IMDB lists it as simply
Genres: Crime | Drama
Genres: Crime | Drama
since when did IMDB use advanced generic tags?AussieReaper wrote:
IMDB lists it as simply
Genres: Crime | Drama
Baddie Denzel-Sh1fty- wrote:
Training Day
/10
AussieReaper wrote:
black and white = neo-noir direction and stylingUzique wrote:
love the neo-noir direction and styling.
he always puts entertaining things in the post a pic threadUzique wrote:
what i like about you is that you somehow think it's worth congratulating yourself over putting such shitty bait out in the first place
honestly the last 4 posts of yours are so worthless. not even entertaining 'trolling'.
you're doing the 'being a purposeful dumbass' act as if its original, or as if we already dont have a shifty/warman
GREAT JOB!
Aussie rules the Ass Appreciation ThreadKimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
he always puts entertaining things in the post a pic threadUzique wrote:
what i like about you is that you somehow think it's worth congratulating yourself over putting such shitty bait out in the first place
honestly the last 4 posts of yours are so worthless. not even entertaining 'trolling'.
you're doing the 'being a purposeful dumbass' act as if its original, or as if we already dont have a shifty/warman
GREAT JOB!
qftWinston_Churchill wrote:
The Town - 6/10
Wow, I thought this was supposed to be really good...? It had an interesting premise but not so well executed. And it just went on forever and ever... and drifted away from the storyline too much. It was bearable to watch but really not that good at all.
Last edited by Macbeth (2010-12-16 15:19:57)
"What the fuck's your problem?"M.O.A.B wrote:
Baddie Denzel-Sh1fty- wrote:
Training Day
/10
Last edited by -Sh1fty- (2010-12-17 00:12:33)
Gone Baby Gone was his directing debut. I taught they were both deadly, he's a better director than actor lolMacbeth wrote:
I thought the Town was pretty good. Maybe it's because of how familiar it is to HEAT.
On an interesting sidenote, it was Ben affleck's directing debut. So yay for him.
The gap in technology is entirely irrelevant. The original TRON movie, even with all of the technobabble, had an incredibly weak story.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Um...TECH GAP?!
The entire concept of Tron is a wholly unrealistic jumble of nonsense that calls for complete suspension of disbelief. Its strength was in the visuals, not the story.mikkel wrote:
The gap in technology is entirely irrelevant. The original TRON movie, even with all of the technobabble, had an incredibly weak story.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Um...TECH GAP?!
Last edited by justice (2010-12-17 19:22:50)
A story grounded in fiction does not need to be a story grounded in inanity. To dismiss the story of TRON because the movie was carried by the visuals is to dismiss the the potential of the concept, which TRON: Legacy most certainly proves to go way beyond what TRON delivered.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
The entire concept of Tron is a wholly unrealistic jumble of nonsense that calls for complete suspension of disbelief. Its strength was in the visuals, not the story.mikkel wrote:
The gap in technology is entirely irrelevant. The original TRON movie, even with all of the technobabble, had an incredibly weak story.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Um...TECH GAP?!