BF2S Forums Young Adolph Hitler removed from home

white trash

SealXo wrote:

white trash

Well they just got what they wanted, another 10 minutes of fame. GG

I swear I've seen those people and their little "Adolph Hitler" before.

Zefar wrote:

um They didn't take the kid because of the name but how they raised the kid. The state can remove a kid due to his name alone. So there was something else that got the kid taken.


"""A spokeswoman for the state Division of Youth and Family Services, Kate Bernyk, said she would not comment on any specific case, but she said the state would not remove children from a home simply because of their names."""

Wouldn't be suprised if the state cooks up some bullshit reason to remove the kids. It's their child they made it they can name it whatever they like. When you start doing things like this (punishing people for their views and thoughts using obscure laws) things could go pretty badly in the long run.

Zefar wrote:

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Wouldn't be surprised if the state cooks up some bullshit reason to remove the kids. It's their child they made it they can name it whatever they like. When you start doing things like this (punishing people for their views and thoughts using obscure laws) things could go pretty badly in the long run.

Yea they probably didn't thought any bad thoughts when they named their kid after the biggest nazi leader in the world and themselves have lots of nazi symbols all over the house. Yea it's probably just because of the name.

But seriously, they said it wasn't the name that was the problem and that they could taken the kid away for that. If they go to court the parents will win.

I never said they didn't have bad thoughts. Though I really don't believe there is a clear good and bad to anything. Their views are there own and don't affect me or anyone else. Further more they could be full blown Nazi's who role play in their house using Nazi uniforms and equipment. I really don't care.

What I said was that they are probably going to cite some obscure law then twist it to some way they could remove these children from the home. This wouldn't be happening or would have gained any attention if it wasn't for the child's name.

But your Swedish so I'm sure you probably have some sort of predisposition towards Nazi's or anything remotely related to them.   <-   Look I can do that to

Gawwad wrote:

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Zefar wrote:

Yea they probably didn't thought any bad thoughts when they named their kid after the biggest nazi leader in the world and themselves have lots of nazi symbols all over the house. Yea it's probably just because of the name.

But seriously, they said it wasn't the name that was the problem and that they could taken the kid away for that. If they go to court the parents will win.

I never said they didn't have bad thoughts. Though I really don't believe there is a clear good and bad to anything. Their views are there own and don't affect me or anyone else. Further more they could be full blown Nazi's who role play in their house using Nazi uniforms and equipment. I really don't care.

What I said was that they are probably going to cite some obscure law then twist it to some way they could remove these children from the home. This wouldn't be happening or would have gained any attention if it wasn't for the child's name.

But your Swedish so I'm sure you probably have some sort of predisposition towards Nazi's or anything remotely related to them.   <-   Look I can do that to

WTF? You're living in another world man...

No I'm living in New Jersey. Maybe the Swedish remark was over the line but I'm a fan of the Schlafly Reversal.

Anyway most of my points I'm still standing by. I really don't care the name of their children or their world views. It still seems like they are going after them because of their views.

Stingray24 wrote:

I would like to know why the kids were removed.  As distasteful as their views are, the parents don't deserve to lose their kids to the government simply because of their opinions.

child abuse.  what they did is abuse.

usmarine wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

I would like to know why the kids were removed.  As distasteful as their views are, the parents don't deserve to lose their kids to the government simply because of their opinions.

child abuse.  what they did is abuse.

We may hate the man they named their child after, but that doesn't equal child abuse.

usmarine wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

I would like to know why the kids were removed.  As distasteful as their views are, the parents don't deserve to lose their kids to the government simply because of their opinions.

child abuse.  what they did is abuse.

Exactly. As much as I'm against hitting children, this kind IMO is much worse abuse.

Stingray24 wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

I would like to know why the kids were removed.  As distasteful as their views are, the parents don't deserve to lose their kids to the government simply because of their opinions.

child abuse.  what they did is abuse.

We may hate the man they named their child after, but that doesn't equal child abuse.

Are you serious? Do you think for one second what kind of parents would name their children like that?

Last edited by Gawwad (2009-01-15 16:19:14)

12/f/taiwan wrote:

My sympathy towards the kid. Being brought into a world of misery where he will get harassed throughout all his school years and then most likely have the hardest time attempting to find a job.

Just hope they change their names.
Good thing they acted when they are still relatively young.

Gawwad wrote:

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Gawwad wrote:

WTF? You're living in another world man...

No I'm living in New Jersey. Maybe the Swedish remark was over the line but I'm a fan of the Schlafly Reversal.

Anyway most of my points I'm still standing by. I really don't care the name of their children or their world views. It still seems like they are going after them because of their views.

You sure like to look at the world in black and white.
Do you honestly think anything good would have come of those children had they not been taken from their parents?

I honestly do not know what the hell you meant with that 'Swedish remark' either.

But your Swedish so I'm sure you probably have some sort of predisposition towards Nazi's or anything remotely related to them.

That was the swedish remark. It was a bad attempt to make it seem he's auto biased.

Anyway if they live and grow up in a financially stable household with loving parents I don't see how that could be worse then growing up in the foster care system.