blah blah. i am not going to talk to someone who compares it to auschwitz. just like .sup i am done with you.
You missed the point and once again went for the easy bit, all I was saying was, if the US thought they weren't terrorist enough so that they freed them yet they actually were bad guys, then that's their fault.SealXo wrote:
PureFodder wrote:
Alleged terrorists. No terrorist is being let loose, only those who were arrested without enough evidence to convict them. The ones that may have enough evidence are going to trial to find out if the evidence is strong enough to convict them.Well, Commander Jeffrey Gorden, the Pentagon's spokesman, says, "our reports indicate that at least thirty former Guantanamo detainees have taken part in anti-coalition militanat activities after leaving U.S detention.."Mekstizzle wrote:
So they're already letting terrorists run free? And if they close it, then ALL of them will be free? Where are you getting this info that they're just letting these guys go. Unless the guys they're letting go aren't terrorists, and they've found out that, that thought is strong enough to let them go.SealXo wrote:
They are already being released from GITMO as it is. So if it closes it would be much worse.
So, a terrorist is a terrorist.
The main point is, that nobody has said that they're all going to be freed anyway. You're just pulling that part out of your arse in an attempt to cause hysteria.
Last edited by Mekstizzle (2008-11-10 09:34:58)
blah blah blah I have no arguments so I'm just gonna act offended and leave.usmarine wrote:
blah blah. i am not going to talk to someone who compares it to auschwitz. just like .sup i am done with you.
ƒ³
been argued before. use the search function for your answers. good day .sup
Full circleoug wrote:
How did we figure that?SealXo wrote:
They obviously arn't potentially innocent.Same argument reversed: How would you like it if your son was innocent and was taken to Gitmo by mistake?SealXo wrote:
I just think they should be held until the END of the war. Then let go. How would you like it if YOU were a father and your son got killed by a GITMO release e?
I know it's been argued before. That's why I can't understand how you can keep saying what you are. What .sup btw? (lol see what i did there?)usmarine wrote:
been argued before. use the search function for your answers. good day .sup
ƒ³
i can keep saying what i am because i was shot at by some of them. thats why. simple as that. i dont give a fuck about them.
why are (almost) all the fellow europeans on this forum retards and (uninformed) douches
Last edited by dayarath (2008-11-10 09:39:35)
inane little opines
loldayarath wrote:
why are (almost) all the fellow europeans on this forum retards and (uninformed) douches
You keep referring to "them" as if they're the ones who shot you. Emotions are clouding your thought obviously. Did you ever stop to think that some of them may be innocent?usmarine wrote:
i can keep saying what i am because i was shot at by some of them. thats why. simple as that. i dont give a fuck about them.
All I'm saying is that a fair trial would make sure that everyone gets what they deserve. Be they guilty or innocent.
ƒ³
inform us then o wise onedayarath wrote:
why are (almost) all the fellow europeans on this forum retards and (uninformed) douches
i'm all ears
edit: I take it you're referring to me but are too much of a wuss to say it in my face
Last edited by oug (2008-11-10 09:43:36)
ƒ³
What the fuck are you talking about, have you even read the OP or the title of this topic? You're calling us the retards, when you don't even read the OP or the title yourself. The guy is talking about how all the terrorists in gitmo are going to be freed and back to their bombing-america ways just because they're thinking of closing down gitmo. That, is what you call stupid.dayarath wrote:
why are (almost) all the fellow europeans on this forum retards and (uninformed) douches
It's funny how I'm the only one that seems to notice this, whilst everyone else is yelling about something else.
And, might I add, the only reason he's getting so hysterical and making up his own conclusions (aka talking out of his arse) is because the idea was presented by the US Political party he happens to dislike.
