morbesso666 wrote:
unnamednewbie13 wrote:
I'm not going to lie. This is a direct insult from an irritated reader. From what little I've read of Morbesso666's stuff, it strikes me as an arrogant, self-centered snit who does little in the way of respecting anyone elses opinions, demands answers that people don't have to give, and gets pissed off if they don't say what it wants them to say.
Summary of this Thread:
morbesso666 wrote:
I ask noob questions. I also hate countries that have a cross shape in their flag and/or military awards. And I especially hate America for allowing such a thing as Christianity rear its ugly head to the rest of the world.
1. Going "waaaa! answer my question!" on an informal forum in a direct and confrontational manner won't get you anywhere.
2. Would you prefer if we replaced everything that smacked of a cross shape with goat skulls, demonic runes and number 666? Well, if we did, a variety of similar shapes in science and the media would be immediately rendered useless. And while we could still dot our i's, God (ooooh, I said God) forbid that we dare to cross our t's.
3. Seriously, getting on someone's case because they had the gall to mention the word "Christmas," associated with a statement like "looking forward to" smacks a bit of the extreme. What are you, some sort of Israeli fascist?
4. The comparison US to Nazi Germany has been, is, and always will be a ludicrous concept. If you don't know why, go back and crack open a non-filtered history book that hasn't been issued to you by your school.
5. Hmm, maybe the world would be a happier place if we all just stood in one place motionless, trying not to say or do anything that would disturb anyone else. Or maybe we can develop the technology to hook everyone's brain up to a massively-parallel hive mind akin to the Borg Collective.
Religion is irrelevant. Grammar is futile.
...I'm going to add one quick question to the mix: what exactly does the word "infrenting" mean?
1. Ok I won't answer seriously your comments, since I see you're infantile by "1.".
2. Most of "2." is BS. Just rephrase the last sentence.
3. No. Just proving what I wrote in my previous posts. That it is indeed meant to christianity.
4. Same as "3.". Just to prove my point, not to compare. If you don't know what I'm talking about read the dialogue in the previous posts.
5. I didn't claim anything, make USA christian, I don't give a shit on you. Make a workship to a human being, I don't care either. I just doubted the religiouslessness of USA, didn't say it's wrong, because as I said, I'll gently say I couldn't care less about USA (Stop calling USA, America BTW).
First I'll have you know that I haven't fallen into anti-semitism. I plainly don't care what religion someone belongs to, so long as it doesn't propagate throwing babby rabbits into a raging inferno or something along those lines. What I do care about is somebody of one religion decrying the practices of another.
As to your answers:
1. Don't post infantile comments, and you won't receive gradeschool-class responses.
2. Then stop complaining about it.
3. Do you seriously believe that the celebration of Christmas is 100% Christian? If you're going to deny anybody the right to celebrate their holidays in public (so long as it does not involve human sacrifice or some other such atrocity), I have nothing more to say to you on the subject.
4. If you could type in proper English, then perhaps I would understand the point you are trying to get across.
5a. Oh, so now you're applying your OWN religion against Christianity in the barely legible "make workship to a human being" comment. You can throw out a whole world of criticism, but completely and utterly collapse when the favor is returned. If you don't care less about the USA, then why have you been slamming the Navy Cross? Before you deny claiming anything, don't get into the practice of making such extreme remarks.
5b1. Yes, I've heard the bit about people wanting to tell others to stop calling the USA "America," but that campaign has and always will fail miserably. Fact: it is more efficient to word "America" in speech and writing than it is to blurt out the whole "United States of America". Be happy that 'United States' is still used more often than 'America' in official forms. If you want to refer to another country in the North or South American continents, be more specific.
5b2. I'll call it
Pax Americana if I want. What are you going to do about it? Forward an irrelevant protest to the ADL?
Let me add one...
6. You typed "omg armin are you idiot or you just don't know to read english".
.
..
...
I really don't have much to say about that comment that isn't already painfully obvious to anybody with a lick of understanding of the English language.
Now let's see...how can I put this gently, in global terminology, and in a way that you might understand? Oh, I know! How about something infantile?
STFU.If you want to persist in talking about the evils of the world, including the Navy Cross (the greatest evil of all, you see), do so in
Debate and Serious Talk, even though many posts there do not necessarily fall under that description, and are generally supported (as so many online arguments are) by supposition, hearsay and personal grudges.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-01-18 12:28:31)