AutralianChainsaw seems to be attempting to explain and justify his perhaps poorly thought out views instead of just name calling.
That is perhaps why he hasn't been banned again.
That is perhaps why he hasn't been banned again.
i don't really think jord and mandarin are having you killed lol.AutralianChainsaw wrote:
It's ironic to see how two of the biggest supporter of the Iraq war (Jord and usmarine), a war that was supposedly fought for the spreading of democracy and freedom of speech, are the two guy who want to shut me up by having me banned.
Good job guys, Saddam would be proud of you.. He did the same you know, banning and/or killing the opposition.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
I don't even support the Iraq war. No wonder I despise you are your type. Stop trolling and putting shit in my mouth that I don't even say.AutralianChainsaw wrote:
It's ironic to see how two of the biggest supporter of the Iraq war (Jord and usmarine), a war that was supposedly fought for the spreading of democracy and freedom of speech, are the two guy who want to shut me up by having me banned.
Good job guys, Saddam would be proud of you.. He did the same you know, banning and/or killing the opposition.
Not only that but I have never even said the Iraq war was "For freedom of speech". You need to learn comprehension or something, fucking wow.
And he stated he would not close this thread and would allow a discussion. Don't like it? Get the fuck out then.mafia996630 wrote:
Wow, why are people still trying to get him banned even after FM clearly stated the following on page two:
"After reading the most recent 20% of his posts going back 2 months the worst he has done is call people simpletons and call people fat. Considering he was being called a Nazi by you and others and that I would say being called a Nazi is probably the highest order of personal attack you can pull off, I wouldn't say he was necessarily the bad guy here.
You have zero objectivity."
The decision has already been made, get the fuk over it.
apparently you are putting words in his mouth too, according to FM he has not said anything of what you are accusing him for. we've been asking you for proof that he is a neo-nazi, yet u fail at giving it to us.jord wrote:
I don't even support the Iraq war. No wonder I despise you are your type. Stop trolling and putting shit in my mouth that I don't even say.AutralianChainsaw wrote:
It's ironic to see how two of the biggest supporter of the Iraq war (Jord and usmarine), a war that was supposedly fought for the spreading of democracy and freedom of speech, are the two guy who want to shut me up by having me banned.
Good job guys, Saddam would be proud of you.. He did the same you know, banning and/or killing the opposition.
Not only that but I have never even said the Iraq war was "For freedom of speech". You need to learn comprehension or something, fucking wow.
I have seen worse behavior from other forum members. That some are crying for these others to be unbanned says a lot about them and the desire for double standards.the alleged Nazi wrote:
hey
Dont like my post? Dont read them or just report them.
This guy insulted me and posted a pic of him in uniform thinking it would impress me.. You know damn well that any retard can join the army.. that nazi crap is getting old, those using that line have no argument.. and i will insult them back if they keep going,.. i can debate without personal attacks.. i never start the name calling..
whatever.. dont like the post, dont read them
I think the mods have made the right call here.
Warsaw43???Varegg wrote:
He was banned by Prodie on his old account for reasons shown in this thread, on his new account he has so far to my knowledge not posted anything nazi style hence no reason to ban him seeing as he haven't broken any of the forum rules ...
What a jackass
The forum certainly was a lot different back then.Ultrafunkula wrote:
Warsaw43???Varegg wrote:
He was banned by Prodie on his old account for reasons shown in this thread, on his new account he has so far to my knowledge not posted anything nazi style hence no reason to ban him seeing as he haven't broken any of the forum rules ...
What a jackass
Different or not, that thread made me almost piss my pants.jord wrote:
The forum certainly was a lot different back then.Ultrafunkula wrote:
Warsaw43???Varegg wrote:
He was banned by Prodie on his old account for reasons shown in this thread, on his new account he has so far to my knowledge not posted anything nazi style hence no reason to ban him seeing as he haven't broken any of the forum rules ...
What a jackass
Super.Ultrafunkula wrote:
Different or not, that thread made me almost piss my pants.jord wrote:
The forum certainly was a lot different back then.Ultrafunkula wrote:
Warsaw43???
What a jackass
And all I did was come looking for a topic on Yellowstone going ka-booie and I find this goldmine Need to visit Debate and Serious Lulz more often I see.jord wrote:
Super.Ultrafunkula wrote:
Different or not, that thread made me almost piss my pants.jord wrote:
The forum certainly was a lot different back then.
