FROM MY FULL-HD TV
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g76/m … orlulz.png
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g76/m … orlulz.png
Last edited by blah (2008-08-29 15:07:10)
Last edited by blah (2008-08-29 15:07:10)
all you need usually is an rgb cable i think, thats how i used to torrent...buy.... films from the internet and watch then on a plasma screenObiwan wrote:
Nice, was it hard to set up ?
not at all,I bought today a DVI(male) to HDMI(female) adapter and 2m HDMI(male/male) cable.Obiwan wrote:
Nice, was it hard to set up ?
Last edited by Obiwan (2008-08-29 15:22:22)
When I play games that my computer can usually run,fps is the same.Not many games can run on 1920*1080,so I play on 1280*1024 and I don't see any quality loss except stretched screen a little bit.Obiwan wrote:
I've done this to my projector so I guess it's basically the same thing then right ? I've never thought about hooking it up to a regular tv.
How is your FPS on that tv or is it the same ?
totally,I don't get any HD channels even on satellite.r'Eeee wrote:
My TV would be collecting dust, without the PS3. It's pretty sad they are selling HDTV's, while having only few HD channels.
Last edited by blah (2008-08-29 15:37:55)
i have plenty of HD channelsr'Eeee wrote:
My TV would be collecting dust, without the PS3. It's pretty sad they are selling HDTV's, while having only few HD channels.
Fuck I just zoomed this picture in on my tiny sub notebook.
Go fap to your projector. Jeez.Freezer7Pro wrote:
What's so spectacular about that? Many people have HD and up resolutions. Would have been spectacular two years ago.
I didn't mean it like that. I meant that monitors and TVs capable of displaying HD+ have become so cheap that almost anyone can get one. $300-$400 isn't exactly a huge investment. A couple of years ago, those monitors/TVs would be $1000+.naightknifar wrote:
Go fap to your projector. Jeez.Freezer7Pro wrote:
What's so spectacular about that? Many people have HD and up resolutions. Would have been spectacular two years ago.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2008-08-30 03:27:29)
Yes it isFreezer7Pro wrote:
I didn't mean it like that. I meant that monitors and TVs capable of displaying HD+ have become so cheap that almost anyone can get one. $300-$400 isn't exactly a huge investment. A couple of years ago, those monitors/TVs would be $1000+.naightknifar wrote:
Go fap to your projector. Jeez.Freezer7Pro wrote:
What's so spectacular about that? Many people have HD and up resolutions. Would have been spectacular two years ago.
STFU Mek, you are arguing with Freezer ffs.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
Yes it isFreezer7Pro wrote:
I didn't mean it like that. I meant that monitors and TVs capable of displaying HD+ have become so cheap that almost anyone can get one. $300-$400 isn't exactly a huge investment. A couple of years ago, those monitors/TVs would be $1000+.naightknifar wrote:
Go fap to your projector. Jeez.
It's an investment, but not a huge investment.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
Damn if I'd let someone say that spending $300-400 isn't a huge investment