The BF2s girl-problems thread

2011-02-09 08:19:12

#7126

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6626

nukchebi0 wrote:
yeah, long term relationships arent exactly the norm here. i was assuming male preferences based on that - it doesn't change the question.

long term relationships aren't the norm? wtf are you on about? "here"? college? america? your mind?

you don't sound like much of an authority on any of this stuff

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2011-02-09 08:41:02

#7127

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6479|New Haven, CT

i mean i wasn't going to name drop because then i get ostracized for doing so. i meant specifically at yale, seeing as most people are too busy to commit to anything substantial.

2011-02-09 08:50:05

#7128

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6626

what a load of bollocks. i know plenty of people in long-term relationships at oxford-cambridge, some even maintaining long-distance relationships with people at OTHER unis, so they have to travel and make all sorts of effort to see one another and sustain it. sounds like you're just making excuses for being a tad inept with girls: "oh i lack relationship experience because everybody here is too busy studying and taking part in lacrosse matches, anyway". what a crock of shit. if two people dig one another they're going to shack up, whether they're undertaking difficult studies or leading a top-tier career.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2011-02-09 09:12:49

#7129

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|6894|Toronto | Canada

i know very few people in relationships at uni, and if they do occur they rarely last more than a few months. maybe it starts becoming more common in the upper years, but its definitely not common here

2011-02-09 09:22:38

#7130

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6626

strange. over here it's pretty much 50:50 between long-term, serious, stable stuff and fucking around being an irresponsible feckless undergrad.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2011-02-09 09:43:53

#7131

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|6894|Toronto | Canada

nah, off the top of my head i cant think of a single relationship between anyone i know here.

and now that im actually thinking about it i still cant think of any. weird. its certainly nowhere near 50/50, maybe 10% in relationships at the most

2011-02-09 09:48:31

#7132

presidentsheep: Back to the Fuhrer; +208|6117|Places 'n such

None of the long distance relationships my friends had lasted more than a couple of months when one/both of them went to uni. Seemed that they'd break up, the girl in the equation would hook up with some new dude at uni and again that lasted a couple of months.
Seems weird but i've noticed it on fb about 4 or 5 times.

I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.

2011-02-09 10:19:20

#7133

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6626

one of my female housemates fell for my friend in fresher's week of her first year and they're still together now... basically living together, cooking together, sleeping together every day/night etc. /shrug. all sorts in the world i suppose. i've been in mostly long-term relationships since being at uni (including living with an other half, too), interspersed with periods of sowing wild oats and siring children the land over. so i see both sides, i guess.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2011-02-09 10:28:18

#7134

Zimmer: Un Moderador; +1,688|6911|Scotland

Uzique wrote:
what a load of bollocks. i know plenty of people in long-term relationships at oxford-cambridge

Students in Oxbridge tend to settle a lot faster than anywhere else for some reason though. Beats me as to why, but every time I've gone down there to see friends it's like a little couples village. Even in clubs people dance in couple. It's incredibly creepy.

2011-02-09 10:53:09

#7135

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6626

top institutions have the whole 'social elite' thing about them, innit... lots of match-making for reasons other than pure attraction/affinity. people want to climb social ladders and settle down asap with rich guys, classy women etc. there's a few societies and circles like that here at roho... people that already act as if they're 30 and married with kids, because they know that (high end) universities are the best place to find partners of equal or higher class that are as willing to fuck.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2011-02-09 11:04:42

#7136

presidentsheep: Back to the Fuhrer; +208|6117|Places 'n such

Fuck it, i'm coming there and bagging me a rich one.

I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.

2011-02-09 11:09:24

#7137

Camm: Feeding the Cats.; +761|5123|Dundee, Scotland.

Zimmer wrote:
Uzique wrote:
what a load of bollocks. i know plenty of people in long-term relationships at oxford-cambridge
Students in Oxbridge tend to settle a lot faster than anywhere else for some reason though. Beats me as to why, but every time I've gone down there to see friends it's like a little couples village. Even in clubs people dance in couple. It's incredibly creepy.

Me and my girl are thinking of settling down together in the summer.

for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.

2011-02-09 11:11:07

#7138

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|5857|College Park, MD

In US colleges a good portion of people aren't looking for serious, long-term relationships. At best they're usually less than a year long, flings as it were. Then there are a few schools that have a reputation for being places where people find love, and often end up marrying not long after graduating.

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg

2011-02-09 11:16:33

#7139

FFLink: There is.; +1,380|6846|Devon, England

Depends on the girl and the kind of guy she likes.

E: Hadn't refreshed in a while. This was to nuk's post.

Last edited by FFLink (2011-02-09 11:17:00)

2011-02-09 11:17:21

#7140

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6693|Long Island, New York

I've seen a lot of people here get into long term/serious relationships. Then again, it's Pace, lol!

I almost got into one with a girl earlier in the year, but we kind of distanced after winter break for whatever reason. Life goes on.

2011-02-10 06:33:00

#7141

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6626

i've always preferred long-term relationships... something stable and constant

and they ain't so bad when you're with someone like this

https://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/181567_494497116502_515001502_6504035_4004117_n.jpg

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2011-02-10 10:23:47

#7142

FFLink: There is.; +1,380|6846|Devon, England

Agreed. I've never really had a one-night stand, though. Well, sort of, but not really.

E: 6 months on Monday

Last edited by FFLink (2011-02-10 10:24:06)

2011-02-10 10:47:19

#7143

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|6894|Toronto | Canada

ive had 3 in the past month

fun, but can be awkward if you still hang out with the people after

2011-02-10 12:31:09

#7144

presidentsheep: Back to the Fuhrer; +208|6117|Places 'n such

0 in nearly 4 months.
I'm really not trying hard enough... Damn lack of money for socialising.

I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.

2011-02-10 15:30:00

#7145

HaiBai: Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me; +304|5639|Bolingbrook, Illinois

Uzique wrote:
i've always preferred long-term relationships... something stable and constant

and they ain't so bad when you're with someone like this

http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos- … 4117_n.jpg

no offense but why do you keep posting pictures of her on a gaming forum

2011-02-10 15:53:57

#7146

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,977|6787|949

Winston_Churchill wrote:
ive had 3 in the past month

fun, but can be awkward if you still hang out with the people after

weren't you a virgin a month ago?

Good for you dude. That's

HaiBai wrote:
Uzique wrote:
i've always preferred long-term relationships... something stable and constant

and they ain't so bad when you're with someone like this

http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos- … 4117_n.jpg
no offense but why do you keep posting pictures of her on a gaming forum

'cause he's happy, obviously. It's not like he's posting pics of her in a teddy and crotchless panties.

2011-02-10 15:55:36

#7147

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|6894|Toronto | Canada

err, what? lol no. not even close haha

2011-02-10 16:27:45

#7148

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6805

No offence, but it seems like every post from you in this thread is "look at me I got with someone".

2011-02-10 16:41:00

#7149

HaiBai: Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me; +304|5639|Bolingbrook, Illinois

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
HaiBai wrote:
Uzique wrote:
i've always preferred long-term relationships... something stable and constant

and they ain't so bad when you're with someone like this

http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos- … 4117_n.jpg
no offense but why do you keep posting pictures of her on a gaming forum
'cause he's happy, obviously. It's not like he's posting pics of her in a teddy and crotchless panties.

it doesn't matter, it's still weird.

"hey honey, i just posted some pictures of you on bf2s.com to show you off to my gamer buddies!"

2011-02-10 16:50:40

#7150

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6653

God, how this forum has degraded.

part of the registration process should've included an IQ test.

BF2S Forums The BF2s girl-problems thread

nukchebi0 wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

HaiBai wrote:

Uzique wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

HaiBai wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Board footer