  Let us bring every country's army back their homeland and take Nukes out of the picture.  Then, who would win?
Cpt.Crambone
Member
+4|6903|Chi-town, USA

RoyWereForUniMare wrote:

Horseman 77 wrote:

Here's a real sense of reality  " not Bush again " You have to love it !
I really wonder what will happen if they re-elect Bush... I think it will be a fatal dessicion..
Don't worry my little Euro-kiddies.  There's a 2 term limit.  He's done in '08.  Then we can put the Terminator in office.  Or better yet, R. Lee Ermie.  Ooo Rah!
RoyWereForUniMare
Member
+0|7020|Holland/Netherlands

Horseman 77 wrote:

Yea he could mastubate in The Oval Office !

That put the Fear of God into our Enemys after the

WTC 93 attacks
Tanzia Embassie
Kenya Embassie
US Marine Barracks in Sudia Arabia
Pan Am flight 800
Somalia
The Destroyer USS Cole



Just a thought. Can you Imagine being cuaght where you work Masturbating on Company property on Company Time or with a willing ( Chubbette monica ) or Unwilling ( Catherine Willy ) Junior Employee,
and at that not even having the balls to see it through and shoot your load? lol Do you think you would keep your Job at any Company no less a Goverment Agency? Would you want to? I would split and start a New Identity somewhere else.

No wonder they thought they could get Away with 911

You didn't see Osama sending clinton peace feelers.. I wonder why ?
Its a crying shame that your private life isn't private when you're a celeb or anyone important>.<.
bEAv3D
Member
+24|6933|Fayettenam, NC USA

Cpt.Crambone wrote:

Or better yet, R. Lee Ermie.  Ooo Rah!
Now there's a guy I would definitely vote for, seriously.

Last edited by bEAv3D (2006-01-28 13:10:33)

MrPlatinum
Member
+0|6903
Just a thought but if anyone tries to invade through mexico or canada don't you think that the US has enough satellites in space to see troops moblizing through those countries?
RoyWereForUniMare
Member
+0|7020|Holland/Netherlands

Cpt.Crambone wrote:

RoyWereForUniMare wrote:

Horseman 77 wrote:

Here's a real sense of reality  " not Bush again " You have to love it !
I really wonder what will happen if they re-elect Bush... I think it will be a fatal dessicion..
Don't worry my little Euro-kiddies.  There's a 2 term limit.  He's done in '08.  Then we can put the Terminator in office.  Or better yet, R. Lee Ermie.  Ooo Rah!
Hehehe, little Euro-kiddies.. I actually am amused by that ^^ though I'm no kid anymore (age wise, mentally I will never lose the child in me) anyway, who would actually be good to be pres. Al Gore? or whatever his name was?
FireTiger
Member
+0|7008
Europe Can't attack without a stronger country, why? Because it's a dead land. No (few) resources (look at our oil prices !). We need a stronger country to survive. We live from export, not import generally.
Coutries that grow stronger and stronger in the world are China and the middle east (all those oil coutries). when war breaks out it's always about the oil. It's the main resource to keep all those machinery working. (That's why WW2 endend mostly, Germany ran out of oil).

I can't predict when their will be a war in the future. I only know, that when great nations nowadays attack, the after shocks will be disasterous. WE CAN DESTROY THE WORLD.

Peace, a word everybody (?) dreams of but never will be there.
We have been fighting each other since the stone ages, I don't believe in world peace.

BTW I'm Belgian

Last edited by FireTiger (2006-01-28 13:15:45)

Adam5286
Member
+0|6915|CapeCod, MA USA
MrPlatinum,   yeah i was being sarcastic about it.    Even if they tried they would be bombed to shit by the US airforce because they wouldnt have airsuperiority to protect the ground troops
BurlySmurf
Member
+1|6993|Nellis AFB

Sgt. Sergio Bennet 3rd wrote:

Nukes?, yeah, the US has a lot of Nukes but the rest of the world too, and they need to send only three nukes:
- one nuke to new york (financial capital of the world)
- one nuke to washington (capital)
- one big nuke to NORAD (main military intelligence).
without these 3 the US will go down fast.

This is a lose lose situation for the US.
None of those locations have any real strategic value other than NORAD and maybe Washington. All the leaders would have been evacuated from Washington anyway. Also none of those locations affect the United States nuclear capablity. One that is very.. very.. strong.
chuckle_hound
Member
+32|6906|Edinburgh, Scotland

the_heart_attack wrote:

dont forget america has friends.
Hmm, I seem to remember that beating people up doesn't make them your friends and that money doesn't buy friendship.


I'm tired of all the younger governments (America, China, Middle East) causing all this bother in the world.  Take a lesson from Europe, we've finished all the empire building and bullying.  It's a far better idea to sort out the problems in your own country without starting wars over ideology.
RoyWereForUniMare
Member
+0|7020|Holland/Netherlands

<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:

Pretty sure even if europe attacked the U.S, Canada would ally with the Americans.
No, they would just join the Dutch to party.
As far as I know most Canadians (that I know personally) don't want to have to do much with America at all, they just want to be left alone and in peace.
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|6955
US kicks ass... and besides, we get along with most of Europe... especially Britain... what a dumb post... hypothetical or not... pfffft...    CB
Love is the answer
sapoisk
Member
+0|6912
now i havnt read all posts on 2 side but i see your all missing another big thing about EU vs US..
if it wasnt to MANY small countries in EU (sweeden forex) the US wouldnt have such a hightech and eccuiped army as they do today.. most tech. are developed in countries in EU.. so without us the the US would not get that much high tech weapons and the US tech. would be outdated in a matter of 1½-2 years..

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard