lol yeaPoseidon wrote:
dealKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
'If' the Jets were good you would have an argument.
'If' the Jets beat the Colts I'll ban myself for as long as you want.
although that deal would be even sweeter if you banned FM instead of yourself
How about a 24 hour ban for me if the jets loose, and 24 hours for you if they win.Poseidon wrote:
dealKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
'If' the Jets were good you would have an argument.
'If' the Jets beat the Colts I'll ban myself for as long as you want.
although that deal would be even sweeter if you banned FM instead of yourself
fixtDauntless wrote:
How about a 24 hour ban for me Poseidon if the jets loose, and 24 hours for you if they win.
And actually the Chargers (read: Kaeding) have a history of missing field goals in the playoffs. More of the same.ghettoperson wrote:
Except field goals are rarely missed, so it's more than just a bit of a cockup on the Chargers part to fuck up three of them.Poseidon wrote:
yeah yeah, "if" kaeding hit those 3 field goals then the chargers would have wonKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Credit is due? You should be thanking Kaeding and the Chargers...that's about as much credit is due. Chargers were overrated, beating up on the AFC West is no great task to write home about. The Jets defense definitely played a part in stopping the Chargers, but the Chargers played a far bigger part in stopping themselves. Penalties and missed field goals. Bottom line. The Jets are the shittiest team in the playoffs, something I would have said before the weekend games.
I don't claim to know everything about football. I also hate the Chargers with a passion.
PS - 'real rhetoric' lel.
and if a frog had longer legs it wouldn't bump it's ass when it hopped
"ifs" don't make a very good argument.
i knew ken didn't have the balls
What are you on about? Go drown in a puddle. merrily frolick down Gay Street.Dauntless wrote:
i knew ken didn't have the balls
ok. The forums are better off without you anyway.Dauntless wrote:
How about a 24 hour ban for me if the jets loose, and 24 hours for you if they win.Poseidon wrote:
dealKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
'If' the Jets were good you would have an argument.
'If' the Jets beat the Colts I'll ban myself for as long as you want.
although that deal would be even sweeter if you banned FM instead of yourself
i still like the "ban flaming maniac regardless of the outcome" option
Jets at Colts
10 to 23
Vikings at Saints
27 to 30
10 to 23
Vikings at Saints
27 to 30
vikes will lose to n.o. tomorrow.....why you ask?
the prince fight song. no joke. go google and enjoy.
the prince fight song. no joke. go google and enjoy.
That was ridiculous.11 Bravo wrote:
vikes will lose to n.o. tomorrow.....why you ask?
the prince fight song. no joke. go google and enjoy.
i'm asking why you bother with this thread, traitor.11 Bravo wrote:
why you ask?
24 January 2010 20:00:00 GMT
for fuck sake
what do you want
you to get out of the American football thread, you dirty foreigner
hope you enjoyed the second quarter, jets fans . . .
hey new york, you like apples?
And the dagger plunged into the heart of the phony Cinderella, finally bringing to a long-awaited end that which had never deserved to exist.
fixtnukchebi0 wrote:
how do you like them apples?
sorry pos
yeah well...
fuck you all especially ken
fuck you all especially ken
fucking eurofags...burnzz wrote:
you to get out of the American football thread, you dirty foreigner
yeah, who does that 11 bravo think he is, "football better than throwball" and all?Dauntless wrote:
fucking eurofags...
hardy har har
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"