Meh this isn't common, once this is closed I doubt much "Lulz" will happen until February.Ultrafunkula wrote:
And all I did was come looking for a topic on Yellowstone going ka-booie and I find this goldmine Need to visit Debate and Serious Lulz more often I see.jord wrote:
Super.Ultrafunkula wrote:
Different or not, that thread made me almost piss my pants.
also, neo-nazis would not support arabic palestinians (brown people). thats why they are "white supremacists" so im sorry if i dont take this accusation seriously.
1. Lack of evidence
2. Accusation not even possible bc in the links given about him being a "neo-Nazi" he clearly states he supports the palestinians. A neo-nazi would never support a non-white peoples.
3. Ausch88 could mean anything really. auschwitz might be the meaning for Ausch, but the whole 88= heil hitler, thats a bit far fetched.
1. Lack of evidence
2. Accusation not even possible bc in the links given about him being a "neo-Nazi" he clearly states he supports the palestinians. A neo-nazi would never support a non-white peoples.
3. Ausch88 could mean anything really. auschwitz might be the meaning for Ausch, but the whole 88= heil hitler, thats a bit far fetched.
Not really, there are very good indicators for Ausch88 being linked to nazism and that is one of the reasons that account was banned, what most people seem to forget is that when making a new account you get a new chance to behave yourself and so far his new account is without remarks ...destruktion_6143 wrote:
also, neo-nazis would not support arabic palestinians (brown people). thats why they are "white supremacists" so im sorry if i dont take this accusation seriously.
1. Lack of evidence
2. Accusation not even possible bc in the links given about him being a "neo-Nazi" he clearly states he supports the palestinians. A neo-nazi would never support a non-white peoples.
3. Ausch88 could mean anything really. auschwitz might be the meaning for Ausch, but the whole 88= heil hitler, thats a bit far fetched.
He could of course be a Neo-nazi or KKK member or whatever, that doesn't matter as long as he doesn't post Neo-nazi or KKK related propaganda or similar content ... the content is the clue here, not the person ...
Chuy believes in second and even third chances, if he didn't the forum would be hopelessly empty ...
With that said it is good to debate these issues from time to time ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
his defence was he liked Australian made chainsaws.destruktion_6143 wrote:
also, neo-nazis would not support arabic palestinians (brown people). thats why they are "white supremacists" so im sorry if i dont take this accusation seriously.
1. Lack of evidence
2. Accusation not even possible bc in the links given about him being a "neo-Nazi" he clearly states he supports the palestinians. A neo-nazi would never support a non-white peoples.
3. Ausch88 could mean anything really. auschwitz might be the meaning for Ausch, but the whole 88= heil hitler, thats a bit far fetched.
he then posted a brand, who's chainsaws aren't even made in oz.
do you not think thats just a fucking pile of bollocks?
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
If a mathematician were here he would say that the chance the 6 or 7 clues being a coincidence and Ausch not being a Nazi sympathiser were about 1 in 450 250.FatherTed wrote:
his defence was he liked Australian made chainsaws.destruktion_6143 wrote:
also, neo-nazis would not support arabic palestinians (brown people). thats why they are "white supremacists" so im sorry if i dont take this accusation seriously.
1. Lack of evidence
2. Accusation not even possible bc in the links given about him being a "neo-Nazi" he clearly states he supports the palestinians. A neo-nazi would never support a non-white peoples.
3. Ausch88 could mean anything really. auschwitz might be the meaning for Ausch, but the whole 88= heil hitler, thats a bit far fetched.
he then posted a brand, who's chainsaws aren't even made in oz.
do you not think thats just a fucking pile of bollocks?
you still give no links of him being a neo-nazi, and like i said before, u calling him a neo-nazi is absurd since he obviously supports palestinians.jord wrote:
If a mathematician were here he would say that the chance the 6 or 7 clues being a coincidence and Ausch not being a Nazi sympathiser were about 1 in 450 250.FatherTed wrote:
his defence was he liked Australian made chainsaws.destruktion_6143 wrote:
also, neo-nazis would not support arabic palestinians (brown people). thats why they are "white supremacists" so im sorry if i dont take this accusation seriously.
1. Lack of evidence
2. Accusation not even possible bc in the links given about him being a "neo-Nazi" he clearly states he supports the palestinians. A neo-nazi would never support a non-white peoples.
3. Ausch88 could mean anything really. auschwitz might be the meaning for Ausch, but the whole 88= heil hitler, thats a bit far fetched.
he then posted a brand, who's chainsaws aren't even made in oz.
do you not think thats just a fucking pile of bollocks?
who's to say it isnt all a cover? google "auschwitz88", you get some interesting hits.destruktion_6143 wrote:
you still give no links of him being a neo-nazi, and like i said before, u calling him a neo-nazi is absurd since he obviously supports palestinians.jord wrote:
If a mathematician were here he would say that the chance the 6 or 7 clues being a coincidence and Ausch not being a Nazi sympathiser were about 1 in 450 250.FatherTed wrote:
his defence was he liked Australian made chainsaws.
he then posted a brand, who's chainsaws aren't even made in oz.
do you not think thats just a fucking pile of bollocks?
