Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6854|San Diego, CA, USA
How much can I expect them to go up?  I'm discussing this with my CPA now.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6834|Global Command
Unless you make $250000.00 per year or have a heart beat there is no reason to think your taxes will go up.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6854|San Diego, CA, USA
But all the businesses that I buy stuff from (like the Subway down the street), they'll going to raise their prices to cover these increases, right?
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7021
if he does win... he will raise taxes... and business owners will have to throttle back on new hires and raises... and the wealthy will find ways to keep their money... and people (like myself lol) who make a reasonable living will be left scratching our heads...  I'm not too fired up about McCain either... but i do like that he want's to keep the tax cuts... and he seems to understand how small and big business provide jobs and help to make an economy grow... 
the big issue now is the financial bailout which i thing is wrong...taxpayers paying for banks and wall st's gambles is not right...  I'm sure we will all survive... I just wish there was a real candidate that had nothing but the citizens wellbeing in mind... fantasy i know...lol
Love is the answer
Ender2309
has joined the GOP
+470|6876|USA

Harmor wrote:

But all the businesses that I buy stuff from (like the Subway down the street), they'll going to raise their prices to cover these increases, right?
i wouldn't expect the giant businesses to have huge price raises. its bad for business.
PureFodder
Member
+225|6591

Ender2309 wrote:

Harmor wrote:

But all the businesses that I buy stuff from (like the Subway down the street), they'll going to raise their prices to cover these increases, right?
i wouldn't expect the giant businesses to have huge price raises. its bad for business.
Yeah, if they directly pass the tax increase on to you you'll be less likely to buy their stuff which is worse for them. Better to pass some, if any, of it on and lose a bit of profit margin.

It's possible that the Dems will have sense enough to at least reverse a quarter of the Bush tax cuts and use the extra money to totally secure social security indefinately.

If they actually take steps towards some kind of socialization of healthcare you'll see a rise in taxes, but that's a good thing as the fact that you no longer have to personally pay for healthcare (of through your employer) means you'll be saving money overall.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6458|what

I think they will raise taxes or have some major cuts in spending (especially military spending).
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|7149|Reykjavík, Iceland.
I don't get it, most of Europe manages to prosper with double the percentage of taxes that you guys have

We have a 35% tax here, but being able to go to university for $300 per year and getting free health care, and more socialistic benefits is totally worth it IMO.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6716|'Murka

PureFodder wrote:

Ender2309 wrote:

Harmor wrote:

But all the businesses that I buy stuff from (like the Subway down the street), they'll going to raise their prices to cover these increases, right?
i wouldn't expect the giant businesses to have huge price raises. its bad for business.
Yeah, if they directly pass the tax increase on to you you'll be less likely to buy their stuff which is worse for them. Better to pass some, if any, of it on and lose a bit of profit margin.
That argument works for non-essential goods. For the essentials (food, clothing, utilities, etc), you can bet your ass the cost will be passed on...because it can without impacting bottomline.

PureFodder wrote:

It's possible that the Dems will have sense enough to at least reverse a quarter of the Bush tax cuts and use the extra money to totally secure social security indefinately.
But they won't have the sense to cut back on the government bloat or cut spending. Over one trillion dollars of proposed NEW spending with no mention of reducing current spending.

PureFodder wrote:

If they actually take steps towards some kind of socialization of healthcare you'll see a rise in taxes, but that's a good thing as the fact that you no longer have to personally pay for healthcare (of through your employer) means you'll be saving money overall.
Not going to happen. People will still pay for their own healthcare through their employer...others who don't will get healthcare paid for by increasing the taxes on the ones who do. Involuntary wealth redistribution ftl.

Sydney wrote:

I don't get it, most of Europe manages to prosper with double the percentage of taxes that you guys have

We have a 35% tax here, but being able to go to university for $300 per year and getting free health care, and more socialistic benefits is totally worth it IMO.
Just what makes you think that the average American pays only 17.5% tax? You're forgetting state, local, and sales tax, for starters. After all taxes are added in, the average American gives roughly 40% of their income back to the government.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
PureFodder
Member
+225|6591

FEOS wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

Ender2309 wrote:

i wouldn't expect the giant businesses to have huge price raises. its bad for business.
Yeah, if they directly pass the tax increase on to you you'll be less likely to buy their stuff which is worse for them. Better to pass some, if any, of it on and lose a bit of profit margin.
That argument works for non-essential goods. For the essentials (food, clothing, utilities, etc), you can bet your ass the cost will be passed on...because it can without impacting bottomline.
It also works for essential items if there is a resonable level of competition. Everyone has to buy clothes, but there's a lot of choice about where you buy them from and how much you are willing to spend. If your company doesn't raise prices and chooses to lose profit margin, the lost earnings can be regained by increasing market share as your stuff is cheaper than from other companies. Even with things like gas and electricity, people can usually choose to use less if prices rise.

FEOS wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

It's possible that the Dems will have sense enough to at least reverse a quarter of the Bush tax cuts and use the extra money to totally secure social security indefinately.
But they won't have the sense to cut back on the government bloat or cut spending. Over one trillion dollars of proposed NEW spending with no mention of reducing current spending.
No politicians have sense enough to cut wasteful spending.

FEOS wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

If they actually take steps towards some kind of socialization of healthcare you'll see a rise in taxes, but that's a good thing as the fact that you no longer have to personally pay for healthcare (of through your employer) means you'll be saving money overall.
Not going to happen. People will still pay for their own healthcare through their employer...others who don't will get healthcare paid for by increasing the taxes on the ones who do. Involuntary wealth redistribution ftl.
I agree that neither side seems to have much of a sensible plan to combat the spiralling healthcare costs in the US.
Havok
Nymphomaniac Treatment Specialist
+302|6980|Florida, United States

Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6926|London, England
I've always wondered what people were on about when they say that Obama means they'll have to pay more tax. Seeing as 60% (actually, a little bit more than 60%) of the USA would get a bigger tax cut under Obama than McCain. It's actually quite the opposite.

Then again, I'm guessing most people here that are Republican are somewhat elite, so they'd be better off tax-wise under McCain than Obama. If people voted based on tax than it's clearly a victory for Obama. Not quite though. It's funny because they always, always talk about how Obama = I'm gonna be taxed more.

Next time someone says that, I'm gonna be like "you must be one rich motherfucker if that's the case"
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6847|Texas - Bigger than France

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

I've always wondered what people were on about when they say that Obama means they'll have to pay more tax. Seeing as 60% (actually, a little bit more than 60%) of the USA would get a bigger tax cut under Obama than McCain. It's actually quite the opposite.

Then again, I'm guessing most people here that are Republican are somewhat elite, so they'd be better off tax-wise under McCain than Obama. If people voted based on tax than it's clearly a victory for Obama. Not quite though. It's funny because they always, always talk about how Obama = I'm gonna be taxed more.

Next time someone says that, I'm gonna be like "you must be one rich motherfucker if that's the case"
You aren't looking at the right tax targets:

http://money.cnn.com/2008/08/06/smallbu … /index.htm

and I didn't look to hard, but for businesses:
-Obama wants to roll back Bush's initiatives (including captial gains), and add some green credits.
-McCain wants to cut tax from 35% to 25%, and keep Bush's initiatives, and add some credits.

^^^
Highly simplified but...
SealXo
Member
+309|6841

ATG wrote:

Unless you make $250000.00 per year or have a heart beat there is no reason to think your taxes will go up.
wrong
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6796|Northern California
I thought that the people making $166k or more per year (the top 5%) were to be taxed?  BUt if you listen to mccain, everybody will be taxed under obama's plan...like affinity % or something..in fact, you don't even get paychecks anymore if obama is president...you just work directly for him..it's in a mccain ad I believe...
bad-man
now say you sorry
+34|6153|one windy city

ATG wrote:

Unless you make $250000.00 per year or have a heart beat there is no reason to think your taxes will go up.
sad but true
SealXo
Member
+309|6841

bad-man wrote:

ATG wrote:

Unless you make $250000.00 per year or have a heart beat there is no reason to think your taxes will go up.
sad but true
class warfare is rape on the economy.

and 100 million families have stock, and doubling the capital gains is a tax raise.

double of social security, and double of medicade.

business tax going up = rape.

my dad IS a cpa

my dads CPA/MBA > Obamas law degree

Last edited by SealXo (2008-10-01 13:39:47)

chittydog
less busy
+586|7140|Kubra, Damn it!

SealXo wrote:

bad-man wrote:

ATG wrote:

Unless you make $250000.00 per year or have a heart beat there is no reason to think your taxes will go up.
sad but true
class warfare is rape on the economy.

and 100 million families have stock, and doubling the capital gains is a tax raise.

double of social security, and double of medicade.

business tax going up = rape.

my dad IS a cpa

my dads CPA/MBA > Obamas law degree
Obama has Warren Buffett advising him.
SealXo
Member
+309|6841

chittydog wrote:

SealXo wrote:

bad-man wrote:


sad but true
class warfare is rape on the economy.

and 100 million families have stock, and doubling the capital gains is a tax raise.

double of social security, and double of medicade.

business tax going up = rape.

my dad IS a cpa

my dads CPA/MBA > Obamas law degree
Obama has Warren Buffett advising him.
more of telling him hes going to kill everyone if he doesnt listen to him
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6847|Texas - Bigger than France

SealXo wrote:

bad-man wrote:

ATG wrote:

Unless you make $250000.00 per year or have a heart beat there is no reason to think your taxes will go up.
sad but true
class warfare is rape on the economy.

and 100 million families have stock, and doubling the capital gains is a tax raise.

double of social security, and double of medicade.

business tax going up = rape.

my dad IS a cpa

my dads CPA/MBA > Obamas law degree
I'm a CPA/MBA.

The cap gains tax & estate tax issues have me concerned.  Not because of the tax it gathers, but it will impact how people distribute their wealth.

Instead of allowing the wealth transfer to happen, allowing the future generations to help with the social security issue...the tax is going to it directly.  However, I do estate planning and small-medium business planning.  So if Obama actually wins, I'll be a lot more busy than if McCain wins.  Why?  I figure out ways (legally) to reduce the amount of tax impact of whatever Obama comes up with.

But one thing to remember when you get something from your dad or another CPA...I haven't met one yet who's a democrat.
topal63
. . .
+533|7023
My effective tax rate is currently around 35%. Just because McCain says he'd like to lower that to a flat 25% doesn't even mean it is going to happen. And, personally I could care less if corporations (large ones) not little bitty ones like mine - don't get a break. I thought much of what Obama is proposing is - closing loopholes that corporations currently exploit.

Of course saying Obama is seeking to close loopholes - means he may or may not succeed. Like McCain may or may not succeed in getting a 25% corporate tax rate.

Last edited by topal63 (2008-10-01 14:02:35)

SealXo
Member
+309|6841

topal63 wrote:

My effective tax rate is currently around 35%. Just because McCain says he'd like to lower that to a flat 25% doesn't even mean it is going to happen. And, personally I could care less if corporations (large ones) not little bitty ones like mine - don't get a break. I thought much of what Obama is proposing is - closing loopholes that corporations currently exploit.

Of course saying Obama is seeking to close loopholes - means he may or may not succeed. Like McCain may or may not succeed in getting a 25% corporate tax rate.
corporations will make the money no matter what, id rather see them fucking over the governments tax revenue than passing it on to me.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6906|132 and Bush

ATG wrote:

Unless you make $250000.00 per year or have a heart beat there is no reason to think your taxes will go up.
That is correct.. the ppl making over 250k will just lay you off and ship (more) of your jobs overseas to compensate...lulz.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
topal63
. . .
+533|7023

Kmarion wrote:

ATG wrote:

Unless you make $250000.00 per year or have a heart beat there is no reason to think your taxes will go up.
That is correct.. the ppl making over 250k will just lay you off and ship (more) of your jobs overseas to compensate...lulz.
There is a ZERO point ZERO percent chance almost any small business owner - like myself - is going overseas; that includes employees and or looking for employees. I'd just like the bottom to get here sooner - so a real recovery can happen.

_____

I am not sure if I understand you (SealXo) perfectly?

Are you saying:
1.) You think corporations are going to make shit-loads of money regardless of who's in the oval office? I think I'd agree with that, more or less.
2.) And, you would like these corporations to pay as little tax as possible? Fuck the federal government and it's tax revenue. Which means any services tied to those revenues?
3.) "... than passing it on to me." I don't understand that part.

Last edited by topal63 (2008-10-01 14:25:40)

SealXo
Member
+309|6841

topal63 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

ATG wrote:

Unless you make $250000.00 per year or have a heart beat there is no reason to think your taxes will go up.
That is correct.. the ppl making over 250k will just lay you off and ship (more) of your jobs overseas to compensate...lulz.
There is a ZERO point ZERO percent chance almost any small business owner - like myself - is going overseas; that includes employees and or looking for employees. I'd just like the bottom to get here sooner - so a real recovery can happen.

_____

I am not sure if I understand you (SealXo) perfectly?

Are you saying:
1.) You think corporations are going to make shit-loads of money regardless of who's in the oval office? I think I'd agree with that, more or less.
2.) And, you would like these corporations to pay as little tax as possible? Fuck the federal government and it's tax revenue. Which means any services tied to those revenues?
3.) "... than passing it on to me." I don't understand that part.
yes, because

if you read a business book about corporations they say there is no such thing as corporate taxe, because if they get taxed they will basically just inflate there service or products prices. So the corporations don't really end up paying the corporate taxes, we do, because they just pass the tax down to my when i buy there service or product.


AND i believe you wont be going overseas. I don't know about you, but a lot of small business's are barely hanging on right now, so increasing your taxes and your business's taxes, you won't be shipping overseas, youll just be closing your doors. Either way, jobs lost

Last edited by SealXo (2008-10-01 14:31:30)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard