IIRC, the major difference between the IRL duel and the movie seems to be the establishment of a prior relationship between the rapist and the husband and raped wife. Also the loser got stabbed in a different place. In the movie he took a knife through the mouth. IRL he took it through the throat.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
An Affleck interview has pretty much set the tone for what I expect:"Historical truth wouldn't have served the narrative needs," suggests to me that the movie is a highly fictionalized cherry pick.latimes wrote:
“So it wasn’t so much about hewing fastidiously to historical truth, because that wouldn’t have served the narrative needs we were as interested in, as much as illuminating the fact that the vestiges of the sexism and misogyny of the patriarchy we live with now come from a place that was Western civilization’s codified value system.”
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-a … leck-damon
The article goes on to state that the movie is "at least 75% accurate," which is hugely not useful in terms of historical viewing without a lot of disclaimer and supplementary material like an historian's commentary/caption track or even a lecture.
This genre is all like "based on a true story!" and I'm sitting here like "bAsEd oN a TrUe StOrY," and then people watch it thinking they might have learned something but a quarter or more of it could be complete and utter fabrication for "narrative needs."
Like Chernobyl.
Dislike.
![https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg)