Just don't say people are anti US only. Placing missiles and radars in Europe is bad and its both US and Russia's fault.usmarine wrote:
well since most people here are from the US, and russia was our enemy for a long time........duh.Sup wrote:
Whatever Russia does is also anti Russia,
And there's where we disagree. I look forward to a time when we don't have to live under the threat of nuclear annihilation. It can only keep the peace so long before someone fucks up. While this system will not benefit the US, it is a step in the right direction and I hope both the US and Russia continue to make moves to out date ICBM's..Sup wrote:
Just don't say people are anti US only. Placing missiles and radars in Europe is bad and its both US and Russia's fault.usmarine wrote:
well since most people here are from the US, and russia was our enemy for a long time........duh.Sup wrote:
Whatever Russia does is also anti Russia,
you are. just admit it. its quite obvious..Sup wrote:
Just don't say people are anti US only.
"Mark my words," the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. "It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."Kmarion wrote:
Biden said he was hoping for? I know there was a lot of hope rhetoric being thrown around but I don't recall him saying he was hoping for a crisis..lol.
I was. But a new president was elected. New hope is on the horizon.usmarine wrote:
you are. just admit it. its quite obvious..Sup wrote:
Just don't say people are anti US only.
hmmmm..well they said they support georgia and stuff. what say you now? or did you not see that?.Sup wrote:
I was. But a new president was elected. New hope is on the horizon.
Then what is the right way to neutralize ICBM's? No one wants the other guy to have them, but no one is willing to give them up. We have to live with the fact that the nuclear cloud will always be hanging over us. But we need to take steps to reduce the threat..Sup wrote:
I was. But a new president was elected. New hope is on the horizon.usmarine wrote:
you are. just admit it. its quite obvious..Sup wrote:
Just don't say people are anti US only.
@Commie placing radars and missiles is not the right way and cos of those emplacements Russia placed their missiles. Russia sees placing that close to their border an act of terror and we all know Russia is very delicate.
And Indians will take yours back.---->went to your level. pretty pathetic.usmarine wrote:
mother russia will take back her old land. its a matter of time. better run .sup
And if it is a nuclear war then what? Do you think on the Americans and Russians die?.Sup wrote:
Commie if someone will really attack your country he will have to destroy the defensive systems first but that will mean bombing villages where the systems are placed. People who live there werent in danger till know when they started constructing those systems. You certainly feel safer but people living next to those systems are very much endangered.
Last edited by Commie Killer (2008-11-05 18:33:43)
Provocations make wars and missile silos are provocations.Commie Killer wrote:
And if it is a nuclear war then what? Do you think on the Americans and Russians die?.Sup wrote:
Commie if someone will really attack your country he will have to destroy the defensive systems first but that will mean bombing villages where the systems are placed. People who live there werent in danger till know when they started constructing those systems. You certainly feel safer but people living next to those systems are very much endangered.
indians have icbm's and tanks? they also invaded arizona a couple months ago right? i better be worried. nice try..Sup wrote:
And Indians will take yours back.---->went to your level. pretty pathetic.usmarine wrote:
mother russia will take back her old land. its a matter of time. better run .sup
Jesus Christ man, how is this a provocation? It cant even be used unless someone else shoots first, and then it still cant harm the other side..Sup wrote:
Provocations make wars and missile silos are provocations.Commie Killer wrote:
And if it is a nuclear war then what? Do you think on the Americans and Russians die?.Sup wrote:
Commie if someone will really attack your country he will have to destroy the defensive systems first but that will mean bombing villages where the systems are placed. People who live there werent in danger till know when they started constructing those systems. You certainly feel safer but people living next to those systems are very much endangered.
What are you talking about anyway? Are you drunk again? Go here http://www.aa.org/ and do yourself a favour.usmarine wrote:
indians have icbm's and tanks? they also invaded arizona a couple months ago right? i better be worried. nice try..Sup wrote:
And Indians will take yours back.---->went to your level. pretty pathetic.usmarine wrote:
mother russia will take back her old land. its a matter of time. better run .sup
Last edited by .Sup (2008-11-05 18:39:36)
weapons arent his strong point me thinks. actually, i dont know what is tbh.Commie Killer wrote:
Jesus Christ man, how is this a provocation? It cant even be used unless someone else shoots first, and then it still cant harm the other side.
If you can't see how placing missiles close to border can be provocative then I really don't see a reason to discuss about this with you anymore.Commie Killer wrote:
Jesus Christ man, how is this a provocation? It cant even be used unless someone else shoots first, and then it still cant harm the other side..Sup wrote:
Provocations make wars and missile silos are provocations.Commie Killer wrote:
And if it is a nuclear war then what? Do you think on the Americans and Russians die?
Common sense isn't either.usmarine wrote:
weapons arent his strong point me thinks. actually, i dont know what is tbh.Commie Killer wrote:
Jesus Christ man, how is this a provocation? It cant even be used unless someone else shoots first, and then it still cant harm the other side.
I'm sorry I'm so ignorant. Explain it please..Sup wrote:
If you can't see how placing missiles close to border can be provocative then I really don't see a reason to discuss about this with you anymore.Commie Killer wrote:
Jesus Christ man, how is this a provocation? It cant even be used unless someone else shoots first, and then it still cant harm the other side..Sup wrote:
Provocations make wars and missile silos are provocations.
You also like irony I see and don't get offensive or I'll get a bad perspective about you.Commie Killer wrote:
Common sense isn't either.usmarine wrote:
weapons arent his strong point me thinks. actually, i dont know what is tbh.Commie Killer wrote:
Jesus Christ man, how is this a provocation? It cant even be used unless someone else shoots first, and then it still cant harm the other side.
lewl.Sup wrote:
don't get offensive or I'll get a bad perspective about you.
yeah this should be interestingSchwarzelungen wrote:
woooooo ww3
You are home watching through a window and a boy you dislike shows you his ass next to your fence. Hope I put in a enough of a simplystic way for you to understand.Commie Killer wrote:
I'm sorry I'm so ignorant. Explain it please..Sup wrote:
If you can't see how placing missiles close to border can be provocative then I really don't see a reason to discuss about this with you anymore.Commie Killer wrote:
Jesus Christ man, how is this a provocation? It cant even be used unless someone else shoots first, and then it still cant harm the other side.
I was unable to make any sense out of the sentence..Sup wrote:
You are home watching through a window and a boy you dislike shows you his ass next to your fence. Hope I put in a enough of a simplystic way for you to understand.Commie Killer wrote:
I'm sorry I'm so ignorant. Explain it please..Sup wrote:
If you can't see how placing missiles close to border can be provocative then I really don't see a reason to discuss about this with you anymore.
Last edited by Commie Killer (2008-11-05 18:45:39)
So the bulb didn't light on? Too bad.Commie Killer wrote:
I was unable to make any sense out of the sentence..Sup wrote:
You are home watching through a window and a boy you dislike shows you his ass next to your fence. Hope I put in a enough of a simplystic way for you to understand.Commie Killer wrote:
I'm sorry I'm so ignorant. Explain it please.
But seriously, this whole throwing insults back and forth is boring. I wanna know how this thing is provocative in your opinion.