Too soon to think about this?
Too late for anyone to control.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Thats a doomsday scenario right?
Al Gore can be Hilary's VP candidate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78bee/78beeb000139f0d5d6c3caf1415cd42d5fac00dc" alt="https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png"
No way. We've seen how Palin handles herself in interviews. As a VP she has a chance because her views are generally less important than those of the Presidential candidate, but she'd get slaughtered in the debates.
EDIT: And I'd rather hope not about Hillary. I have a feeling her overly aggressiveness this time round might have put a lot of people off her.
EDIT: And I'd rather hope not about Hillary. I have a feeling her overly aggressiveness this time round might have put a lot of people off her.
Last edited by ghettoperson (2008-09-14 04:59:56)
possible if McCain dies in office, but I can see Obama running against her more successfully.
Lets see who will wind the vp debate shall we?ghettoperson wrote:
No way. We've seen how Palin handles herself in interviews. As a VP she has a chance because her views are generally less important than those of the Presidential candidate, but she'd get slaughtered in the debates.
EDIT: And I'd rather hope not about Hillary. I have a feeling her overly aggressiveness this time round might have put a lot of people off her.
Edit: I took a day break to play some tf2 and dod:s and here is the amount I have to read, yikes.
Last edited by War Man (2008-09-14 23:38:01)
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
As stated in another thread where someone made a similar statement:ghettoperson wrote:
No way. We've seen how Palin handles herself in interviews. As a VP she has a chance because her views are generally less important than those of the Presidential candidate, but she'd get slaughtered in the debates.
EDIT: And I'd rather hope not about Hillary. I have a feeling her overly aggressiveness this time round might have put a lot of people off her.
You come to this conclusion after a single interview? She's had one interview with Charlie Gibson that was broadcast over several nights and programs. One interview. But she can't handle herself in interviews.
/facepalm
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
She couldn't handle a simple Question and Answer format. There was a point where it was a Yes or No question...couldn't do it. A small fiber of my being felt a bit sorry for her, but I snapped back to sanity soon enoughFEOS wrote:
As stated in another thread where someone made a similar statement:
You come to this conclusion after a single interview? She's had one interview with Charlie Gibson that was broadcast over several nights and programs. One interview. But she can't handle herself in interviews.
/facepalm
Jesus Christ is this Obama vs. McCain or Obama vs. Palin?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
And again...how is that any different than the other three people running?TrueMusou wrote:
She couldn't handle a simple Question and Answer format. There was a point where it was a Yes or No question...couldn't do it. A small fiber of my being felt a bit sorry for her, but I snapped back to sanity soon enoughFEOS wrote:
As stated in another thread where someone made a similar statement:
You come to this conclusion after a single interview? She's had one interview with Charlie Gibson that was broadcast over several nights and programs. One interview. But she can't handle herself in interviews.
/facepalm
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Of course I can make an assumption based on one interview. I came to this conclusion because it's all the evidence I have to go on right now. At the moment, in the only interview I have seen of her she performed terribly. So 100% of the time so far to my knowledge, she has sucked in interviews. Yes, perhaps that is premature judgement of her, but until I see something to prove otherwise she's crap at them.FEOS wrote:
As stated in another thread where someone made a similar statement:ghettoperson wrote:
No way. We've seen how Palin handles herself in interviews. As a VP she has a chance because her views are generally less important than those of the Presidential candidate, but she'd get slaughtered in the debates.
EDIT: And I'd rather hope not about Hillary. I have a feeling her overly aggressiveness this time round might have put a lot of people off her.
You come to this conclusion after a single interview? She's had one interview with Charlie Gibson that was broadcast over several nights and programs. One interview. But she can't handle herself in interviews.
/facepalm
/facepalm
Had Obama only done one interview and performed as she had you've have been all over it.
Obama is going to be in office until 2016, shut up.
No I wouldn't have. Because a single interview is not enough to say "how X handles himself/herself in interviews." I'd wait and see how they did in multiple interviews and debates before I started deciding how capable they were.ghettoperson wrote:
Of course I can make an assumption based on one interview. I came to this conclusion because it's all the evidence I have to go on right now. At the moment, in the only interview I have seen of her she performed terribly. So 100% of the time so far to my knowledge, she has sucked in interviews. Yes, perhaps that is premature judgement of her, but until I see something to prove otherwise she's crap at them.FEOS wrote:
As stated in another thread where someone made a similar statement:ghettoperson wrote:
No way. We've seen how Palin handles herself in interviews. As a VP she has a chance because her views are generally less important than those of the Presidential candidate, but she'd get slaughtered in the debates.
EDIT: And I'd rather hope not about Hillary. I have a feeling her overly aggressiveness this time round might have put a lot of people off her.
You come to this conclusion after a single interview? She's had one interview with Charlie Gibson that was broadcast over several nights and programs. One interview. But she can't handle herself in interviews.
/facepalm
/facepalm
Had Obama only done one interview and performed as she had you've have been all over it.
And she didn't suck at that interview any more than any other candidate sucked at any interview. There were high and low points for her, just as there were high and low points for Obama, Biden, and McCain in their various interviews.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
This better involve a pit filled with mud and cold beers.
She sucked terribly. IMO she was far worse than any of the others. Anyway, my point is as of this moment she's crap that them. When I see a new interview, I may change my assessment.FEOS wrote:
No I wouldn't have. Because a single interview is not enough to say "how X handles himself/herself in interviews." I'd wait and see how they did in multiple interviews and debates before I started deciding how capable they were.ghettoperson wrote:
Of course I can make an assumption based on one interview. I came to this conclusion because it's all the evidence I have to go on right now. At the moment, in the only interview I have seen of her she performed terribly. So 100% of the time so far to my knowledge, she has sucked in interviews. Yes, perhaps that is premature judgement of her, but until I see something to prove otherwise she's crap at them.FEOS wrote:
As stated in another thread where someone made a similar statement:
You come to this conclusion after a single interview? She's had one interview with Charlie Gibson that was broadcast over several nights and programs. One interview. But she can't handle herself in interviews.
/facepalm
/facepalm
Had Obama only done one interview and performed as she had you've have been all over it.
And she didn't suck at that interview any more than any other candidate sucked at any interview. There were high and low points for her, just as there were high and low points for Obama, Biden, and McCain in their various interviews.