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Yeee. Why not use other cool nicks as Blue. cause you know how High end those Blaupunkt car stereos are. Or perhaps Crystal12am, since you just luv to drink some Cristal at NIGHT!FatherTed wrote:
who's to say it isnt all a cover? google "auschwitz88", you get some interesting hits.destruktion_6143 wrote:
you still give no links of him being a neo-nazi, and like i said before, u calling him a neo-nazi is absurd since he obviously supports palestinians.jord wrote:
If a mathematician were here he would say that the chance the 6 or 7 clues being a coincidence and Ausch not being a Nazi sympathiser were about 1 in 450 250.
well by your reasoning, my name is all about the destruktion of bill H.R. 6143 http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6143/show
Just stop. You can argue that in true nazism only the master race would be in it, then why the fuck do you think Hitler allied himself with the japs and italians. Take out a common enemy first then take out your allies.destruktion_6143 wrote:
also, neo-nazis would not support arabic palestinians (brown people). thats why they are "white supremacists" so im sorry if i dont take this accusation seriously.
1. Lack of evidence
2. Accusation not even possible bc in the links given about him being a "neo-Nazi" he clearly states he supports the palestinians. A neo-nazi would never support a non-white peoples.
3. Ausch88 could mean anything really. auschwitz might be the meaning for Ausch, but the whole 88= heil hitler, thats a bit far fetched.
what? like the first registered prisoner from auschwitz died at the age of 88? seriously man, the first page of the google results had no "pro nazi" pages, neither did the second, or the third... did u just scour the google results until u found one, then call him a neo nazi. classy.FatherTed wrote:
who's to say it isnt all a cover? google "auschwitz88", you get some interesting hits.destruktion_6143 wrote:
you still give no links of him being a neo-nazi, and like i said before, u calling him a neo-nazi is absurd since he obviously supports palestinians.jord wrote:
If a mathematician were here he would say that the chance the 6 or 7 clues being a coincidence and Ausch not being a Nazi sympathiser were about 1 in 450 250.
Hitler would disagree, he was very happy with the support of his regime from Egypt, Palestine, Iran, Iraq etc.destruktion_6143 wrote:
also, neo-nazis would not support arabic palestinians (brown people). thats why they are "white supremacists" so im sorry if i dont take this accusation seriously.
1. Lack of evidence
2. Accusation not even possible bc in the links given about him being a "neo-Nazi" he clearly states he supports the palestinians. A neo-nazi would never support a non-white peoples.
3. Ausch88 could mean anything really. auschwitz might be the meaning for Ausch, but the whole 88= heil hitler, thats a bit far fetched.
But I guess Hitler wasn't a real Nazi as he didn't hate Arabic people.
leave it as one word, as in a forum name.destruktion_6143 wrote:
what? like the first registered prisoner from auschwitz died at the age of 88? seriously man, the first page of the google results had no "pro nazi" pages, neither did the second, or the third... did u just scour the google results until u found one, then call him a neo nazi. classy.FatherTed wrote:
who's to say it isnt all a cover? google "auschwitz88", you get some interesting hits.destruktion_6143 wrote:
you still give no links of him being a neo-nazi, and like i said before, u calling him a neo-nazi is absurd since he obviously supports palestinians.
Here, you obviously have problems so i'll give you the link: http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&am … &meta=
Yeah, so check the first three links.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
im talking about neo-nazis. they dont follow hitlers beliefs, they are more radical and white-supremicist than hitler ever was. jord accused him of being a neo-nazi.Vilham wrote:
Hitler would disagree, he was very happy with the support of his regime from Egypt, Palestine, Iran, Iraq etc.destruktion_6143 wrote:
also, neo-nazis would not support arabic palestinians (brown people). thats why they are "white supremacists" so im sorry if i dont take this accusation seriously.
1. Lack of evidence
2. Accusation not even possible bc in the links given about him being a "neo-Nazi" he clearly states he supports the palestinians. A neo-nazi would never support a non-white peoples.
3. Ausch88 could mean anything really. auschwitz might be the meaning for Ausch, but the whole 88= heil hitler, thats a bit far fetched.
But I guess Hitler wasn't a real Nazi as he didn't hate Arabic people.