Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6852|San Diego, CA, USA
A necrophiliac?
kylef
Gone
+1,352|6797|N. Ireland
I think it is pretty amusing that despite OPEC cutting supply (wow, none of us saw that coming...) prices keep coming down. Saudi's wish of $75/barrel is bleak and I think Obama will do a lot for alternative energy sources.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6978|Canberra, AUS

kylef wrote:

I think it is pretty amusing that despite OPEC cutting supply (wow, none of us saw that coming...) prices keep coming down. Saudi's wish of $75/barrel is bleak and I think Obama will do a lot for alternative energy sources.
Just imagine - they might actually have to open up! Diversify! Progess!
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Roger Lesboules
Ah ben tabarnak!
+316|6881|Abitibi-Temiscamingue. Québec!

too_money2007 wrote:

Hopefully it stays the same. I like filling up my car for $17.
You drive a Firefly right?

My car cost about 40 to fill up.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7065

you know there was a story out of California where they wanted to install solar panels in the Mojave desert but the green weenies stop them because it might endanger some squirrels or something.

seriously you green tards, make up your fucking mind.  i truly believe you guys dont want green technology because then you will have nothing to cry about.  you all blame the neo cons and people who hate gore, well guess what retards, it was a repub trying to install all those panels.
Diesel_dyk
Object in mirror will feel larger than it appears
+178|6298|Truthistan
From 1985 to 1999 the price of oil was on average about $17 a barrel. From 2000 to June of 2008 the price of oil was driven solely by speculation. In June 2008 Congress passed the law that plugged the Eron loophole that permitted unregulated energy trading. Since June the price of oil has been on a steady decline. That bubble has burst big time and I think that the price is headed back to the historical price of $17.

99 cent gas anyone??? Although I could live with the $1.38 a gallon gas that I got last week.

As for alternative energy, I would include modernizing the power grid and lots of nuclear power.... those things are necessary and really should not be affected by the price of oil. Get all the homes on electricity and get rid of gas and oil heating... and use those natural resources for cars and shipping.

Give us nuclear power and electric cars
DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6985|Disaster Free Zone

usmarine wrote:

you know there was a story out of California where they wanted to install solar panels in the Mojave desert but the green weenies stop them because it might endanger some squirrels or something.

seriously you green tards, make up your fucking mind.  i truly believe you guys dont want green technology because then you will have nothing to cry about.  you all blame the neo cons and people who hate gore, well guess what retards, it was a repub trying to install all those panels.
As good as that sounds, Solar cells are (atm) expensive and inefficient. Solar is also not a viable replacement for current power plants because it relies too much on the weather conditions. It is only a complementary system so is therefor rather pointless. It's like driving a prius, it may sound good in theory, but it's really just a waste of time.

We have to develop replacement base load power, something that is reliable and constant. Some things that should be considered are:
Geothermal
Tidal
Wave
High altitude wind  (ie in the jet streams)
Orbital solar (takes weather, day/night, atmospheric absorption out of the equation)
Nuclear Fusion
Hydro

Similarly to go along with clean, efficient power sources we can change automobile fuels from petrol and diesel to hydrogen relatively easily. All we need is for car companies to stop wasting there time on hybrid and battery powered vehicles and develop hydrogen ones instead.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7065

DrunkFace wrote:

Solar is also not a viable replacement for current power plants because it relies too much on the weather conditions.
you ever been in the mojave?  sun aint the issue in this case.
DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6985|Disaster Free Zone

usmarine wrote:

DrunkFace wrote:

Solar is also not a viable replacement for current power plants because it relies too much on the weather conditions.
you ever been in the mojave?  sun aint the issue in this case.
Because its never night there either I suppose?

You need something that works 24/7 reliably and can produce a constant output.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6978|Canberra, AUS
There are ways to produce baseload with solar.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7065

DrunkFace wrote:

usmarine wrote:

DrunkFace wrote:

Solar is also not a viable replacement for current power plants because it relies too much on the weather conditions.
you ever been in the mojave?  sun aint the issue in this case.
Because its never night there either I suppose?

You need something that works 24/7 reliably and can produce a constant output.
ummm....you need a combination of sources.  and the sun and wind are pretty good.  do you know anything about solar panels?  no offence but it appears you dont know anything about them.
deeznutz1245
Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.
+483|6797|Connecticut

DrunkFace wrote:

Because its never night there either I suppose?

You need something that works 24/7 reliably and can produce a constant output.
Errr, you do realize that um. Nevermind. Anyway, we should just get slaves to push a huge wheel that produces electricity.
Malloy must go
-CARNIFEX-[LOC]
Da Blooze
+111|6957
After many consecutive years of increasing and record-breaking profits, why WOULDN'T big oil/OPEC/etc. agree let oil prices drop drastically for a while (several years even?) to essentially quell the newly developing societal impetus for affordable, alternative energy?

Sounds awfully conspiratorial, I know, but I have always considered the ways in which energy prices are manipulated behind the scenes to be pretty scary stuff when you think about it, whether it's a company like Enron or Exxon, or even a national gov't, doing it.



Seriously, though, is there anything that would prevent such a scheme to take a big hit on profits for a while to prevent a source of competition from gaining a market foothold?  Seems like a pretty easy and effective way to make societies with short attention spans forget about the need for alternative energy.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/12516/Bitch%20Hunter%20Sig.jpg
kylef
Gone
+1,352|6797|N. Ireland
Wait - with any 'luck' there will be a spike in oil prices and everyone will go green. In both senses.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6852|San Diego, CA, USA
I doubt the oil companies were responsible for driving prices down in the short term...that would had required too much collusion. 

Seems more likely that a global recession was the cause.


As for alternative energy programs are at a stand-still with our financial crisis and all.  I've heard some reports that some alternative energy companies are filing bankruptcy because of the downturn in oil prices?  Is that true?

Can our governments really afford to spend money on alternative energy programs now?
specialistx2324
hahahahahhaa
+244|6992|arica harbour
alternative energy has ways to go thanks to greedy oil companies backed by lobyists.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6852|San Diego, CA, USA
If someone could just show 'greedy oil' how to make money on alternative energy we would have had this licked yesterday.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6978|Canberra, AUS

Harmor wrote:

Can our governments really afford not to spend money on alternative energy programs now?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6978|Canberra, AUS

Harmor wrote:

If someone could just show 'greedy oil' how to make money on alternative energy we would have had this licked yesterday.
I have a whole essay-type response to this problem (to show how this problem disappeared long ago, but big oil hasn't followed yet because they're BIG OIL), but I don't have time to post it now. Maybe later.

For now, look at GE Transportation + Norway.

Besides which, why don't you think we can afford to spend money on alternatives NOW?

Last edited by Spark (2008-12-23 23:37:55)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
kylef
Gone
+1,352|6797|N. Ireland
There are still committments to be held long before the 'crisis', (I'd like to) hope that they are still working on them. Obama's energy plan calls to "Ensure 10 percent of our electricity comes from renewable sources by 2012, and 25 percent by 2025" - right now the UK is just a follower and let's face it, it'll do something similar.

Oh, Britain announced a motor bailout?
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6852|San Diego, CA, USA
Do we need a carbon tax to incentivise alternative energy?
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6859

Harmor wrote:

Do we need a carbon tax to incentivise alternative energy?
We already have one.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6852|San Diego, CA, USA

CameronPoe wrote:

Harmor wrote:

Do we need a carbon tax to incentivise alternative energy?
We already have one.
Europe has one?  I thought I heard you guys doing something like that, but don't know the particulars.

My only worry with ANY tax right now is that it'll prolong the slowdown.
venom6
Since day One.
+247|6862|Hungary
Until there is oil in the earth what can be sold there wont be any energy for free or cars what can operate with water.
They WONT let it!
Surprised why all the inventors who created water cars were silenced?
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6978|Canberra, AUS

venom6 wrote:

Until there is oil in the earth what can be sold there wont be any energy for free or cars what can operate with water.
They WONT let it!
Surprised why all the inventors who created water cars were silenced?
?

There is no such thing as a car that runs on water. Simple chemistry - breaking bonds takes energy.


Harmor wrote:

Do we need a carbon tax to incentivise alternative energy?
I'm not an economist but I think it would help. As for cars... I would like to retract one of my earlier statements - I said that you'd be better off not using an electric car while the grid was on coal. I've looked deeper and in fact, it is cleaner to use coal on the grid than petrol in the tank.

Much cheaper, too.

Last edited by Spark (2008-12-24 18:24:05)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard