BF2S Forums My conflict between what I believe and what is acceptable

ATG wrote:

lowing wrote:

Ratzinger wrote:

Amused as fuck by the assertation that Christianity is non-violent. Anyone want to come to a stoning? REAL Christians reject the first testament, do they?

You're babbling Lowing, AND laughingly referring to double standards while denying the violence inherent in rejecting all other teachings.

Your delusions and theirs are equally valid.

I think I made it clear that people committing violence in the name of Christ are NOT practicing Christianity....regardless as to their claims.

Violence in the name of Christianity is hypocritcal because it is not what is taught in the words of Christ.

Violence in the name of Islam unfortuantely is consistent with the teachings of Muhammad

So when Jesus told his followers to tip over the money changers tables he wasn't advocating violence?

LOL, and act of emotion against a table? Compared to Muhammad and his acts of violence against 600 heads that he felt needed to be removed?

ATG, are you seriously gunna use that?

I am not religious, not one bit. but the truth is, the word of Christ has set a goal so high that no human could possibly attain it, they can only try, and ask for forgiveness when they fail, which is how they will be judged.

the violent teachings of Muhammad can easily be attained and has been proven several times by both so called Christians and Muslims a like throught history.

There is your difference

Last edited by lowing (2008-07-14 06:37:10)

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

Jesus is like a hardcore socialist/communist/anti-capitalist

Yup.

And then the church came along and ruined everything.