| Like it | 72% | 72% - 39 | ||||
| Hate it | 27% | 27% - 15 | ||||
| Total: 54 | ||||||
Only when I need to back up my opinion.God Save the Queen wrote:
someone thinks Im talking about them specifically....
lowing, give me a break. most of your OP's get sourced from obscure blogging sites. Again, I wasnt even thinking of you with my post, but since you volunteered yourself as an example for the google ranger, I am now.yes you are.lowing wrote:
Sorry
hi.lowing wrote:
I do not ( hardly) attack anyone.
Are you serious?Iowing wrote:
"arrogant and bigoted". I can understand how you can call my posts arrogant, but where in the world did you get bigoted from?
I do not ( hardly) attack anyone. In fact if you read, I am usually the one bombarded with attacks.
That's a textbook-example depiction of ignorant bigotry at its finest. I'm going to have to add to your prescribed reading list and place the Dictionary in the 'must-read' section along with all the classical liberal literature by founders such as Wilhelm Von Humboldt. And hey, if I'm arrogant, at least my posts aren't hilariously contradictive.Iowing wrote:
I do not blame ya, if I were a liberal, I wouldn't want to try and defend my lies, and fantasyland bullshit either.
lol, my man parker, wanna talk about self defense............again?Parker wrote:
hi.lowing wrote:
I do not ( hardly) attack anyone.
@OP,
i would be willing to throw down with someone....
i mean, there are only a few topics that i would be able to debate about, cause most of them i dont give a fuck about.
if someone wants to throw down about firearms, i would be game though
lowing,lowing wrote:
lol, my man parker, wanna talk about self defense............again?Parker wrote:
hi.lowing wrote:
I do not ( hardly) attack anyone.
@OP,
i would be willing to throw down with someone....
i mean, there are only a few topics that i would be able to debate about, cause most of them i dont give a fuck about.
if someone wants to throw down about firearms, i would be game though
Last edited by Parker (2008-08-25 12:04:47)
Yup I am serious.Uzique wrote:
Are you serious?Iowing wrote:
"arrogant and bigoted". I can understand how you can call my posts arrogant, but where in the world did you get bigoted from?
I do not ( hardly) attack anyone. In fact if you read, I am usually the one bombarded with attacks.That's a textbook-example depiction of ignorant bigotry at its finest. I'm going to have to add to your prescribed reading list and place the Dictionary in the 'must-read' section along with all the classical liberal literature by founders such as Wilhelm Von Humboldt. And hey, if I'm arrogant, at least my posts aren't hilariously contradictive.Iowing wrote:
I do not blame ya, if I were a liberal, I wouldn't want to try and defend my lies, and fantasyland bullshit either.
qftGod Save the Queen wrote:
theyve proven they know how to use google.
fair enough, I will never mention how you can pry my DVD Player from my cold dead hands.Parker wrote:
lowing,lowing wrote:
lol, my man parker, wanna talk about self defense............again?Parker wrote:
hi.
@OP,
i would be willing to throw down with someone....
i mean, there are only a few topics that i would be able to debate about, cause most of them i dont give a fuck about.
if someone wants to throw down about firearms, i would be game though
ill talk about self defense all day long....however, i do not wish to discuss television and dvd player defense anymore
edit:
stop copying my karma, weirdo...
Dude... just stop. You're honestly just making yourself look like an ass (for the millionth time)lowing wrote:
Yup I am serious.Uzique wrote:
Are you serious?Iowing wrote:
"arrogant and bigoted". I can understand how you can call my posts arrogant, but where in the world did you get bigoted from?
I do not ( hardly) attack anyone. In fact if you read, I am usually the one bombarded with attacks.That's a textbook-example depiction of ignorant bigotry at its finest. I'm going to have to add to your prescribed reading list and place the Dictionary in the 'must-read' section along with all the classical liberal literature by founders such as Wilhelm Von Humboldt. And hey, if I'm arrogant, at least my posts aren't hilariously contradictive.Iowing wrote:
I do not blame ya, if I were a liberal, I wouldn't want to try and defend my lies, and fantasyland bullshit either.
This was not a personal attack, it iwas an attack against liberalism. Try and keep up and stop being so sensative. I know it will be hard since not hurting someones feelings and Political Correctness is a must for liberalism to take hold.
Fixed.usmarine wrote:
qftGod Save the Queen wrote:
theyve proven they know how to use Wikipedia and Google.
lol, yeah, believing in, and exercising in personal responsibility, and not wanting the govt. to do it for me.........How crazy is THAT??!!Spearhead wrote:
Dude... just stop. You're honestly just making yourself look like an ass (for the millionth time)lowing wrote:
Yup I am serious.Uzique wrote:
Are you serious?Iowing wrote:
"arrogant and bigoted". I can understand how you can call my posts arrogant, but where in the world did you get bigoted from?
I do not ( hardly) attack anyone. In fact if you read, I am usually the one bombarded with attacks.
That's a textbook-example depiction of ignorant bigotry at its finest. I'm going to have to add to your prescribed reading list and place the Dictionary in the 'must-read' section along with all the classical liberal literature by founders such as Wilhelm Von Humboldt. And hey, if I'm arrogant, at least my posts aren't hilariously contradictive.
This was not a personal attack, it iwas an attack against liberalism. Try and keep up and stop being so sensative. I know it will be hard since not hurting someones feelings and Political Correctness is a must for liberalism to take hold.
Maybe you are "usually the one bombarded with attacks" is because you do not fit in with mainstream beliefs. As in, you're nuts.
No, you're telling us that its impossible to be personally responsible for yourself and be a liberal at the same time.lowing wrote:
lol, yeah, believing in, and exercising in personal responsibility, and not wanting the govt. to do it for me.........How crazy is THAT??!!
Hmmmm, let me think......You want the govt. to control education, your money, your salary caps, your medical, your retirment........Yup pretty much you want the mantal of responsibility removed from you and placed in the hands of the govt.....So pretty much yup, you do not want the responsibility of governing yourself, and your own decisionsSpearhead wrote:
No, you're telling us that its impossible to be personally responsible for yourself and be a liberal at the same time.lowing wrote:
lol, yeah, believing in, and exercising in personal responsibility, and not wanting the govt. to do it for me.........How crazy is THAT??!!
No no, you still don't get it.lowing wrote:
Yup I am serious.
This was not a personal attack, it iwas an attack against liberalism. Try and keep up and stop being so sensative. I know it will be hard since not hurting someones feelings and Political Correctness is a must for liberalism to take hold.
Yeah, being 42 years old and working my whole life for my family and my possessions and seeing what is around me has nothing to do with it, watching my tax dollars get drained in funding for people that only expect and demand more, so the seek to elect ANYONE who promises more of my money... .Life experience has nothing to do with it I base all of my opinions on blogs.Uzique wrote:
No no, you still don't get it.lowing wrote:
Yup I am serious.
This was not a personal attack, it iwas an attack against liberalism. Try and keep up and stop being so sensative. I know it will be hard since not hurting someones feelings and Political Correctness is a must for liberalism to take hold.
17th/18th century liberalism (i.e. the original stuff, the classical stuff) is far different from modern liberalism. I support the classical form.
I'm afraid they didn't have 'political correctness' in Adam Smith's day.
Every post you produce simply makes you seem more ignorant and uneducated than the last, it's almost as if those biased propaganda-blogs are your only form of intelligence and information.
Occasionally gs chimes in with a win.God Save the Queen wrote:
somalia is a libertarian paradise
THAT.lowing wrote:
Yeah, being 42 years old and working my whole life for my family and my possessions and seeing what is around me has nothing to do with it, watching my tax dollars get drained in funding for people that only expect and demand more, so the seek to elect ANYONE who promises more of my money... .Life experience has nothing to do with it I base all of my opinions on blogs.Uzique wrote:
No no, you still don't get it.lowing wrote:
Yup I am serious.
This was not a personal attack, it iwas an attack against liberalism. Try and keep up and stop being so sensative. I know it will be hard since not hurting someones feelings and Political Correctness is a must for liberalism to take hold.
17th/18th century liberalism (i.e. the original stuff, the classical stuff) is far different from modern liberalism. I support the classical form.
I'm afraid they didn't have 'political correctness' in Adam Smith's day.
Every post you produce simply makes you seem more ignorant and uneducated than the last, it's almost as if those biased propaganda-blogs are your only form of intelligence and information.
IUzique wrote:
THAT.lowing wrote:
Yeah, being 42 years old and working my whole life for my family and my possessions and seeing what is around me has nothing to do with it, watching my tax dollars get drained in funding for people that only expect and demand more, so the seek to elect ANYONE who promises more of my money... .Life experience has nothing to do with it I base all of my opinions on blogs.Uzique wrote:
No no, you still don't get it.
17th/18th century liberalism (i.e. the original stuff, the classical stuff) is far different from modern liberalism. I support the classical form.
I'm afraid they didn't have 'political correctness' in Adam Smith's day.
Every post you produce simply makes you seem more ignorant and uneducated than the last, it's almost as if those biased propaganda-blogs are your only form of intelligence and information.
IS.
NOT.
CLASSICAL.
LIBERALISM.
IT'S.
AMERICAN.
LIBERALISM.
No not really, just replace liberal with labor in all of my posts and the problem will be solved.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Lowing only knows about American liberalism.
If I told him that the right wing Australian political party were known as Liberals, and the left leaning were known as Labor, his tiny little head would explode.