Last edited by Mekstizzle (2008-11-10 09:44:57)
I wasn't talking about the OP.Mekstizzle wrote:
What the fuck are you talking about, have you even read the OP or the title of this topic? You're calling us the retards, when you don't even read the OP or the title yourself. The guy is talking about how all the terrorists in gitmo are going to be freed and back to their bombing-america ways just because they're thinking of closing down gitmo. That, is what you call stupid.dayarath wrote:
why are (almost) all the fellow europeans on this forum retards and (uninformed) douches
It's funny how I'm the only one that seems to notice this, whilst everyone else is yelling about something else.
And, might I add, the only reason he's getting so hysterical and making up his own conclusions (aka talking out of his arse) is because the idea was presented by the US Political party he happens to dislike.
and I said almost mek, that almost didn't include you.
on the edit; ok, I think you're a retard, there, I said it *phew*.Oug wrote:
inform us then o wise one
i'm all ears
edit: I take it you're referring to me but are too much of a wuss to say it in my face
comparing gitmo to aconcentration camp i.e. auschwitz is beyond my sense of comprehension.
Last edited by dayarath (2008-11-10 10:13:33)
inane little opines
They could all be innocent, they could all be terrorists who want nothing more than to wipe America off of the face of the earth. Either of those things is besides the point. Everyone deserves a fair trial. If rapists and serial killers get fair trials, even after they admitted to committing their crimes.
Why does the USA have to go back 100 years by seeing everyone from one race as inferior (or in this case, as a bunch of terrorists)?
Oh, and whoever said usmarine is a holocaust denier: you're an idiot. Gitmo, no matter how unjust, is not a concentration camp, and the US military are not a bunch of Nazis.
-kon
Why does the USA have to go back 100 years by seeing everyone from one race as inferior (or in this case, as a bunch of terrorists)?
Oh, and whoever said usmarine is a holocaust denier: you're an idiot. Gitmo, no matter how unjust, is not a concentration camp, and the US military are not a bunch of Nazis.
-kon
He's just copying McCain.
Sounds like GWB is trying to beat him to it.
From your article
From your article
Bush is letting the terrorists go! Ahhh, run for the hills!The White House said Friday that President Bush has made closing the prison in Cuba a priority and that Bush's top aides are in active discussions about the subject.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-11-10 12:24:37)
Let's put it this way:
If Venezuela or Iran had a 'Gitmo' in which they held American prisoners - would they be being tried for war crimes? You can fucking bet your ass they would.
If Venezuela or Iran had a 'Gitmo' in which they held American prisoners - would they be being tried for war crimes? You can fucking bet your ass they would.
*cough*CameronPoe wrote:
Let's put it this way:
If Venezuela or Iran had a 'Gitmo' in which they held American prisoners - would they be being tried for war crimes? You can fucking bet your ass they would.
in lots of countries, women dont get trials
*cough*
where's your outrage?
Appeasement.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
Ok so yea.. it was going to close anyways.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
who cares if he is closing ONE prison camp because its so publicly known? you think thats the only one in the world? no one is going free, my friends.
It's fucking terrible, but at least they're doing it to their own.usmarine wrote:
*cough*CameronPoe wrote:
Let's put it this way:
If Venezuela or Iran had a 'Gitmo' in which they held American prisoners - would they be being tried for war crimes? You can fucking bet your ass they would.
in lots of countries, women dont get trials
*cough*
where's your outrage?
Closing Gitmo doesn't solve the illegal Military Courts (which are a fucking joke anyway) that these people have been charged under.
Illegal? What flag do these guys operate under? Do tell.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Closing Gitmo doesn't solve the illegal Military Courts (which are a fucking joke anyway) that these people have been charged under.
I'm against them btw.. but this just amuses me.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Flag? That's got nothing to do with it. These people have been held, in some cases 5 years, without charge.Kmarion wrote:
Illegal? What flag do these guys operate under? Do tell.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Closing Gitmo doesn't solve the illegal Military Courts (which are a fucking joke anyway) that these people have been charged under.
I'm against them btw.. but this just amuses me.
And have information obtained while under torture and duress held against them.
That goes against international law, US law, and it is a human rights violation.
So tell me, please, what flag these guys should be waving if that means that they are considered deserving of the same human rights you and I enjoy.