B.Schuss
I'm back, baby... ( sort of )
+664|7261|Cologne, Germany

of course having children is mainly an egoistic thing. But since that deccision also has positive ramnifications for the state ( you know, future tax payers and whatnot ) it makes sense to give benefits to those who contribute in such a way.

and of course people can chose to adopt. Which is why I said that I support financial benefits for everyone who choses to raise a child, wether it'll be in a traditional marriage, as a single parent, or through adoption.

And I do hope you have children one day. From what I have heard, it is truly a great experience. If you can afford it...
ZombieVampire!
The Gecko
+69|6247
You could achieve the same effect by allowing more refugees in.
B.Schuss
I'm back, baby... ( sort of )
+664|7261|Cologne, Germany

ZombieVampire! wrote:

You could achieve the same effect by allowing more refugees in.
I really don't want to sound unsensitive or racist here, but the problem with refugees or immigrants usually is that they often lack sufficient education to be able to really contribute to their host nation, at least in the first generation.

Of course, there is an IT engineer from India here and there, but from my experience, the majority of immigrants tend to be a burden on the social systems, rather than becoming taxpayers. I believe our american friends can tell you all about that.

I know, I am generalizing, but let's face it, those poor africans that try to cross the mediterranean sea into the EU, they don't have an education, they don't speak english, let alone german. They are simply not going to be able to contribute in a way that would justify the costs they cause in the social systems for a generation or more.

We need small children, which we can put through our education systems with reasonable chances of success, and which in turn will be fit for the challenges of the future.

providing tax incentives for those willing to help with that, either through regular child birth or adoption, is a no-brainer, I'd say.
ZombieVampire!
The Gecko
+69|6247

B.Schuss wrote:

I really don't want to sound unsensitive or racist here, but the problem with refugees or immigrants usually is that they often lack sufficient education to be able to really contribute to their host nation, at least in the first generation.
Except that:

1)  It's the fact that they're uneducated that often makes them willing to perform tasks that locals deem to be beneath them (i.e. unskilled labour)

2)  It's the next generation, which will likely be quite large, which can be useful.

B.Schuss wrote:

Of course, there is an IT engineer from India here and there, but from my experience, the majority of immigrants tend to be a burden on the social systems, rather than becoming taxpayers. I believe our american friends can tell you all about that.
And they'd probably skip over the part where much of the south's economy is based around them.

B.Schuss wrote:

providing tax incentives for those willing to help with that, either through regular child birth or adoption, is a no-brainer, I'd say.
Except that the more developed a society the less willing people are to have kids, which means ultimately you give so many tax breaks that it doesn't matter how many children they have you're still all screwed over.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6825|North Carolina

ZombieVampire! wrote:

You could achieve the same effect by allowing more refugees in.
There are 2 problems with this:

1) Disease

2) Crime

Disease is usually highly prevalent in areas with refugees.  Crime is an issue because most crises involve criminals who pose as refugees later who have pathological tendencies for crime.

In short, we've got enough poor, sick people as it is.  There's an endless flow coming from Mexico.  We need more rich and educated immigrants, not refugees.
ZombieVampire!
The Gecko
+69|6247

Turquoise wrote:

There are 2 problems with this:

1) Disease

2) Crime

Disease is usually highly prevalent in areas with refugees.  Crime is an issue because most crises involve criminals who pose as refugees later who have pathological tendencies for crime.

In short, we've got enough poor, sick people as it is.  There's an endless flow coming from Mexico.  We need more rich and educated immigrants, not refugees.
Both of which have more to do with economic/social factors than ethnicity.  That is:

If you support refugees properly and help them find jobs, they become a boon to your economy.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6825|North Carolina

ZombieVampire! wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

There are 2 problems with this:

1) Disease

2) Crime

Disease is usually highly prevalent in areas with refugees.  Crime is an issue because most crises involve criminals who pose as refugees later who have pathological tendencies for crime.

In short, we've got enough poor, sick people as it is.  There's an endless flow coming from Mexico.  We need more rich and educated immigrants, not refugees.
Both of which have more to do with economic/social factors than ethnicity.  That is:

If you support refugees properly and help them find jobs, they become a boon to your economy.
Agreed, but again...  we get all the poor we need from Mexico.  We don't need anymore than that.
ZombieVampire!
The Gecko
+69|6247
Uh...........ok................what does that have to do with the conversation at hand?
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6825|North Carolina

ZombieVampire! wrote:

Uh...........ok................what does that have to do with the conversation at hand?
Like any economic plan, there is a "sweet spot" in terms of economic returns.

Currently, we get all of our needed cheap labor from one source: Mexico.  We get so many people from them that we can't keep track of all of them.  Yet, we have tons of people coming in from other countries too doing mostly the same unskilled work.  There are a limited number of unskilled jobs, and when you figure in our own native-born unskilled people, there's very much an excess of unskilled labor here.

We need to invest more in education, but there are limits to how many technical programs we can set up.  We would be best off only letting in skilled and wealthy people from countries other than Mexico, because they provide more than enough unskilled labor alone.

So, as you said, with the right education investments and job placements, immigrants can be a boon, but there are limits to how many you can have entering your country at once and still receive an economic boom from it.
ZombieVampire!
The Gecko
+69|6247
But the discussion here is about whether there should be tax breaks for having children, and my point is just that you can instead use immigrant families.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard