Research done by yours truly.
Research done by yours truly.
You fire more rounds with better fps. I thought this was pretty common knowledge (and pretty debated in another thread here too).
Certain FPS gives you faster fire rates, jump higher, run faster, and 333 fps makes you run silently.TheAussieReaper wrote:
You fire more rounds with better fps. I thought this was pretty common knowledge (and pretty debated in another thread here too).
This video just proves that 17 is a sweet spot.
Yeah but 17 is a shit FPS while 30 is quite playable.Sir Schmoopy wrote:
Certain FPS gives you faster fire rates, jump higher, run faster, and 333 fps makes you run silently.TheAussieReaper wrote:
You fire more rounds with better fps. I thought this was pretty common knowledge (and pretty debated in another thread here too).
This video just proves that 17 is a sweet spot.
I go mad with any FPS under 80.
Same.Sydney wrote:
I go mad with any FPS under 80.
I keep mine at 125.
125 is one of the best sweetspots.CrazeD wrote:
Same.Sydney wrote:
I go mad with any FPS under 80.
I keep mine at 125.
17 is still really playable. Try using a computer that can't achieve a constant >40. Now you know how I feel.
But the human eye sees around 60fps though after that the perception of reality then starts to blur around the edges. But the human eye can see at over 300fps but at that level there is to much info for the brain to take in it just concentrates on the point you are looking at that moment so you get a kind of tunnel vision, you lose your periphral vision at such speeds.
Last edited by smuder201 (2008-09-20 10:49:14)
Quote of the year so far "Fifa 11 on the other hand... shiny things for mongos "-mtb0minime
The higher the FPS is, the less your eyes notice the increase. 17 looks much different from 30 where as between 30 and 60 it's all but unnoticeable.smuder201 wrote:
But the human eye sees around 60fps though after that the perception of reality then starts to blur around the edges. But the human eye can see at over 300fps but at that level there is to much info for the brain to take in it just concentrates on the point you are looking at that moment so you get a kind of tunnel vision, you lose your periphral vision at such speeds.
yup basically all these FPS whores basically are stopping their eyes working to there optimum. Its making them have tunnel vision.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
The higher the FPS is, the less your eyes notice the increase. 17 looks much different from 30 where as between 30 and 60 it's all but unnoticeable.
Quote of the year so far "Fifa 11 on the other hand... shiny things for mongos "-mtb0minime
The eye sees at 30, not 60.
That's why XBox games are programmed to run at 60 FPS, because when there are explosions or such, it drops under 60, but never under 30. If they had it at 30 it would be noticeable when there were graphically demanding frames, as the FPS would drop to 25 or 20.
That's why XBox games are programmed to run at 60 FPS, because when there are explosions or such, it drops under 60, but never under 30. If they had it at 30 it would be noticeable when there were graphically demanding frames, as the FPS would drop to 25 or 20.
125 and 255 are the best fps locks. People also forget about Maxpackets which actually affect your reg.
Promod locks your maxpackets at 100 so....Johnny_Extremer wrote:
125 and 255 are the best fps locks. People also forget about Maxpackets which actually affect your reg.
how do you lock your fps in cod?
/com_maxfps #
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 
Beat me to it.Mutantsteak wrote:
/com_maxfps #
It also says in the video description.
Spoiler (highlight to read):Sir Schmoopy wrote:
Beat me to it.Mutantsteak wrote:
/com_maxfps #
It also says in the video description.
Thats where i got it
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Hehehe.Mutantsteak wrote:
Spoiler (highlight to read):Sir Schmoopy wrote:
Beat me to it.Mutantsteak wrote:
/com_maxfps #
It also says in the video description.
Thats where i got it
Eyes see between 30-60fps there actualy is no set limit as i said earlier they can see upto 300fps every eye is different, people say that the eye sees at 30fps because that is what most tv & film is set around 24-30 fps.Sir Schmoopy wrote:
The eye sees at 30, not 60.
That's why XBox games are programmed to run at 60 FPS, because when there are explosions or such, it drops under 60, but never under 30. If they had it at 30 it would be noticeable when there were graphically demanding frames, as the FPS would drop to 25 or 20.
Quote of the year so far "Fifa 11 on the other hand... shiny things for mongos "-mtb0minime
It's known that the game engine has fps weak spots..
#rekt
So.... Thats ideal for either FPS lock.Lynx14 wrote:
Promod locks your maxpackets at 100 so....Johnny_Extremer wrote:
125 and 255 are the best fps locks. People also forget about Maxpackets which actually affect your reg.
Why do people keep bringing this retarded argument into these FPS threads?smuder201 wrote:
But the human eye sees around 60fps though after that the perception of reality then starts to blur around the edges. But the human eye can see at over 300fps but at that level there is to much info for the brain to take in it just concentrates on the point you are looking at that moment so you get a kind of tunnel vision, you lose your periphral vision at such speeds.
It is entirely irrelevant, because the monitor doesn't display at 125 (or whatever) FPS.
And I'm sorry, I can notice a difference between 17 and 30FPS, between 30 and 60FPS, and between 60 and 125FPS. There is quite a noticeable difference.
Obviously between 17 and 30, maybe between 30 and 60, but between 60 and 125 would be hard to see. Impossible between 90 and 125.CrazeD wrote:
Why do people keep bringing this retarded argument into these FPS threads?smuder201 wrote:
But the human eye sees around 60fps though after that the perception of reality then starts to blur around the edges. But the human eye can see at over 300fps but at that level there is to much info for the brain to take in it just concentrates on the point you are looking at that moment so you get a kind of tunnel vision, you lose your periphral vision at such speeds.
It is entirely irrelevant, because the monitor doesn't display at 125 (or whatever) FPS.
And I'm sorry, I can notice a difference between 17 and 30FPS, between 30 and 60FPS, and between 60 and 125FPS. There is quite a noticeable difference.
I capped mine at 43 (a sweetspot) then uncapped it for a round, and yes I did notice a difference, when it was bouncing up to 60. But it was up and down so much that I was lagging, so I capped it at 43 again. Just works better.
I can feel the difference in smoothness from 125, and at 80. 40-60FPS is not playable for me, too choppy. I don't care what your eye can see, because it doesn't matter.
And I get 38 fps on a good day in COD 4.
Geez, hope I get that 4870 soon.
Geez, hope I get that 4870 soon.