FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6441|'Murka

ATG wrote:

I think Osama Bin Laden might have done a better job running the U.S. than the pack of parasites and criminals that passes for leadership we have now.
He's got more executive experience than the guy we're about to elect President...
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6559|Global Command
But it's change we can believe in.
Nevermind the nature of said change.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6435|North Carolina

FEOS wrote:

ATG wrote:

I think Osama Bin Laden might have done a better job running the U.S. than the pack of parasites and criminals that passes for leadership we have now.
He's got more executive experience than the guy we're about to elect President...
Considering how long Bush was governor before being president, that should show you how much experience matters....
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6720|Tampa Bay Florida

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Ah, good ol' reverse psychology.
Funny, don't recall you saying that during the dozens of times other members have posted topics saying such and such middle eastern whackjob group wants the Democrats to win. 

I could be wrong though.
It wouldn't be reverse psychology then... 
  AQ want's the candidate that's softer on dealing with them(Obama)... so they can do their thing without interruption...
so they say they hope McCain wins... hence, reverse psychology.... lol
ummmm I got that. 

So, if they endorse the Democrats, they really mean it, and if they endorse Republicans, its reverse psychology?  lol.  Or do you really think that they center of everything in the universe revolves around Iraq?  Didn't we kick al-Qaeda out of there a few months ago?

Please tell us how you are on expert on analysing foreign terrorists messages.  I recall McCain saying he'll follow bin Laden to the gates of hell, but then when Obama said we should take more action in Pakistan, he said that Obama was trying to start a war.
GorillaTicTacs
Member
+231|6404|Kyiv, Ukraine
cb and immortal have that same inside track that McCain does.  McCain has said repeatedly that he knows exactly where Osama is and if elected president he'll have him hauled in to the precinct.

There must be some AM radio channel somewhere that Al Qaeda uses to let the wingnuts know what's really going on.  You wouldn't want to be suddenly 15th page news as a major terrorist operation...you need to keep your biggest fans fired up.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6441|'Murka

Turquoise wrote:

FEOS wrote:

ATG wrote:

I think Osama Bin Laden might have done a better job running the U.S. than the pack of parasites and criminals that passes for leadership we have now.
He's got more executive experience than the guy we're about to elect President...
Considering how long Bush was governor before being president, that should show you how much experience matters....
Apparently it means more for the VP candidate than it does for the top job.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6179|'straya

usmarine wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

lol...  Ok...  let me rephrase...  Invading Iraq.
oooo.  replace the nucks with australia and spain then.
Because it was australia and spain who lead the "coalition of the willing" to war, bypassing the UN and making a royal arse of things right?
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6441|'Murka

I guess Australia, the UK, Spain, and others don't have independent thought and decision-making?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6435|North Carolina

FEOS wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

FEOS wrote:


He's got more executive experience than the guy we're about to elect President...
Considering how long Bush was governor before being president, that should show you how much experience matters....
Apparently it means more for the VP candidate than it does for the top job.
Touche...   Honestly, the more I think about it, the less I want to vote for any of them.  The government is corrupt and mostly beyond redemption.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6792

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

lol...  Ok...  let me rephrase...  Invading Iraq.
oooo.  replace the nucks with australia and spain then.
Because it was australia and spain who lead the "coalition of the willing" to war, bypassing the UN and making a royal arse of things right?

FEOS wrote:

I guess Australia, the UK, Spain, and others don't have independent thought and decision-making?
yes apparently you all are too stupid or something.  who knows.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6651|London, England

FEOS wrote:

I guess Australia, the UK, Spain, and others don't have independent thought and decision-making?
No, we really don't. Well I don't know about Australia and Spain, but here in the UK, we don't. Don't worry, we're working on getting that changed. Over here, government have MUCH more power than in your country. Over in the US, the people can actually, sometimes, possibly change things that your fed government sometimes does. Over here, no chance whatsoever. You can't even count on individual politicians making a stand or listening to the people. Saying that, ontop of the fact that our politicians would blindly follow the US anywhere it goes, there was fuck all we could do except watch.

France is a country that did have independent thought, that led to wide spread anti-French sentiment throughout your country. Although at the end of the day, France gained a few levels of respect doing what it wanted to do, and the UK lost just about any respect it had left on the international stage.

I suppose it is our fault for voting the cunts in. But who would've thought a leftist socialist party (Labour) would be so fucking neocon. Played us all like a bunch of fools. Not that I would ever vote for party like Labour (back then, too young to vote)

FEOS wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

FEOS wrote:

He's got more executive experience than the guy we're about to elect President...
Considering how long Bush was governor before being president, that should show you how much experience matters....
Apparently it means more for the VP candidate than it does for the top job.
Make your mind up. Your first post, you're talking about how experience is all the rage and how even Osama has more experience than Obama...

And then, just as someone brings up a post about Bush, and how much experience he had and how that led to nowhere. You suddenly switch on the "well look at how much they care about experience when it comes to the VP" (probably talking about how everyone says Palin isn't ready..?) - Make your mind up, on one hand, it looks like you're defending (Palin?) from the people who are talking about her inexperience. On the other, you're complaining that Obama has no experience and even Osama has more.

I like the way you dodged Turquoises response though. You brought up the experience card, and then someone brought up a counter and then you mention something else and flip your position on the matter whilst doing that...without actually responding to what he said.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6441|'Murka

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Considering how long Bush was governor before being president, that should show you how much experience matters....
Apparently it means more for the VP candidate than it does for the top job.
Make your mind up. Your first post, you're talking about how experience is all the rage and how even Osama has more experience than Obama...

And then, just as someone brings up a post about Bush, and how much experience he had and how that led to nowhere. You suddenly switch on the "well look at how much they care about experience when it comes to the VP" (probably talking about how everyone says Palin isn't ready..?) - Make your mind up, on one hand, it looks like you're defending (Palin?) from the people who are talking about her inexperience. On the other, you're complaining that Obama has no experience and even Osama has more.

I like the way you dodged Turquoises response though. You brought up the experience card, and then someone brought up a counter and then you mention something else and flip your position on the matter whilst doing that...without actually responding to what he said.
So you don't see the consistency in my position or is it that you don't see the inconsistency in the others? Or did you just miss the sarcastic shot at those who claim experience isn't important for the top job, but is absolutely critical for the VP?

That's the paradox of McCain choosing Palin: he defuses the experience card, regardless of how it's played. But somehow people here think it makes complete sense to bash Palin for her lack of experience, yet laud Obama for exactly the same thing.

Try to keep up, Mek.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6651|London, England
I was going to mention that others are being hypocritical like that too. But I felt my post was already too long so I kept to sticking it to you

Actually I was just too lazy to edit it in.

Last edited by Mek-Stizzle (2008-10-25 15:11:36)

Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6179|'straya

usmarine wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

usmarine wrote:

oooo.  replace the nucks with australia and spain then.
Because it was australia and spain who lead the "coalition of the willing" to war, bypassing the UN and making a royal arse of things right?

FEOS wrote:

I guess Australia, the UK, Spain, and others don't have independent thought and decision-making?
yes apparently you all are too stupid or something.  who knows.
Ah my mistake. i didnt realise that i could tell the Australian government not to go to war. i dunno what it is like in america.... but once their voted in, suddenly we dont matter anymore. it seems the government would do anything to please america. so, yes, america lead us into the war... its not like Australia, UK, spain would have even considered invading iraq until Mr Bush told them to

Last edited by Little BaBy JESUS (2008-10-25 15:35:08)

FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6441|'Murka

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:


Because it was australia and spain who lead the "coalition of the willing" to war, bypassing the UN and making a royal arse of things right?

FEOS wrote:

I guess Australia, the UK, Spain, and others don't have independent thought and decision-making?
yes apparently you all are too stupid or something.  who knows.
Ah my mistake. i didnt realise that i could tell the Australian government not to go to war. i dunno what it is like in america.... but once their voted in, suddenly we dont matter anymore. it seems the government would do anything to please america. so, yes, america lead us into the war... its not like Australia, UK, spain would have even considered invading iraq until Mr Bush told them to
Funny thing is that in the US, we can't tell the government not to go to war, either. Ain't that a bitch?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6179|'straya

FEOS wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

Because it was australia and spain who lead the "coalition of the willing" to war, bypassing the UN and making a royal arse of things right?
yes apparently you all are too stupid or something.  who knows.
Ah my mistake. i didnt realise that i could tell the Australian government not to go to war. i dunno what it is like in america.... but once their voted in, suddenly we dont matter anymore. it seems the government would do anything to please america. so, yes, america lead us into the war... its not like Australia, UK, spain would have even considered invading iraq until Mr Bush told them to
Funny thing is that in the US, we can't tell the government not to go to war, either. Ain't that a bitch?
Really OMG! (sarcasm)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard