BF2S Forums More than one way to rob a bank.

jord wrote:

It's a valid argument. If I post a blog article with some shred of truth in it and you have to spend 30 minutes dissecting out the cunts ignoramus opinions then you'd be pissed too. If you prefer we can start discussing the "Substance", or lack of.

Here goes nothing:

Them fucking scrounging Muslims always looking for the easy way out and never willing to work. Coming to my country and suing us in our time of need, who do they think they are? Stupid bitch she deserves a fine of 15 million for being that selfish. Rabble rabble rabble. Why am I always seeing this terrorists in the news? It must be because they're always stirring up shit, god damn I wish I lived 300 years ago.

well I'd have to agree that that article was insanely annoying to read, doesn't take away the fact that this woman is a cunnnnnnnt, muslim or not.

I agree it was one sided towards the azn comments, but I may have been a bit easy towards that seeing as I never ever read the daily mail. -to me it sounded more like an example of how there's something wrong with our system, that she is even able to sue someone for a redicoules sum of money for, nothing.

M3thod wrote:

A reliable and credible source is important.  Journalism is easily manipulated.

well to me this particular story sounds pretty real, journalism is manipulated everywhere because every single media institution shoves down their own opinion down the public's throat one way or another, I mean look at how Israel is portrayed in the news now after the Gaza attacks. Over here, they haven't said absolutely ANYTHING about the cease fire was in place, and the rockets attacks. They made it look like Israel attacked out of the blue.

Last edited by dayarath (2009-01-07 11:01:07)

I would do the same in her position and i wouldn't give a shit what people thought. ITS FUKIN 16 MILLIOn! i could start trading friends with Warren Buffet with that much (get it ?, instead of buying friends.. ).  Which idiot thinks they would not to the same in her position ?

Last edited by mafia996630 (2009-01-07 13:02:26)

Mekstizzle wrote:

ATG wrote:

m3thod wrote:

in the UK ethnic minorities from the indian sub continent (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi) are known as Asians, as they're are way more of them than the Chinese, Japs etc

For the Americans it's the other way round.

only if you are geographically ignorant, actually.

Well calling someone Asian is stupid no matter what they are. Chinese or Indian or whatever. The continent is fucking massive and has, literally, like over 9000 ethnic groups and languages. Yet you get fags that want to clump all East Asians together and call them Asians (USA) or its the same thing with South Asians (UK). And then you get people who go onto accept this stupid generalisation with all this "Asian pride" crap, I mean for fuck sake, why do you have to accept this inane generalisation. Shitloads don't like these general terms but it seems there ain't shit you can do. Continental generalisations, e.g calling someone "European" or "Asian" or "African" is one of my major pet peeves. Well, not so much African, cos they seem to promote that more than non-Africans.

I forgot what I was saying now, but yeah, these general terms are gay

We call all Tribes in Australia "Aboriginals". I'm sure they'd rather be called whatever their tribes name is and not be grouped in with their rivals. And yet, we do it. There is no large differance between them, just as there isn't between Vietnamese and Cambodian. If they want their own names then they'd better start doing something massively different from the rest of their continent.

I clicked the wrong forum. Meant to go to EE. Bye.

usmarine wrote:

asian?  lulz.

Half the topic is discussing how our use of Asian is different to yours, yet you come in, after not posting for some days, and then post this dumb post
























welcome back <3

usmarine wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

Half the topic is discussing how our use of Asian is different to yours, yet you come in, after not posting for some days, and then post this dumb post

i posted yesterday you special child.

He's got you there Skittles, you special little man.

America doesn't call them Asians, we call yellow people Asian Americans.

Just like we do with black people and call them African Americans.

So you European Americans, white people, can shove it.

CameronPoe wrote:

Wow Daily Mail printing an irrelevant story about a Muslim again? Never. I bet they wouldn't have reported it if it was a nice white Christian girl... or would have reported it in a completely different tone.... especially if the boss was Muslim....

Lol, just file it under all of your other "irrelevant" Muslim stories, you know, the file containing riots over cartoons, Islamic law in Europe and all the others.

The Daily Mail is a fairly venal rag TBH

Those are some seriously tall, heavy Asians.

ghettoperson wrote:

Those are some seriously tall, heavy Asians.

Hahahaha yeah, I want a little Thai Bride thank you very much.

Spoiler (highlight to read):
*Googles "Thai Bride"*

TheAussieReaper wrote:

DrunkFace wrote:

http://www.naturalhistoryonthenet.com/C … inents.gif
You have a majority of ancestry from the green area you are Asian.... Deal with it!!!!

Russians are Asian?

For the most part.

Not all of russia is in Asia tho

ghettoperson wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

America doesn't call them Asians, we call yellow people Asian Americans.

Just like we do with black people and call them African Americans.

So you European Americans, white people, can shove it.

If I was black, and I went to the States, would people say I was a African Britain? Or are all black people automatically African American?

And thus is the logical fallacy of the ridiculous PC movement.

And the answer to your second question is "yes".